---

@rkxfamily wrote:

 

 Yes you may well be right about that DG.

I was excited when I saw TB's post as I thought I might be safe, but reading more into it maybe not.

 The wording is magnificently unclear lol.

 

 @@expanded_perceptions

 Yep I've kept it really light and polite but unfortunately I already asked them if perhaps there was an error or mis-delivery and pointed out the date,

Its amazing how something as simple as a return "gets" to you. (well me anyhow). I am honest with people and I expect the same back.

---

No of course, I would be the same! Easy for me to sit here saying be polite, I would be fuming, especially as like you, I pack my items ultra carefully, often double box, bubble wrap, label accordingly, photograph during packing, after packing, at the PO on the weighing scales etc... and I am honest like yourself. I possibly would have my adrenaline pumping like a Mike Tyson opponent in the 80's, so my advice is probably more theory than personal practice good luck though, and keep reaching out to these boards, as they really are supportive in these cases!!

you are 100% ghost    , because me and TB dont see eye to eye ,as some of the posters have said before ,he writes what he wants you to read and leaves out very important words  sometimes ,oh well lets hope rkx wins this one.

Sotty but you have lost as far as claiming through Aus Post is concerned if you posted in a prepaid satchel. Mobile phones must be sent by regular post with a road only sticker on them. If you ask AP for compensation you could well be in trouble when they see what was in the satchel.

You are within your rights to ask for a photo of the damage and if they won't provide one or a condition report from a qualified 3rd party then you can contest the claim.

---

@joethenuts wrote:

I think you will find that auspost will only deal with the seller ,as they paid for postage not the buyer,

the biggest problem is was it already damaged [which i dont think so]  before sending or by transit.

i would think auspost unless insured parcel  will do nothing,but you never know .good luck.

---

In order to substantiate a "damaged in transit"  against AP, the BUYER is the only one who can present the "damaged" goods with the packaging.  The seller is normally the only one the AP will discuss lost items, but this is not the case here.  BTW I have successfully solved a missing item (as a buyer) with AP without the seller's involvement. 

 OK, good to know, thanks PJ. 

 I have asked the buyer for photos, so it will be interesting to see what appears, or doesnt as the case may be.

@ CPJs

Yes I saw that CPJs. I was speculating above if it contrasts with the MBG policy. Seems its all in the reading or emphasis. Or emphaaaarsis lol. Anyway, this from TB1 is what first gave me some hope with the case:

Versus the MBG policy of:

"Not covered

• Items damaged during pick-up or postage or not delivered when the buyer arranges pick-up or delivery of the item (for instance, the buyer arranges freight)"

   

   

  I can easily read the MBG policy two ways. One listing a series of conditions that are not covered when "the buyer arranges freight", the other more like a list of scenarios whan the MBG does not apply including (presumably all) postage.

 But I am now thinking it must be the former.     

I don't know how this would work, but if there is a dispute over ownership of the phone (ie if eBay decide that the seller must refund the buyer) whether the seller then has the right to take back ownership of the item's IMEI, which would only pass to the buyer if the transaction was successful?

And what I am saying here is, if that buyer has designs on reselling an item which is described by them a damaged, then it would be worthless if it could not be used.

Sorry rkx I now realise looking through the whole thread you had noted that.  My mistake.

As you (and others) have also noted, the policy statement being discussed is not inconsistent with with the FAQ sheet - and references the MBG not applying to pick up items or those where the buyer organises freight themselves.

Agree with DG in that "Items damaged during pick-up or postage or not delivered when the buyer arranges pick-up or delivery of the item (for instance, the buyer arranges freight)"

I would email them and ask for the required proof and tell them if they provide it you will be blocking the IMEI numer until it arrives back so it will not work.

I will do that PJ.

 This has got me thinking; is there any requirement or onus on the buyers to prove the items are actually damaged in such a case with eBay's MBG policy? What proof is required other than their "word"?

 This is the request sent this morning BTW:

 So, what would happen if the buyer simply puts in their return request claim to eBay and "stonewalls" me. IE fails to respond in any way to me. If they just wait out the seven days without answering, will they automatically get their refund? Surely they must provide some reasonable proof?