State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond

This thread is for the specific purpose of checking on milestone information (quotations and videos rather than table-form/spreadsheet/database information that fit better into k1ooo's thread), and responses by representatives from our government, CHOs, etc.

 

 

 

It's official: Australia has passed the 70% double dose vaccination rate.

 

 

Australia's double-dose vaccination rate has passed 70 per cent of all adults aged 16 and over

It is a key milestone in the national reopening plan.

More than 33 million vaccine doses have been distributed nationwide, and the first-dose rate nationally has reached 85.5 percent.

New South Wales and the ACT have already passed the 80 percent vaccination milestone, and Victoria and Tasmania are expected to reach 70 percent double-dosed within two days.❞

 

A tremendous achievement, but of course there is still some patchiness. We'll have to see some good efforts to correct misinformation, to provide solid health information, and to take the vaccine to the people who are not able or not willing to access it easily by themselves.

Message 1 of 163
Latest reply
162 REPLIES 162

Re: State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond

80.6%

of Australians aged 16 and

older are fully vaccinated

 

At our current pace of 657,167 second doses a week, we can expect 90% of

Australia’s adult population to be fully vaccinated by mid December 2021.

 

countessalmirena_0-1636387748823.png

 

 

 

Message 31 of 163
Latest reply

Re: State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond

Australians should embrace reopening – with confidence

An opinion piece from Professor Paul Kelly, the Australian Government's Chief Medical Officer, on embracing reopening with confidence.

 

I have been struck by the noticeable change in mood of people around me as COVID-19 restrictions have started to be relaxed. Mostly, people have been excited and optimistic, itching to get out and about again. But not always.

 

My message to Australians is to be confident and enjoy the hard-won freedoms as individual jurisdictions make decisions to lift most restrictions for all and even more for those who are fully protected by vaccination.

 

Yes, COVID-19 is in the Australian community, and it will remain here for the foreseeable future.

 

But 80 per cent of Australians aged 16 and over are now fully vaccinated, and our state and territory healthcare systems and our primary care systems are well prepared and have the capacity to cope with any increased demands that may occur from time to time as our country continues to reopen.

 

If you are feeling uneasy, support is available. Talk to your GP or specialist. Reach out for mental health support if you need it. Talk to your friends and family. Stay connected.

 

We have to accept we will continue to see cases of COVID-19 in Australia, and that some people with increased vulnerability may suffer significant illness or even death. That happens every year with other infectious diseases like influenza.

 

However, we know that with our high vaccination rates, the number of people who will become seriously ill and potentially die from the virus will be relatively small.

 

None of this is to diminish the fact that every death to COVID-19 is a tragedy – and my heart goes out to everyone affected by such circumstances.

 

The Australian Government is about to start rolling out booster doses to people who have completed their two-dose primary vaccination course at least six months ago.

 

In the context of boosters, it is important people know that two doses of COVID-19 vaccine provide very good protection, especially against severe disease. A booster dose, six or more months after the second dose will make sure that the protection from the first doses is even stronger and longer lasting and should help prevent spread of the virus.

 

Just like we live with the flu, we have to live with COVID-19. And just like living with the flu, as we live with COVID-19 we need to maintain all of the healthy practices that have become such an important part of our response to the pandemic.

 

Remember to maintain good hand washing and cough and sneeze hygiene. Get tested if you have any symptoms, and stay at home until you know you don’t have COVID-19, or as required by your local authorities. And wear a mask if it makes you feel safe, even if it’s not compulsory.

 

Preventing serious illness is always better than treating it – and it’s for this reason, vaccination is so important. But, subject to the approval of the Therapeutic Goods Administration, treatments in the form of pills that can be taken at home will start to become available in early 2022 for COVID-19 infections. However, these are not a substitute for vaccination.

 

These treatments, that are already available in hospitals, will help to reduce the potentially serious effects of COVID-19 for those who have contracted it.

 

Australians have overwhelmingly embraced the need to get vaccinated against COVIID-19 – and to reach the 80 per cent double-dose mark across the country is an extraordinary achievement. It again reflects the fact Australia is a country that understands the significant protections provided by vaccines.

 

I encourage every eligible person who hasn’t yet done so to make an appointment to get vaccinated. If you haven’t been inclined to get vaccinated, I would encourage you to keep reviewing that decision, noting the high protection levels the vaccines being administered in Australia provide.

 

When every state and territory across the country has hit 80 per cent, we can expect, at worst, lockdowns to be imposed only in highly targeted ways.

