Alarmist David Suzuki - a "complete know-nothing"

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

After watching Q & A  with David Suzuki....I am starting to  feel kind of sorry for Alarmists....

David Suzuki also had to admit  he was wrong..lol.

http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/txt/s3841115.htm

"David Suzuki on the very first question is revealed as a complete know-nothing. His questioner tells him that the main climate

data sets show no real warming for some 15 years.

Suzuki asks for the references, which he should have known if he knew anything of the science.

His questioner then lists them: UAH, RSS, HadCrut and GISS - four of the most basic measurement systems of global

temperature.

Suzuki asks what they are.

Anyone interested in global warming should know right there that Suzuki has absolutely no understanding of what he is talking

about...

For Example - 

Challenged from the floor by Professor Stewart Franks, Suzuki admits he might have been mistaken in claiming global warming

was causing more cyclones, which he blamed for killing the Great Barrier Reef. He blames some Australian for “suggesting” it to

him. The truth, as I’ve noted before, is easily found on the Bureau of Meteorology website:.."

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/suzuki_revealed_as_comple...

Between Tim Flannery and David Suzuki, it must be very embarrassing time to be an Alarmist......lol.

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

---

@monman12 wrote:

SA, with your silence on my desire to read "your"  alleged  Washington Post 1971, apropos Hansen,  article which you have  been,  not unexpectedly,  unable to substantiate , I take it that we continue to view all your definitive posts with the same disbelief,   compounded  with your lack of knowledge of the Scientific Method.

nɥºɾ

---

  ....lol...my silence?....it is your opinion that the article does not exist. 

 Have you found a copy of the 1971 Washington Post  to check?....... No would be the answer there.

 MM...let's not forget the fact that  you posted the "Hockey Stick Graph" ............Hilarious!....

You've never proved that man made c02 has caused global warming.........

You've had zero credibility ever since.......   So......don't like my posts?.....I don't mind......after all...you did post the

hockey stick graph.....giggle..

Alarmists base all their ideas on failed, fundamentally flawed computer models.

Create dud predictions, and refuse to see real observations.

.." We are now at the point in the age of global warming hysteria where the IPCC global warming theory has crashed into the

hard reality of observations..." Dr Roy Spencer.

When will the IPCC become dismantled?........

Poor Alarmists......

[monman12]

 SA: "....lol...my silence?....it is your opinion that the article does not exist."

You mean the supposed 1971 Washington Post article you definitively referred to SA? because I know the article/comment was first made 15th Jan 2013,  not as you have  deliberately and incorrectly stated. 1971

SA: " Have you found a copy of the 1971 Washington Post  to check?....... No would be the answer there"

Finally you have made a correct statement, of course I can not find a copy of the manufactured Hansen statement to check, back then,  because it never existed.

However SA , as you have definitively  stated that the article  "actually appeared in a 1971 Washington Post article that warns of an impending ice age within 50 years"
It is incumbent upon you to produce the evidence to back up your comment, because readers might think you are "manipulating " the truth somewhat!  In the meantime  I take it that we continue to view all your definitive posts with the same disbelief,   compounded by  your lack of knowledge of the Scientific Method.

Answer the 1971 Washington Post  Wafflegate question first, and then I can address your many camouflage comments later.

nɥºɾ

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

*Yawn*....keep running in circles MM......

After all....that is what Alarmists do....