on 24-09-2013 03:34 PM
After watching Q & A with David Suzuki....I am starting to feel kind of sorry for Alarmists....
David Suzuki also had to admit he was wrong..lol.
http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/txt/s3841115.htm
"David Suzuki on the very first question is revealed as a complete know-nothing. His questioner tells him that the main climate
data sets show no real warming for some 15 years.
Suzuki asks for the references, which he should have known if he knew anything of the science.
His questioner then lists them: UAH, RSS, HadCrut and GISS - four of the most basic measurement systems of global
temperature.
Suzuki asks what they are.
Anyone interested in global warming should know right there that Suzuki has absolutely no understanding of what he is talking
about...
For Example -
Challenged from the floor by Professor Stewart Franks, Suzuki admits he might have been mistaken in claiming global warming
was causing more cyclones, which he blamed for killing the Great Barrier Reef. He blames some Australian for “suggesting” it to
him. The truth, as I’ve noted before, is easily found on the Bureau of Meteorology website:.."
Between Tim Flannery and David Suzuki, it must be very embarrassing time to be an Alarmist......lol.
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 24-09-2013 03:57 PM
I tried to click on REPLY & instead gave KUDO
on 24-09-2013 03:58 PM
Yet didn't reply to the topic.......typical Alarmist.............
on 24-09-2013 04:00 PM
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:Between Tim Flannery and David Suzuki, it must be a very embarrassing time to be an Alarmist......lol.
When Alarmisim is completely dead..... I do hope you find a new fairytale to believe in.....
Like 'sovereign borders ' or 'direct action'
facts have a way of enduring, Bleep just fades away.. bye.
on 24-09-2013 04:02 PM
@***super_nova*** wrote:I tried to click on REPLY & instead gave KUDO
not to worry, being fooled so badly is sufficient a price. let them have the kudo ..
on 24-09-2013 04:06 PM
Really?...it is the Alarmists that are being fooled by Tim Flannery and David Suzuki................
on 24-09-2013 04:09 PM
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
David Suzuki also had to admit he was wrong..lol.
Well, yes, scientists often admit that they are not clairvoyant, and sometimes things do not turn out quite the way they expected. But the deniers are always right, aren't you?
Also David Suzuki admitted that he did not know because the question that was asked was about the IPCC report that has not been properly released. You and your sources got their information from the gutter press in UK. and it is totally wrong. It has been already disputed, and as usual, the acknowledgement that they were wrong although printed was few lines somewhere on back page. But of-course, you missed that.
Reports on leaked IPCC study like a bad game of Chinese whispers
What do you get when cross a game of Chinese whispers, an ideologically-driven section of the press, a failure to check facts and the absence of a time machine?
You get the latest shambles in climate change reporting that has unnecessarily left people confused and misled about the true state of climate change science and the risks of pumping fossil fuels into the atmosphere.
on 24-09-2013 04:09 PM
on 24-09-2013 04:10 PM
@lakeland27 wrote:
@***super_nova*** wrote:I tried to click on REPLY & instead gave KUDO
not to worry, being fooled so badly is sufficient a price. let them have the kudo ..
Is there way to un-kudo?
on 24-09-2013 04:15 PM
Yes, you click on the options button at the top of the post and you can remove the kudo.
on 24-09-2013 04:17 PM
@donnashuggy wrote:Are you upset because he accused Tony Abbott of wilful blindness?
I really don't mind what he says about Tony Abbott.....