on 13-05-2013 09:29 AM
AND so the great global warming scare dies. Around Australia, bruised taxpayers will ask each other: "What the hell was that about?"
The 10 signs of the death of the scare are unmistakable. Now it's time to hold the guilty to account.
Just why did we spend the past year paying the world's biggest carbon tax, which drove our power bills through the roof?
Why were our children forced to sit through multiple screenings of Al Gore's dodgy scare-flick An Inconvenient Truth?
Why did we scar the most beautiful parts of our coast with ludicrously expensive windfarms?
And why did so many people swallow such bull, from the British Climatic Research Unit's prediction that "children just aren't going to know what snow is" to ABC science presenter Robyn Williams' claim that 100m rises in sea levels this century were "possible, yes".
Yes, we may yet see some warming resume one day.
But we will be wiser. We have learned not to fall so fast for the end-of-the-world sermons of salvation-seekers and the tin-rattling of green carpetbaggers.
And here is why.
1st sign: The world isn't warming
Yes, the planet warmed about 0.7 degrees last century, but then halted.
Professor Richard Lindzen, arguably the world's most famous climate scientist, has argued for two years that "there has been no warming since 1997". Others date the pause as late as 2000.
Even the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change admitted in its latest draft report that while its usual measurements of global temperature found some warming trends since 1998, "none of these are statistically significant".
2nd sign: The warming models are wrong
The weekend papers screamed alarm: "The level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has surpassed 400 parts per million for the first time in human history."
But wait. Lots more carbon dioxide, but no more warming? This isn't what we were told to expect.
See, predictions the world is heating dangerously are based on mathematical models of how the climate is meant to work. Add our emissions to the equation, and scientists are meant to figure how much the world should warm.
But as Professor Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, told a US Congressional committee last month, those models guessed too high, and didn't predict pauses in warming longer than 17 years.
Ed Hawkins, of the University of Reading, found the global temperature since 2005 on the very lowest end of the widest range predicted by influential climate models.
3rd sign: Warming disasters aren't happening
In 2007, Chief Climate Commissioner Tim Flannery predicted "even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and our river systems". But it did.
In 2001, the IPCC predicted "milder winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms". But the US National Snow and Ice Data Center this year tried to claim global warming had now increased snowstorms in the US.
In 2008, Greens leader Bob Brown claimed data showed "drought is the new norm across Australia's greatest foodbowl", the Murray-Darling basin. But the drought quickly broke.
Same story with so many other scares. Al Gore was wrong - the critical glaciers of the Himalayas are not vanishing, with Bristol University researchers now finding "negligible mass loss". Nor are we getting more cyclones, bigger floods, worse diseases or greater famines, as some predicted.
4th sign: People are relaxing
People are now less prone to panic, as a Lowy Institute poll confirmed.
In 2006, two in three Australians thought global warming was so serious we should act now, even if it cost us plenty. Five years later, just one in three Australians thought that.
5th sign: The rest of the world is chilling, too
The Gillard Government told us it was not ahead of the world with its carbon tax. Other countries were just as scared of global warming and keen to stop it.
Rubbish. The US still won't agree to a national carbon tax, because voters won't wear it. China, the world's biggest emitter, doesn't have one either.
And Europe, home of the world's biggest carbon trading system, is now so broke and bored with global warming that the price of its permits has fallen to under $5, a fraction of our own $23 a tonne, leaving us looking like mugs.
6th sign: Even Labor hardly seems to care now
If the Gillard Government still believed "climate change is the great moral challenge of our generation", would it have tied our own carbon trading system from 2015 to Europe's, so permits could fall as pathetically low as $5?
Would it now be considering hundreds of millions of dollars in cuts to green schemes in tomorrow's Budget?
7th sign: A bit of warming seems good for us
Global production of wheat, rice and corn have all doubled since 1970, when man-made global warming is said to have really taken off.
Perhaps it's because of better farming. But more warming also means more rain in most places, and more carbon dioxide means more plant food.
