on โ14-08-2012 04:09 PM
to all coin sellers re combined postage, i have been buy coins for a while now and the biggest problem in this section is the blatant postal profiteering and refusal to combine post i have received 1 death threat and 3 threats of home invasion from members about this i dont mind paying reasonable post rate and small fee for each additional item some sellers are demanding ridiculase rates[up to 15.00] and wont combine post than send item in standard envlope plus 60c postage a good example say post is 2.00 for post and handling and i buy 10 coins total 20.00 and some sellers actually expect you to pay that if you say that you wont pay this they put you into dispute to cover their on disgusting behahavuor so to all you postal profiteers up yours to all buyers if you come across this and still want coins demand that they send coins packaged and post separetly that buggers them up a bit as they cant refuse as it is your right
on โ12-11-2015 02:17 PM
Left me preface this by stating I know this has nothing to do with postage but the thread seems to have gone off topic some time ago.
This is precisely the reason why many buyers, including myself, rarely leave negative feedback:
(1) Negative FB often seems to be interpreted as deriving from an overly demanding buyer or competitor;
(2) Even though suggested in jest here, some people seem to think it OK to retaliate.
I have checked the OP's Feedback Left for Others. In the past twelve months they have left Negative/Neutral for 5 sellers although many of the sales were for multiple items. In my experience this does not seem excessive although personally I would not leave Negative/Neutral for postage issues.
In the past year some of the experiences I have had include:
I left Negative/Neutral feedback for none of these transaction because if I had done so anyone like the posters here trawling through my feedback would deem me to be the one at fault.
I left Negative feedback for two sellers this year. One seller who promised me on at least six occcasions they would send the item but after six weeks it was still not sent. One seller who emailed me stating they were selling the item to the next bidder because I had not paid. When I explained I had paid by their preferred method (bank deposit) immediately after they sent me the banking details, they sent a sarcastic response along the lines of, "Surprise, surprise, no payment in my account" then emailed later stating they were sending the following day ... presumably, surprise, surprise, the payment was in the account.
Yes, I do sell the same items as most of the things I buy so, technically, I guess I am a "competitor". This is hardly surprising or uncommon. Many collectors will buy a bulk lot for one item then eventually resell the others.
You have absolutely no evidence the OP has left malicious feedback to try to damage the reputation of competitors. You are making your assumptions based on nothing more than the feedback left by the OP. You know nothing about the items. You know nothing about the transactions. You know nothing about the integrity of the OP or the sellers involved.
Trashing someone for leaving Negative/Neutral feedback and suggesting revenge, even in jest, only skews the whole feedback system even more because soon no one will leave honest feedback.
on โ12-11-2015 03:02 PM
Whilst I agree with you that too much trashing of members based on, lets say doubtful, assumptions does occur on occasions in these forums, in this particular case I believe you are in error. The evidence is ther for all to see on the Toolhaus site, the OP has left over 120 negs, all for sellers who (coincidentally?) sell much the same items as the OP. The vast majority of these feeback comments appear to have been removed by eBay, presumably following removal requests by the recipient sellers. eBay is NOT in the habit of removing feedback without substantial evidence that it was left maliciously.
โ12-11-2015 04:06 PM - edited โ12-11-2015 04:09 PM
Correct penny, as usual.
And to add as the OP appears to have received their answer to their post, with new information being bought to light, we other posters took the opportunity to jest with the intent to affirm that the goods guys can always win.
I appreciate not jumping to conclusions however in this case it appears a member has misused and abused a priviledge for whatever reason.
This particular member will not be purchasing any numismatic items I may list.
Such is how the current preventative train is working until ebay is able to investigate more deeply into more members and sanction accordingly.