on 10-05-2015 10:51 AM
I volunteer at a regional gallery and get to meet some wonderful, weird and wacky people.
But the ones that get up my goat are the ones who say "That looks like something a 5 year old would do." and expect me to agree with them.
And whilst we have a lot of community exhibitions that are amateurish enough (so perhaps the comment may be fair enough), the comment is usually reserved for iconic artists in major travelling exhibitions who are extremely well known.
Does anyone here like abstract art? And if you really hate it, why?
on 16-05-2015 06:24 PM
Interesting you say that youcandoit because I read something interesting once about a husband and wife collecting team.
She was criticising him because he only collected what he thought would be valuable and a good return on investment. And he was criticising her because she only collected what she thought was interesting and good.
But together both were right as their collection was balanced.
16-05-2015 07:32 PM - edited 16-05-2015 07:33 PM
@youcandoityoucandoityoucandoit wrote:Mmm, interesting..
Maybe for males its also something to do with wanting to appear knowledgeable, but mocking is the knee jerk and first reaction.
And for women, perhaps they are willing to be absorbed by a work of art, to discover what their particular response is, and perhaps they are more willing to experience a work of art again and again before passing judgement?
I understand what you are saying re more guides, more curators and more visitors are women, but more- maybe even most, of the art that is being exhibited and talked about (even here) is produced by men.
And the majority of the biggest art collectors in the world- ie, the ones spending all those millions- are men..
Charles Saatchi
Eli Broad
Leon Black
Stephen Cohen
Donald Rubell
Glenn Fuhrman
Apparently it was 62% in 2014...
Makes you think.
Yes, makes me think; the blokes have all the cash..........
on 16-05-2015 08:09 PM
And that would be because traditionally men earn more in most professions than women, not because they are worth more.
on 16-05-2015 08:17 PM
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:maybe it's because women are more gullible?
oh yes, that old chestnut...
women are...
more gullible
more emotional
more naive
more susceptible
more trusting
more innocent
more unsophisticated
blah blah blah
You make me laugh
on 16-05-2015 09:41 PM
@youcandoityoucandoityoucandoit wrote:
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:maybe it's because women are more gullible?
oh yes, that old chestnut...
women are...
more gullible
more emotional
more naive
more susceptible
more trusting
more innocent
more unsophisticated
blah blah blah
You make me laugh
That's a lot of old chestnuts lol.
on 17-05-2015 07:34 AM
@i-need-a-martini wrote:Or are women more open to new ideas and concepts?
Perhaps women think more before they speak?
I dunno...
I think it may come down to "sensitivity". Artists have "it", and observe and ( paint/play/sculpt) act on "it". I consider that most females have "it".
Over the past, and obviously currently, males were not encouraged to show "it".
Hence the situation where a (hunter/gatherer) he-man, is surrounded by "sensitivity" (art) he finds a need to bring a personal comfort of denying sensitivity and must display bluff and bravado.
OR
It is just a former working class based person trying to attain a better education and can't quite get the "grip" of being middle class on his way up the economic chain.
DEB
on 17-05-2015 07:46 AM
@i-need-a-martini wrote:Interesting you say that youcandoit because I read something interesting once about a husband and wife collecting team.
She was criticising him because he only collected what he thought would be valuable and a good return on investment. And he was criticising her because she only collected what she thought was interesting and good.
But together both were right as their collection was balanced.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_and_Dorothy_Vogel
Was it this couple? Saw a documentary a couple of years ago about them. Below I have found this trailer for it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiyLAlWR95M
DEB
17-05-2015 07:58 AM - edited 17-05-2015 07:59 AM
@lloydslights wrote:
@i-need-a-martini wrote:Interesting you say that youcandoit because I read something interesting once about a husband and wife collecting team.
She was criticising him because he only collected what he thought would be valuable and a good return on investment. And he was criticising her because she only collected what she thought was interesting and good.
But together both were right as their collection was balanced.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_and_Dorothy_Vogel
Was it this couple? Saw a documentary a couple of years ago about them. Below I have found this trailer for it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiyLAlWR95M
DEB
I don't think it was them. They don't sound familiar.
But that trailer looked so good that I have just ordered that DVD on Amazon lol!
on 17-05-2015 09:49 AM
The Vogels- such a great couple, really inspiring. Theres also a second film, based on their donation of 1 work to a public museum in each of the 50 states.
If you get a chance, take a look at the list of artists included in their collection- some of the most amazing abstract and conceptual artists from post 60s are included..another thing that is very interesting about their collection is the domestic scale of the works. They lived with the works, and wanted to see them everyday, they didnt buy as investors, but as lovers of art, and they met a lot of artists and had friendships with them...a very different collection because of their personalities and their need to collect, rather than just acquire because of the works value.
Did you see this in the paper yesterday?
Curious to hear any comments...
on 17-05-2015 10:35 AM
"Hence the situation where a (hunter/gatherer) he-man, is surrounded by "sensitivity" (art) ".
but who drew the cave art? was it men or women?