on 24-04-2015 06:57 AM
on 27-04-2015 08:26 PM
Here is what I think on that count...
If your sales volume is cruising along at the rate that keeps you on a 3-monthly reporting cycle then your sales sag so you drop back onto a 12-monthly reporting cycle then suddenly you will see defects showing up from 12-moths ago.
Conversely if your sales pick up again then suddenly those older defects should disappear off the radar.
In our case tho we are maintaining the 3-monthly cycle.
on 27-04-2015 08:39 PM
27-04-2015 08:41 PM - edited 27-04-2015 08:42 PM
@clarry100 wrote:Here is what I think on that count...
If your sales volume is cruising along at the rate that keeps you on a 3-monthly reporting cycle then your sales sag so you drop back onto a 12-monthly reporting cycle then suddenly you will see defects showing up from 12-moths ago.
Conversely if your sales pick up again then suddenly those older defects should disappear off the radar.
In our case tho we are maintaining the 3-monthly cycle.
What you are saying makes sense, however, if you are maintaining a 3 monthly cycle (which I no longer am ) then it doesn't really explain your current situation
Edit : Sorry, were you referring to twyngwyn's situation ? Sorry, my misunderstanding I think
on 28-04-2015 07:25 AM
Yes MB I was replying to twyngyn.
You are correct tho that in our case since we are maintaining a 3-monthly cycle what has happened to us makes no sense.
The only changes have been that our POS FB score has gone up (albeit small) in that same 24-hour period.
So on that basis alone the percentage should have dropped even if only by a small amount. Instead we are seeing a twofold increase.