on 12-02-2014 11:22 PM
on 12-02-2014 11:23 PM
on 13-02-2014 01:41 PM
Sorry I really can't make anything out of the first photo. I think the second one should be the key - 3 conjoined circles - I would say clover leaf except there's no tail. Now typically there should be a letter in each "circle" - you will be able to tell much better than we can. Is that a T at the top? See what you can make out.
on 13-02-2014 02:53 PM
yes its a clover that one we can see its top circle is (T) LOWER LEFT (&) LOWER RIGHT (C) OUTHER MARK IS LION STANDING
NEXT IS A LION FACE OR MONKEY AND THEN A S
on 13-02-2014 02:55 PM
IFi can date this ring i can link it ti the wife of the first priminister (barton) this is the key part and i just cant see it
on 13-02-2014 06:26 PM
A couple of things. Is the ring of sufficient quality - the marks seem quite rough. Do you mean ring as in jewellery? Unless it was something unusual (like a presentation piece, commission) english hallmarked silver rings in the late Victorian / Edwardian era are not that common - gold was really not very expensive. The Barton family would not have been poor. Is it something in a special shape, like a buckle ring?
on 13-02-2014 06:54 PM
the bartons were very poor spent most of the 1890s as bankrupts do yoy have a email so i can talk to you abou it and a bag full of items you seem to know about antiques by what you sell i think you now your stuff
on 13-02-2014 07:54 PM
I can be contacted through any of my for sale items - use ask seller a question.
on 13-02-2014 09:15 PM
The closest I can do is Charles Boyton and Sons, London, 1914.
on 14-02-2014 01:23 AM
Try this link I have found it helpful in the past.
http://www.silverresearch.org/
or this one
http://www.langantiques.com/university/index.php/Category:Jewelry_Maker%27s_Marks