---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Gosh, you've just dashed the argument of a couple here. 

 

What will they do now?   Apologise?    N B L

---

Apology accepted:)

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Gosh, you've just dashed the argument of a couple here. 

 

What will they do now?   Apologise?    N B L

---

Apology accepted:)

---

---

@idlewhile wrote:

---

@icyfroth wrote:

I have knowledge of it.

 

I just didn't read the book or go to see the film, and I don't intend to.

---

Sorry, my comment was not directed to you.  Silly reply button.

---

I didn't think it was lol.

I suppose unless he was holding a gun to her head on several occasions, it could be classed as norman consensual sex.

Norman was a dud.

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Norman was a dud.

---

so that WAS actually a gun in his pocket?

Apparently, I was not there.

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Apparently, I was not there.

---

understand...lol

I think the movie would take away the "imagination of the fantasy".  

Someone mentioned Brad Pitt, that is ok for her imagination.   

My imagination sees someone  "tall dark handsome" .

Not many movies transfer the imagination of  a book.

There have been a few "disgusting" books banned over time:

Lolita, Candide, Madame Bovary, Moll Flanders, The Well of Happiness, Ulysses, and a couple of Jackie Collins.

DEB

One of my friends described it as a modern day Cinderella story. If that's what women are into these days, I don't know much about romance then.