$100m funding

http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/09/24/06/45/prime-minister-malcolm-turnbull-to-commit-41m-to-t...

 

Mr Turnbull and Ms Cash were joined by domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty and former Victoria Police commissioner Ken Lay in Melbourne today to announce the package.

 

 Some key aspects of the new package are:

 

• $17m to expanding existing programs aimed at keeping women safe at the home, including improving access to CCTV and locks.

 

• $5m to the 1800 RESPECT hotline

 

• $2m to MensLine services • $21m to help Indigenous women and those in remote communities

 

• A $12m trial with state governments to use GPS tracking for high-risk domestic violence offenders

 

• $5m to 20,000 mobile phones across Australia for women whose access to technology is compromised

 

• $5m to developing and improving the Safe Schools website

 

• Improved training for frontline services, including general practitioners, doctors, nurse, magistrates and police

 

• Identifying domestic violence hotspots

 Mr T

urnbull said disrespect of women was a key root cause of family violence and needed to be addressed. "This is a big cultural shift," he said. "Of course, the vast majority of men do respect women. But many do not. "We must make it un-Australian to disrespect women. "We must become a country which is known for its respect of women."

**************************

"There is nothing more; but I want nothing more." Christopher Hitchins
Message 1 of 59
Latest reply
58 REPLIES 58

$100m funding

Just seems strange that such a high %  is going to such a small % of people    ......  Perhaps banning grog, drugs, petrol sniffing, encouraging them to go to school , get a job etc  would work better and cost the taxpayer less $$$$    .... Would like to know how this money is going to be spent to fix the prob   

Message 11 of 59
Latest reply

$100m funding


@bushies.girl wrote:

Just seems strange that such a high %  is going to such a small % of people    ......  Perhaps banning grog, drugs, petrol sniffing, encouraging them to go to school , get a job etc  would work better and cost the taxpayer less $$$$    .... Would like to know how this money is going to be spent to fix the prob   


Yes, but the same for the rest of the distribution. What is it going to "fix"? Absolutely nothing, because they seem to have no clue on what the actual problem is, just throwing money at the end result.

Anyway, no one really gives a toss. 🙂

Message 12 of 59
Latest reply

$100m funding

Before we get too distracted by the detail, how do these numbers compare with the amounts cut from women's services recently?  

Message 13 of 59
Latest reply

$100m funding

Way to go being a SM groupie.

 

Message 14 of 59
Latest reply

$100m funding


@nevynreally wrote:

Way to go being a SM groupie.

 


Sorry?  I have no idea what that means?

Message 15 of 59
Latest reply

$100m funding

Ahhh but it "looks" like they are doing something ....
Message 16 of 59
Latest reply

$100m funding


@lurker172602 wrote:

@nevynreally wrote:

Way to go being a SM groupie.

 


Sorry?  I have no idea what that means?


yes you do. Hashtag.

Thats okay, it's only serious here if it fits the agenda. 

🙂

Message 17 of 59
Latest reply

$100m funding


@nevynreally wrote:

@lurker172602 wrote:

@nevynreally wrote:

Way to go being a SM groupie.

 


Sorry?  I have no idea what that means?


yes you do. Hashtag.

Thats okay, it's only serious here if it fits the agenda. 

🙂


Oh ok.  I'd forgotten that was there.  Still not sure how that's relevant to the topic, or my question?

Message 18 of 59
Latest reply

$100m funding

RIP Andrea Lehane

Message 19 of 59
Latest reply

$100m funding


@lurker172602 wrote:

@nevynreally wrote:

@lurker172602 wrote:

@nevynreally wrote:

Way to go being a SM groupie.

 


Sorry?  I have no idea what that means?


yes you do. Hashtag.

Thats okay, it's only serious here if it fits the agenda. 

🙂


Oh ok.  I'd forgotten that was there.  Still not sure how that's relevant to the topic, or my question?


You put it there, how long ago? But you can't remember when? Or why?

Message 20 of 59
Latest reply