on 03-04-2014 12:14 PM
i just wrote a email
1 line was
who does Brad need to talk to too solve the problem.
is that correct?
just curious
on 03-04-2014 08:55 PM
03-04-2014 10:16 PM - edited 03-04-2014 10:19 PM
To whom does Brad need to converse with, in order to resolve the problem.
on 03-04-2014 10:21 PM
@electric*mayhem*band wrote:To whom does Brad need to converse with, in order to resolve the problem.
to whom seems very shakespere like
on 03-04-2014 11:13 PM
on 03-04-2014 11:34 PM
don't forget the question mark!
on 04-04-2014 12:34 AM
on 04-04-2014 12:37 AM
ahem. I believe the term to be 'shakespearean' eh, what?
04-04-2014 03:37 AM - edited 04-04-2014 03:39 AM
Mrgrizz.
don't worry, I've had a little chat with Brad, and he promises he will never, ever, do that again.
ever.
he swears on it.
problem sorted 😉
on 04-04-2014 06:48 AM
@electric*mayhem*band wrote:To whom does Brad need to converse with, in order to resolve the problem.
Isn't the "with" redundant here? To converse automatically assumes it is with someone else.
Unless Brad is having this conversation in his head, in which case I quite understand the problem, and advise him to seek help in whatever form he choses.
on 04-04-2014 07:06 AM
@*mrgrizz* wrote:
@*sparklz* wrote:i just wrote
aan email
who does Brad need to talk
totoo solve the problemstill doesn't seem right
because it isn't
too you would use for meaning as well as/also
ie; I would like to come too.I wish to speak with suchabody too .
Quite a few people have trouble with knowing the difference between too and to .