on โ13-02-2014 11:38 PM
So I'm an experienced buyer and seller on eBay so I don't need to be told obvious things, but what I don't get at the moment is people who think it's A) justifiable to lie about postage methods and B) think it's morally OK to do so.
I purchased 6 small items of clothing from a seller and she "combined and discounted" postage to $25. When I clarified how the items were being posted (e.g. is it a 3kg satchel) she said some items were "bulky" and would require thorough packaging and a larger satchel. I was skeptical, as I've been ripped off more in the last year by newbies than any other year out of the 13 I've been on eBay. So I paid for it, trusting her, and of course, everything arrives in a 3kg satchel. I requested honesty from her and reimbursement of the extra, overcharged postage and she had the nerve to tell me her "stuffed went too cheap" - yes, that's how it was worded - and that her postage fee was "accurate".
I opened a dispute via Paypal knowing full well they don't cover the postage side of trading but hoping she'd still do the right thing. In the resolution centre, I asked her to address why she lied about the cost, fully intending to make a profit off me and circumvent eBay fees. Instead, she escalated the dispute to a claim and it was instantly closed. I'm still $11.60 out of pocket.
I left appropriate feedback and then I get this feedback tonight: Thanks for the entertainment, mcdonalds is on you tonight!
Reading between the lines, she's gloating that my extra money is paying for her dinner.
Is there NO protection for buyers at all against low-lifes like this? 'Cos eBay is becoming less and less enjoyable these days. And it is a totally unsatisfactory consolation that I got to leave 6 negative feedbacks.
TIA.
on โ14-02-2014 10:24 AM
@ausflylady wrote:The negatives all count even when left on same day, Mcdonalds might not taste so good when they realise the negs are there for 12 months
That's not quite true. Sure, the seller now has 6 negs to go with their 31 positives, but although they all appear in the seller's feedback stats, they still only count as one neg because they all apply to the same transaction, and even staggering the negs and leaving just one every 8 days would make no difference to their feedback percentage.
That is why she is still on 96.9% but had the negs been from different buyers, she would be on 83.8% instead (as explained below)...
โ14-02-2014 11:02 AM - edited โ14-02-2014 11:04 AM
@libertyandwhimsy wrote:
I left appropriate feedback and then I get this feedback tonight: Thanks for the entertainment, mcdonalds is on you tonight!
Reading between the lines, she's gloating that my extra money is paying for her dinner.
McDonalds is hardly something to gloat about, it's not fine dining and a meal only costs a couple of dollars, maybe her point was something else entirely.
on โ14-02-2014 11:18 AM
Or maybe she's a bogan and that's fine dining for her ?
Suggestions of other meanings are welcome!
on โ14-02-2014 11:19 AM
on โ14-02-2014 11:21 AM
on โ14-02-2014 11:23 AM
on โ14-02-2014 11:24 AM
on โ14-02-2014 11:26 AM
on โ14-02-2014 11:30 AM
@libertyandwhimsy wrote:Or maybe she's a bogan and that's fine dining for her ?
Suggestions of other meanings are welcome!
Actually, it reminded me of a neg I once saw, in which the buyer wrote that the seller was a scammer, theif and a liar. The seller's response was "Driving to the airport in my Ferrari with your $2 now".
I get that the cost / price etc of items doesn't matter - i.e. you have the right to expect certain things whether an item goes for 99c, like most of those items did, or $99.00, so that's not the issue. But at the same time, you purchased items, asked for a combined quote, individual P&H charges were combined and reduced from $59.25 to $25.00 - the seller didn't owe you more than that. They aren't obliged to charge exact costs of a satchel, despite the fact that you obviously expected it (that's the problem with expectations, they often lead to incorrect assumptions), and the fact that there is an $11.60 difference between the cost of the satchel and what they charged doesn't mean you've been "ripped off", IMHO.
on โ14-02-2014 11:30 AM