Blocking australians

I just heard on the news that ebay wants to block Australians.

I am in shock.

I am one Australian that is saddened about this news.

Although i don't always get my orders, most of the time I do. 

One time my order was sent back to the seller and they never told me. 

So they kept my order and money. 

I love ebay it will definitely have an impact on my life if I am not allowed to use ebay anymore. 

Please vote here to keep ebay for us Australians. 

Regards Elly from Sydney. 

Spoiler
Proudly Australian 

 

Message 1 of 26
Latest reply
25 REPLIES 25

Re: Blocking australians

No GST is not payable on second hand items UNLESS you are a business registered for GST. A private individual selling/buying second-hand items does NOT charge/pay GST (e.g. an eBay seller who is not a business and who is selling clothing they no longer need cannot charge GST and neither can the buyer be charged it). So if I buy second-hand clothing from a private individual in the USA who is clearing out their closet I am not liable to pay GST at all. This was told to me by an accountant.

Message 11 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Blocking australians


@caryns wrote:

No GST is not payable on second hand items UNLESS you are a business registered for GST. A private individual selling/buying second-hand items does NOT charge/pay GST (e.g. an eBay seller who is not a business and who is selling clothing they no longer need cannot charge GST and neither can the buyer be charged it). So if I buy second-hand clothing from a private individual in the USA who is clearing out their closet I am not liable to pay GST at all. This was told to me by an accountant.


 

Any business in Australia that sells more than $75,000 per 12 month period ( rolling basis )  is required to charge EVERYONE including private buyers, GST on their goods or services, regardless of wether they are new or used. Example - if you buy used clothes from a private op shop or high end used fashion emporium, the business is required to charge you, the private buyer GST, If the shop sells more than $75,000 per 12 months. This includes Australian based, ebay clothes sellers who sell more than $75,000 in any 12 month period.

 

If a BUSINESS buys used items from a private seller or small ( ebay ) business that sells less than $75,000 per year, they will not pay GST, unless the small business SELLER chooses to be registered for GST purposes. Some very small businesses choose to be registered and charge GST, particularly if they regularly supply larger businesses who expect to deal with some-one who charges them GST. ( think ebay stationary suppliers, small plant propagating nurseries supplying trees to farmers etc. ) It can complicate larger businesses accounting processes if they purchase from non GST. registered suppliers.

 

You are correct that private sellers are not required to charge GST on items that have been used personally and then sold, once no longer needed. BUT it would be extremly rare for a private seller to sell more than $75,000 worth of their own clothes on ebay in a twelve month period.

 

To summarise, ............All private buyers will pay GST on purchases of used items from any Australian business that sells over $75,000 per annum and also some smaller business sellers who chose to register for GST.

 

Private sellers, selling there own personal stuff are not required to charge GST even on the rare occasions it totals more than $75,000 per year. ( think collections, not originally purchased with the intention to increase in value or deceased estates etc. )

Message 12 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Blocking australians

 The E is not eBay.................................the other one.

 

This is an email received.

 

The Australian government has introduced new legislation that will, if not altered, require online marketplaces to collect GST on any sales into Australia, even if the seller sells less than the $75,000 threshold that would require them to collect GST.

 

The new law would not only increase costs for any goods you buy from overseas, but it also sets a dangerous precedent for Australian makers who export their goods through platforms like E...

 

We're concerned about the consequences of passing such a law. Australia would be the first country to require foreign sellers and marketplaces to collect and remit GST on any item, no matter how small.

 

Other countries will likely follow suit, meaning you could be required to collect and remit VAT, GST, or sales tax on any goods you export to other countries.

 

If every country were to pass these kinds of laws, we believe microbusiness exports around the world would plummet, especially through global marketplaces like E...

 

That's why we're testifying before the Senate this week, and asking you to sign this petition opposing the new law.

 

Please sign our petition and tell the government you don't want a new tax on online overseas purchases.

 

You can learn more about the campaign, created by Disrupt Sports CEO Gary Elphick, here.

Thank you for your help!

Message 13 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Blocking australians

Ebay for Australians, Yep, no probs, it still will be.

 

I see no problems with either EBAY stopping purchases to overseas sellers,

I buy frequently from overseas but happy to pay more locally, I also buy locally.

and yes its a step in the right direction, to test, for other countries to also follow.

Anything there is a demand for will get provided by local sellers in a small

amount of time. Items will not stay unavailable for long.

We have a huge amount of people eager to take up any slack, eager to

import and sell.

 

Its a move against tax dodging, then it moves into the bigger corporations if not already

skipping straight to them. Like ebay amazon google apple microsoft etc etc

 

Many many countries are now losing their tax money to off shore sellers.

If in doubt the off shore sellers could register their business in ireland or

whereever and claim their profits are earned there and dodge even more taxs.

Hey lets all do that, governments would then have no money for services.

 

Reigning that back in would be a good thing.

 

Otherwise, consumption tax you may as well ditch it and go back to good old higher income tax.

Probably will have to do that anyway as way too much opposition to trying

to tax income revenue profits etc that streams to overseas often where

they too dont pay tax much. So just go back to taxing the money before it gets spent,

lol, we have that still dont we.

