Read everything if you don't want to be accused of being wrong. Stating you post within 3 days after you receive payment IS misleading when you deliberately make a buyer wait longer by posting after their payment is cleared into your bank account.
In reply to the kitten; Flying Nun.....
|
I did read everything. I think perhaps you should take your own advice - I'd certainly appreciate it if you read everything I wrote before responding, anyways, otherwise we'll just end up going around in circles for as long as the both of us continue to attempt making a point, which I'll most likely desist after this post.
I choose my words carefully, and I (usually) make sure there's ones like if in my post when there are pertinent facts that are both unknown to me and have the possibility of altering my opinion on the matter at hand.
I also used the word deliberately in my previous post - this is because I would never presume to know the intentions of a member whose actions are being discussed without the benefit of their insight. I have no idea, when the seller chose their handling time, what the reasoning behind the three days was, and neither do you, but if that's the time it takes for a payment to clear, it is not misleading at all. How can it possibly be?
Payment clears to PayPal, bank transfer initiated, takes three days, seller posts. Seems pretty straightforward and upfront to me.
The only factor in this particular case that may still be a bone of contention, as far as I'm concerned, is the initial 4 days before the bank transfer. Since neither of us know what the reason for that was, we can make no judgements as to its legitimacy.
I have no qualms about so-called "accusations" of being wrong. Rather a strange thing, to put it like that, but that's really neither here nor there. What is important is that in discussions that aren't a matter of opinion, I rather like to know if and when I'm wrong.
Sincerely
Sally ๐
