Refund of UK VAT charged on item purchased from UK seller with Australian delivery address

[domino-710]

---

@creekman51 wrote:

what a load of garbage they did it for one simple reason and one simple reason only ...too make more MONEY!!

---

Now that is what I actually call ' garbage '. 

[padi*0409]

---

@creekman51 wrote:

what a load of garbage they did it for one simple reason and one simple reason only ...too lose less MONEY!!

---

There ya go champ - fixed it for ya..............

[imastawka]

---

@padi*0409 wrote:

---

@creekman51 wrote:

what a load of garbage they did it for one simple reason and one simple reason only ...too lose less MONEY!!

---

There ya go champ - fixed it for ya..............

what a load of garbage they did it for one simple reason and one simple reason only ...to lose less MONEY!!

But I fixed it even betterer so it's much less worse  😆

---

[domino-710]

LOL - ' too funny '.

[gutterpunkz05]

---

@creekman51 wrote:

what a load of garbage they did it for one simple reason and one simple reason only ...too make more MONEY!!

Now who's spruking  garbage...     Why was it approved by the  ACCC if it was to make ebay money.

Go trawling through ACCC files and then come back.

---

[davewil1964]

In this context 'too' is incorrect. So you fixed it to make it more worserer.

'Too' is a synonym for 'and', 'to' is not. Refer my above reply for proper context.

[creekman51]

so what your saying is?.... it doesn't make ebay money?  nice one brains!

[creekman51]

YAWN!! so ebay was losing money on postage before this little scam came about? BWAHAHAHAHA!

[countessalmirena]

Stop this childish behaviour. Insulting other members and posting repetitive little digs just because you have a beef with eBay is not worthy of who you can be.

Why not try engaging with the members here on a new basis of civility? You might end up making good friends and getting helpful replies.

[creekman51]

but you'd call "a duck a chook" so what's that matter?!