 

As a Canberran, I have experienced the challenges of living in lockdowns these past few months. But like NSW and Victoria, restrictions in the ACT have recently been eased and I have again been able to enjoy some of my favourite pastimes that were off limits in the lockdown world.

 

I have been for a swim. And I have taken in a movie. I have also been up to Sydney to see my dad, and I hope to attend my niece’s long-awaited wedding in Western Australia when border restrictions allow.

 

Millions of Australians are similarly reconnecting with their favourite activities as a result of eased restrictions that have been made possible by our high vaccination rates. They should enjoy them with the confidence that comes from a highly vaccinated population, and well prepared state and territory healthcare systems supported by the Australian Government.

 

  • Beyond Blue (1300 224 636), Lifeline (13 11 14), Kids Helpline (1800 551 800), Butterfly Foundation (1800 334 673)
  • Head to Health: headtohealth.gov.au

 

 

 

Just as a quick note: Prof. Paul Kelly doesn't have the first-hand Melbourne experience of lockdown, which means that he hasn't the same experience of the after-effects of those repeated and protracted lockdowns upon our psyches. To balance what Prof. Kelly has said above, it's worth looking at what Victoria's CHO Brett Sutton said on 29th October, when Melbourne's restrictions were being wound back:

 

He said there would be mixed feeling within the community as restrictions eased and the risk of transmission rose.

He said it was likely some people would feel anxiety about restrictions easing.

“We will all at some point risk encountering Covid and maybe getting it, but it is a good thing that we will largely, as a vaccinated population, get mild illness,” he said.

“If people are coming to the open world with some anxiety, they should just move at a pace that suits them.

“Don’t feel obliged to take every invitation that you get to busy places until you’re comfortable in seeing how that’s playing out for you.”

 

I note what Prof. Kelly says re "some people with increased vulnerability may suffer significant illness or even death". That's well worth being discussed, and I'll open a thread for that purpose.

 

 

Message 32 of 163
Latest reply

Re: State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond


@countessalmirena wrote:

The purpose of this thread could not be clearer. I posted it in the very opening post:

 


❝This thread is for the specific purpose of checking on milestone information (quotations and videos rather than table-form/spreadsheet/database information that fit better into k1ooo's thread), and responses by representatives from our government, CHOs, etc.❞


 

Please cease being disrespectful and disruptive; that is against par. 4 and par. 8 of the Community Guidelines in the Community Rules of Engagement. I ask this with all courtesy, and remind you that there are several other threads on which you are able to post the content that you have posted here against the stated purpose of this thread.

 


                                                              ------------------------------------------------

 

I am  not being disrespectful. There are other posts by other members here that are not in keeping with what you have said. I have no intention of being disruptive.

 

The below post by you here is something that is being disputed and professionals in medicine would disagree,

https://community.ebay.com.au/t5/Community-Spirit/State-by-State-Australia-vs-Elsewhere-in-the-age-o...

 

Perhaps it may be better if a thread questioning certain aspects of the content here is started.  I'm definitely not looking to discredit what you say, or this thread, but it may be better.

 

Again. I am not being disrespectful or intentionally disruptive.

 

Peace

 

Message 33 of 163
Latest reply

Re: State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond


@4channel wrote:

This Dr. M., well ...  he's on the money. Great clip! I hope that he hasn't got a few unpaid parking fines as this will be dredged up.


Funny coming from you - hilarious in fact. 🤣

Message 34 of 163
Latest reply

Re: State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond

For those who are carefully evaluating , there are plenty of test subjects now 

Message 35 of 163
Latest reply

Re: State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond

I imagine most people on these boards would have heard of the nurse (Christina Hartmann Benz) who faked giving vaccinations to family members and friends (and apparently a broader cohort than this as well; the word appears to have gone out).

 

She must have worried that she might be under suspicion when one of the doctors who is the owner of the clinic where she'd asked (and been accepted) to administer the vaccinations informed her that he'd be present while she gave the vaccinations that day. Suspicion had been raised by the number of people coming to that practice, asking specifically for her (by name), and refusing to be vaccinated by anyone else. I think it was 25 people.

 

The doctor observed, and even though the nurse tried to deceive him with a melodramatic fake injection-giving scene, his suspicions were confirmed. She discarded the needle with the vaccine still in it, and she actually wrote another practitioner's name down as having administered that dose. It was not the only instance of her having falsely entered another person's name in place of her own.