 

Now it gets really dodgy when the likes of Norman Smithy Amazing etc etc n such have large

online presense and sell over ebay or just online from china or elsewhere thru ireland based companies

or such, no gst, no dutues, no taxs, lots of profits.

 

It has to be stopped.

They can cough up or shutup or shut shop.

Either way is good for everyone eventually.

 

Ebay will not close down, and will not halt overseas sales. Thats just a threat. Easy to implement.

Too much money to be made in it.

 

 

 

 

 

Message 14 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Blocking australians

You guys seem to have miised the point, GST is applicable but the new regulations are to close the $1,000.oo GST import exemption loophole.

It seems to me that the idea is to make it a more even playing field. I think that at the moment Aussie sellers have to pay 10% GST on all their income so they have to add that on to their price, whereas overseas sellers selling into Australia, items that cost less than $1,000.oo, don't have that 10% extra cost. Why should Australian sellers lose out to overseas competitors just because there is a Tax Loophole because the Government can't work out how to collect GST on small value imports. 

From what I understand with the English system of VAT is that the Post Office charges VAT on all overseas parcels valued over 12pounds, it must be paid when picking up the parcel as well as an administration fee. Considering how slack Australia Post is with just carding parcels and forcing people to pick them up from the Post Office anyway, this won't make much of a difference. Private freight companies can do the same as they do with deliveries over $1000.oo they get you to pay via credit card over the phone before releasing the parcel for delivery.

If they do close this loophole and add a service charge, it will mean that all Australians will benefit, at the moment we subsidies overseas mail deliveries within Australia. It cost me more to post a small parcel to the next suburb than it costs someone from England or China to send a parcel toanywhere in Australia even Kalgoolie or Mt Isa.  This is probably why Australia Post has been in trouble for so many years.

Message 15 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Blocking australians


@model.trains wrote:

You guys seem to have miised the point, GST is applicable but the new regulations are to close the $1,000.oo GST import exemption loophole.

No-one here has missed the point but it seems that you are.  What the Government wants to do is charge GST on all imports, not just those above the $1000 cut off point.

 

It seems to me that the idea is to make it a more even playing field. I think that at the moment Aussie sellers have to pay 10% GST on all their income so they have to add that on to their price, whereas overseas sellers selling into Australia, items that cost less than $1,000.oo, don't have that 10% extra cost. Why should Australian sellers lose out to overseas competitors just because there is a Tax Loophole because the Government can't work out how to collect GST on small value imports. 

Not all sellers have to charge or remit GST.  They do not have to register for GST until their turnover is $75000 in a rolling 12 months.

 

From what I understand with the English system of VAT is that the Post Office charges VAT on all overseas parcels valued over 12pounds, it must be paid when picking up the parcel as well as an administration fee. Considering how slack Australia Post is with just carding parcels and forcing people to pick them up from the Post Office anyway, this won't make much of a difference. Private freight companies can do the same as they do with deliveries over $1000.oo they get you to pay via credit card over the phone before releasing the parcel for delivery.

It is all well and good to say that the GST on all parcels should be collected in the same way as it is now on the higher value parcels but that would not work.   The present system charges way more than 10% for imports over $1000.  There are Customs clearance charges, GST, import duties.....on an average the charges work out at something like 25-40% of the value of the item depending on the rate at which duties are charged on individual items.

 

 

If they do close this loophole and add a service charge, it will mean that all Australians will benefit, at the moment we subsidies overseas mail deliveries within Australia. It cost me more to post a small parcel to the next suburb than it costs someone from England or China to send a parcel toanywhere in Australia even Kalgoolie or Mt Isa.  This is probably why Australia Post has been in trouble for so many years.

Of course we subsidise the postage on items from overseas once they arrive in Australia.  And other countries subsidise Australian postage once out items arrive in their countries.  It has been that way for over 100 years and is not likely to change any time soon.

Australia Post is not in trouble....the letter post section is runnng at a loss (maybe) but that is more than made up for by the parcel post section of AP.  AP just likes to cry poor to justify the ever increasing postage rates.


 

Message 16 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Blocking australians

What you said. Especially the bit about the bumper not understanding the point. Or finance/economics

Message 17 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Blocking australians

I think that IF and thats a huge If GST is payable on sedcond hand goods it would only be applied by a seller registered for GST

Al seller who isnt registered for GST cant collect or apply GST.

 

A person selling a second hand item can not and would not be able to apply GST.

Message 18 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Blocking australians

That is what I said.....any seller with a turnover of $75000 or more in a rolling 12 month period is required to register for GST.....it does not matter whether it is new or used.

Think second hand shops.....they sell used items but still have to register for GST.  Think car wrecking yards....their goods are second hand but they still have to be registered for GST.   There is no IF about it.

Message 19 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Blocking australians


@flyoz wrote:

I think that IF and thats a huge If GST is payable on sedcond hand goods it would only be applied by a seller registered for GST

Al seller who isnt registered for GST cant collect or apply GST.

 

A person selling a second hand item can not and would not be able to apply GST.


They might not apply GST, but if turnover is more than $75k, they are REQUIRED BY LAW to register for and remit GST to the ATO.

 

I think one of my previous comments on this OLD thread mentioned understanding commerce/economics as a plus for being in business. I will add Tax law to that.

 

And if you don't understand it, it is probably not prudent to advise people about it.

Message 20 of 26
Latest reply