on 25-09-2015 02:10 PM
Mr Turnbull and Ms Cash were joined by domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty and former Victoria Police commissioner Ken Lay in Melbourne today to announce the package.
Some key aspects of the new package are:
• $17m to expanding existing programs aimed at keeping women safe at the home, including improving access to CCTV and locks.
• $5m to the 1800 RESPECT hotline
• $2m to MensLine services • $21m to help Indigenous women and those in remote communities
• A $12m trial with state governments to use GPS tracking for high-risk domestic violence offenders
• $5m to 20,000 mobile phones across Australia for women whose access to technology is compromised
• $5m to developing and improving the Safe Schools website
• Improved training for frontline services, including general practitioners, doctors, nurse, magistrates and police
• Identifying domestic violence hotspots
Mr T
urnbull said disrespect of women was a key root cause of family violence and needed to be addressed. "This is a big cultural shift," he said. "Of course, the vast majority of men do respect women. But many do not. "We must make it un-Australian to disrespect women. "We must become a country which is known for its respect of women."
25-09-2015 07:46 PM - edited 25-09-2015 07:47 PM
Just seems strange that such a high % is going to such a small % of people ...... Perhaps banning grog, drugs, petrol sniffing, encouraging them to go to school , get a job etc would work better and cost the taxpayer less $$$$ .... Would like to know how this money is going to be spent to fix the prob
on 25-09-2015 07:50 PM
@bushies.girl wrote:Just seems strange that such a high % is going to such a small % of people ...... Perhaps banning grog, drugs, petrol sniffing, encouraging them to go to school , get a job etc would work better and cost the taxpayer less $$$$ .... Would like to know how this money is going to be spent to fix the prob
Yes, but the same for the rest of the distribution. What is it going to "fix"? Absolutely nothing, because they seem to have no clue on what the actual problem is, just throwing money at the end result.
Anyway, no one really gives a toss. 🙂
on 25-09-2015 08:17 PM
Before we get too distracted by the detail, how do these numbers compare with the amounts cut from women's services recently?
on 25-09-2015 08:38 PM
Way to go being a SM groupie.
on 25-09-2015 08:41 PM
@nevynreally wrote:Way to go being a SM groupie.
Sorry? I have no idea what that means?
on 25-09-2015 08:46 PM
on 25-09-2015 08:47 PM
@lurker172602 wrote:
@nevynreally wrote:Way to go being a SM groupie.
Sorry? I have no idea what that means?
yes you do. Hashtag.
Thats okay, it's only serious here if it fits the agenda.
🙂
on 25-09-2015 08:58 PM
@nevynreally wrote:
@lurker172602 wrote:
@nevynreally wrote:Way to go being a SM groupie.
Sorry? I have no idea what that means?
yes you do. Hashtag.
Thats okay, it's only serious here if it fits the agenda.
🙂
Oh ok. I'd forgotten that was there. Still not sure how that's relevant to the topic, or my question?
on 25-09-2015 09:08 PM
RIP Andrea Lehane
on 25-09-2015 09:10 PM
@lurker172602 wrote:
@nevynreally wrote:
@lurker172602 wrote:
@nevynreally wrote:Way to go being a SM groupie.
Sorry? I have no idea what that means?
yes you do. Hashtag.
Thats okay, it's only serious here if it fits the agenda.
🙂
Oh ok. I'd forgotten that was there. Still not sure how that's relevant to the topic, or my question?
You put it there, how long ago? But you can't remember when? Or why?