 

Apparently she and her husband (a chiropracter) are fervent anti-vaxxers. She's appeared in the Perth Magistrates Court and has been charged; further charges will probably be laid. She's out on bail and part of the conditions of bail include her not contacting the people she's "injected" as police want to avoid collusion. I very much doubt she's got any respect for that condition, for she certainly hasn't respect for legitimate medical practitioners' livelihoods, or for the conditions of employment or for public health orders or for the law or for the safety of CHILDREN that she's fake-injected...

Message 36 of 163
Latest reply

Re: State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond

I had vaguely heard of the case but not all the details.

If someone chooses not to be vaccinated, that is their decision but they should be willing to be honest about it.

Charges should be laid. Nothing to do with the vaccination as such, but falsifying medical documents of any kind for gain should not be on.

 

Had this nurse not considered that all the people she falsely vaccinated would go down in the stats as people who showed no adverse reactions, so it would be falsely boosting the safety rating. The nurse might have thought that the stats 25 or 50 people wouldn't matter or make much difference but if you have that sort of thing happening elsewhere across the country too, then they are sabotaging any proper stats.

Plus-what if those people come down with covid and become extremely sick.

It would make the vaccine look less effective than it actually was.

 

Throw the book at her.

Message 37 of 163
Latest reply

Re: State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond


@springyzone wrote:

I had vaguely heard of the case but not all the details.

If someone chooses not to be vaccinated, that is their decision but they should be willing to be honest about it.

Charges should be laid. Nothing to do with the vaccination as such, but falsifying medical documents of any kind for gain should not be on.

 


                                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Breaking the law is wrong and there should be consequences. But there are things to take into account springyzone. Mandating vaccines is wrong, immoral and can't be justified. The "vaccinated" may one day become the super-spreaders. But let's get to the point here. People's lives are being destroyed. Basically it's now ....  "Listen, take the jab or we will do this to you". Well, what are people expected to do. The most precious fundamental right to choose what goes into one's body is being desecrated and defiled.

                                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------


@springyzone wrote:

 

Had this nurse not considered that all the people she falsely vaccinated would go down in the stats as people who showed no adverse reactions, so it would be falsely boosting the safety rating. The nurse might have thought that the stats 25 or 50 people wouldn't matter or make much difference but if you have that sort of thing happening elsewhere across the country too, then they are sabotaging any proper stats.

Plus-what if those people come down with covid and become extremely sick.

It would make the vaccine look less effective than it actually was.

 

Throw the book at her.


                                     

 

                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Now we know that "vaccinated" people can spread the virus, the rhetoric is changing and "unvaccinated" people are being blamed for being blamed for being potential financial drain on our medical system if they end up being hospitalized. Well that can all be changed with honesty.

 

Sorry, I strongly disagree with you when you say "Throw the book at her.".  It's quite likely in her misguided actions,  she thought she was doing things for humanitarian reasons, not unlike the good Germans that hid Jews and others during Hitler's horrible reign. In saying that, I do believe she should be fined and not allowed to work as a nurse again. Or perhaps she could repent by working in Africa where famine is and help people there.

 

Further thoughts on this can be seen below

https://community.ebay.com.au/t5/Community-Spirit/Seriously-and-calmly-can/m-p/2441129#M751996

 

 

 

Message 38 of 163
Latest reply

Re: State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond

Oh for heavens sake - stick to at least one topic.

 

The dishonest falsifying of legal documents - for whatever misguided reason - is criminal.

 

THROW THE BOOK AT HER.

Message 39 of 163
Latest reply

Re: State by State, Australia vs Elsewhere, in the age of COVID-19 and beyond

There was a large but mainly peaceful protest today in Melbourne concerning the “pandemic” bill which has already passed in the lower house.

 

I’m not the protest-attending type (especially as I have immunocompromised family member to protect), but I’m sympathetic on this issue. The proposed law overreaches (in my view). Yet once again a legitimate concern has been hijacked to some extent by anti-vaxxers who just couldn’t let a protest proceed without sticking their oar in.

 

I suppose that if I organised an anti-kale protest march, hey presto, there’d be anti-vaccination chants popping up as well. “NO KALE! NO SPROUTS! ALL JABS… ARE OUT!”

 

The presence of Craig Kelly lent no legitimacy or sense to the protest… yet another reason not to be there.

 

 

 

Excuse me while I go to my turret to write virulent and powerful anti-kale propaganda, and a vividly imagined trilogy called The Foul Sprouts of Brusseldom. (My BS-hating heroes will triumph in the end, after the depths of tribulation and an assortment of kale-smoothie-loving figures of villainy emerge from the Kale Pit to enslave all mankind.)

 

Message 40 of 163
Latest reply