8th sign: Warming seems worth the price of getting richer
More carbon dioxide is what we get when lots more people become rich, helping themselves to more electricity and all things that use it.
That is why China's carbon dioxide emissions soared as it dragged hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.
China now produces a quarter of the world's man-made gases and rising. It's the price of progress.
9th sign: "Stopping" warming isn't working
Australians pay a $9 billion-a-year carbon tax and billions more in subsidies for "green" technology.
If we keep paying these billions for the next seven years, what difference will we make to the world's temperature by the end of the century?
Australia's Professor Roger Jones, a warmist, says no more than 0.0038 degrees, and that's even assuming the climate models are right.
10th sign: Sceptical scientists now get a hearing
In 2007, ABC staff protested when the ABC decided to finally show one documentary questioning the warming scare, The Great Global Warming Swindle.
The ABC compromised. The screening was given a hostile introduction and was followed with an even more hostile panel session.
That's how hard it was for sceptical scientists to get a hearing.
That wall is now breaking. Dissent is being heard, with Professor Ian Plimer's sceptical Heaven and Earth alone selling more than 40,000 copies here.
Yes, the world may start warming again. Yes, our emissions may be partly to blame.
But, no, this great scare is unforgivable. It's robbed us of cash and, worse, our reason.
Thank God for the 10 signs that this madness is over.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/signs-that-warming-scare-is-all-hot-air/story-e6frfhqf-1226640600205
on 13-05-2013 02:45 PM
The Alarmists on this forum seem to forget, that they are the minority....lol.
How about attempting to convert the majority to your way of thinking.....
No IPCC hockey stick graphs please..... 😉
on 14-05-2013 12:44 AM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/may/10/carbon-dioxide-highest-level-greenhouse-gas
on 14-05-2013 12:56 AM
I must get up in the morning and HATE HATE HATE
I must HATE the evil abbottabbottabbott
I must HATE the Murdoch press and all their staff
I must HATE any right wing opinion
I must HATE any opinion or view that doesn't agree with my very skewed view of the world
I must HATE and be rude and abusive in all my post
I MUST HATE HATE HATE
Life is so full of HATE for me
What has any of that got to do with global warming. Climate change is not a Labor policy than can be scrapped by Abbott if the Libs win the election. Either it is happening or it isn't and the vast body of scientific evidence suggests that it is. If you choose to disregard that evidence, fine, you are perfectly entitled to argue your case - but argue it on scientific evidence, don't try to justify your opinion by making it a political issue.
on 14-05-2013 06:09 AM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/may/10/carbon-dioxide-highest-level-greenhouse-gas
And? Eaths Co2 levels are at 400 parts per million.
Eaths C02 levels have been higher then 4400 parts per million ( I have also read they have been as high as 7200 parts per million), Earths plant and animal life flourished, and glaciation formed... Earth still went into another Ice Age.
No help from man on those figures, so could ONLY be from natural causes.
Today's Co2 levels seem rather impoverished compared to how high they have been.
on 14-05-2013 09:28 AM
DLA you are the least effective worst informed denier/gullible i've come across here.
the facts are foreign to you, to the point i doubt you know what an actual fact is.
on 14-05-2013 10:26 AM
Really?
What facts are incorrect and why?
I'm sure the majority of skeptics here would love for to you actually back up your statements with real science!!
Low brow name calling doesn't make me wrong, it merely reflects your lake of intelligence.
So...come on.....prove man has caused global warming LL....convert us!
😄
on 14-05-2013 10:27 AM
lake - lack
on 14-05-2013 10:40 AM
Goodness.... the silence is deafening....giggle.
on 14-05-2013 10:54 AM
i would imagine it to be rather quiet in there. .. chortle
on 14-05-2013 11:11 AM
No scientific posts to convert us all with?
No proof that my post is wrong?
Without a hockey stick graph, it seems Alarmists don't have a lot to really say. ?:|
It would seem our forum Alarmists are just full of hot air.......
🙂
Come on.... convert us!!