on โ21-02-2015 08:25 AM
on โ21-02-2015 05:32 PM
@polksaladallie wrote:Gosh, you've just dashed the argument of a couple here.
What will they do now? Apologise? N B L
Apology accepted:)
on โ21-02-2015 05:36 PM
@**bob_is_good** wrote:
@polksaladallie wrote:Gosh, you've just dashed the argument of a couple here.
What will they do now? Apologise? N B L
Apology accepted:)
on โ21-02-2015 06:18 PM
@idlewhile wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:I have knowledge of it.
I just didn't read the book or go to see the film, and I don't intend to.
Sorry, my comment was not directed to you. Silly reply button.
I didn't think it was lol.
on โ21-02-2015 06:23 PM
I suppose unless he was holding a gun to her head on several occasions, it could be classed as norman consensual sex.
on โ21-02-2015 06:25 PM
Norman was a dud.
on โ21-02-2015 06:35 PM
on โ21-02-2015 06:38 PM
Apparently, I was not there.
on โ21-02-2015 06:45 PM
@polksaladallie wrote:Apparently, I was not there.
understand...lol
on โ21-02-2015 07:46 PM
I think the movie would take away the "imagination of the fantasy".
Someone mentioned Brad Pitt, that is ok for her imagination.
My imagination sees someone "tall dark handsome" .
Not many movies transfer the imagination of a book.
There have been a few "disgusting" books banned over time:
Lolita, Candide, Madame Bovary, Moll Flanders, The Well of Happiness, Ulysses, and a couple of Jackie Collins.
DEB
on โ21-02-2015 08:30 PM
One of my friends described it as a modern day Cinderella story. If that's what women are into these days, I don't know much about romance then.