Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 10:51 AM
I volunteer at a regional gallery and get to meet some wonderful, weird and wacky people.
But the ones that get up my goat are the ones who say "That looks like something a 5 year old would do." and expect me to agree with them.
And whilst we have a lot of community exhibitions that are amateurish enough (so perhaps the comment may be fair enough), the comment is usually reserved for iconic artists in major travelling exhibitions who are extremely well known.
Does anyone here like abstract art? And if you really hate it, why?
Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 04:07 PM
I cater for those who are less astute than you ๐
Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 04:12 PM
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:we went to a gallery once - Canberra I think - one particular piece of ART - a kitchen stool with a wheel on it - took my fancy. When I save up enough money, I might buy that.
edit: Another example of the value of higher education - probably did 6 years at uni to think of that.
Thats pretty funny rabbit- 'almost' remembering a Duchamp..
Pity. I see your mockery..
Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 05:41 PM
re. It looks like a 5 yr old has done it ...
"Fiction is the lie through which we tell the truth."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disumbrationism
http://blogs.artinfo.com/lacmonfire/2014/03/06/the-man-who-hated-futurism/
The front page headline of the August 14, 1927, Los Angeles Times read INTERNATIONAL ART HOAX BARED BY LOS ANGELES AUTHOR.
The story revealed that the modern art movement known as โDisumbrationismโ was a complete fraudโa โremarkable revenge put over on Futurist critics.โ (Above, one of that faux-movementโs masterworks: Pavel Jerdanowitchโs Illumination, c. 1926.)
Paul Jordan Smith was an L.A. Times journalist and author. His wife, Sarah Bixby Smith, was an amateur painter whose work was rejected for a exhibition at Claremont.
The judges faulted it for being too conservative.
This provoked her husband, who had no artistic training, to paint โa weird futuristic-**bleep**-impressionist-**bleep**-kindergarten canvas in riotous color.โ
Inspired by Gauguin, the painting presents a Polynesian woman holding a banana, โprimitiveโ in drawing and uncomfortable stereotype.
The Times account says that Smith initially used the painting as a firescreen.
Then he decided to enter the painting in an exhibition of โindependentsโ being held at New Yorkโs Waldorf-Astoria hotel in spring 1925. He submitted under the name โPavel Jerdanowitchโ and titled the painting โExaltation.โ
As this was a selling exhibition, he put โan impossible price on itโฆ he did not want to trap any innocent buyer.โ
He made a suitably dark and brooding photograph of himself as Jerdanowitch, and submitted the work to the same group of critics as representative of the new school, "Disumbrationism".
He explained "Exaltation" as a symbol of "breaking the shackles of womanhood.
To his dismay, if not to his surprise, the Disumbrationist daub won praise from the critics who had belittled his wife's realistic painting.
More Disumbrationist paintings followed: a composition of zig-zag lines and eyeballs he called "Illumination"; a garish picture of a black woman doing laundry which he called "Aspiration", and which a critic praised as "a delightful jumble of Gauguin, Pop Hart and Negro minstrelsy, with a lot of Jerdanowitch individuality"; "Gination", an ugly, lopsided portrait; and a painting named "Adoration", of a woman worshipping an immense phallic idol, which was exhibited in 1927.
The same year, Jordan-Smith confessed to the Los Angeles Times that the Disumbrationist paintings were meant as a spoof.
Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 06:19 PM
The art world can be very fickle and elitist. It is interesting to see how Impressionism was first viewed, and how Manet was at first laughed at.
This makes an interesting read for those who are interested...
http://www.impressionism.org/teachimpress/browse/aboutimpress.htm
Although some people appreciated the new paintings, many did not. The critics and the public agreed the Impressionists couldnโt draw and their colors were considered vulgar. Their compositions were strange. Their short, slapdash brushstrokes made their paintings practically illegible. Why didnโt these artists take the time to finish their canvases, viewers wondered?
Indeed, Impressionism broke every rule of the French Academy of Fine Arts, the conservative school that had dominated art training and taste since 1648. Impressionist scenes of modern urban and country life were a far cry from the Academic efforts to teach moral lessons through historic, mythological, and Biblical themes.,,,,,,,,,
Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 06:47 PM
@youcandoityoucandoityoucandoit wrote:
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:we went to a gallery once - Canberra I think - one particular piece of ART - a kitchen stool with a wheel on it - took my fancy. When I save up enough money, I might buy that.
edit: Another example of the value of higher education - probably did 6 years at uni to think of that.
Thats pretty funny rabbit- 'almost' remembering a Duchamp..
Pity. I see your mockery..
You mean to tell me that would require an artistic temperament and training??
Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 06:48 PM
This is a good friend's daughters art. I admire her skill and creativity. She is also an excellent writer and songstress
http://www.ambercarbury.com/2014.html
Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 06:51 PM
@colic2bullsgirlore wrote:
This is a good friend's daughters art. I admire her skill and creativity. She is also an excellent writer and songstress
http://www.ambercarbury.com/2014.html
Yes, very nice. You can see what they are.
Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 06:56 PM
he also seems to have facination with urinals and hat racks.
Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 07:00 PM
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:
An upside down parked unicycle with peddals stolen
Abstract Art - why talk about it if you don't get it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ10-05-2015 07:00 PM
@i-need-a-martini wrote:
But the ones that get up my goat are the ones who say "That looks like something a 5 year old would do." and expect me to agree with them.
I think you should ring the RSPCA.

