Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?

ACCC chairman Sims argues the benefits of privatisation

 

An article in this morning's Australian Financial Review, based on an interview with Mr Sims, says that he has called for Federal Government to sell Medibank Private and Australia Post.

However, Mr Sims has told News Radio that he was not advocating for the sale of particular Government-owned businesses.

 

"Australia Post, that's really an issue for government, I was making a general point this morning, and I'll really leave it at that," he told News Radio's Marius Benson.

 

"I think there are direct experiences you can draw from the energy sector, but I've really got no parallel from which to comment on Australia Post, or Medibank Private for that matter.

 

"Mr Sims adds, however, that the only good reason for government ownership is because it has particular social objectives in mind.

"If all you're after is maximum efficiency then there's no question that you'd have those assets owned by the private sector," he argued.

"If you're continuing to own them by government, then that's because you've got some social objective to achieve."If you have a social objective, it's worth specifying what that is, and I suspect there's probably more direct ways to achieve that social objective".

 

 Martin O'Nea, the national assistant secretary of the Communication Workers Union says " Australia Post hasreturned more than $800 million in dividends to taxpayers over the past three years.

 

He also warns that Australia Post's less profitable but socially useful services, such as relatively affordable and timely mail and parcel deliveries to rural and regional Australia, would likely suffer if it was privatised

 

."With a privatised Australia Post, would them services that people have seen in the past three years remain the same?" Mr O'Nea asked rhetorically."We'd venture that the experience that regional and rural Australia have had with privatisation in the past would leave them to believe that it certainly wouldn't.

"That is a view shared by the Post Office Agents Association Limited, which represents the owners and operators of licensed post offices, which make up around 75 per cent of Australia Post's network.

 

"A privatised postal operator would focus on the main population centres at the expense of customers in rural Australia," said its chief executive Ian Kerr.

 

The association says it received assurances from both major parties ahead of last year's federal election that neither had plans to privatise Australia Post.

 

The Government has launched a scoping study into the possible sale of Medibank Private, which is due to report next month.

 

Click Here To View Entire Article

 

Poor Aussies, so far in debt we'll have to sell off our remaining assets soon, and then how will we repay our loans if all our jobs go overseas or to foreign workers?

 

 

Message 1 of 107
Latest reply
106 REPLIES 106

Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?

manageable as in...wer'e at least paying the interest?

 

or manageable as in...we have to sell of assets and rights to our resouces to pay it off?

Message 21 of 107
Latest reply

Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?


@icyfroth wrote:

manageable as in...wer'e at least paying the interest?

 

or manageable as in...we have to sell of assets and rights to our resouces to pay it off?


we dont have to sell any of it . the rush to do so is a conservative article of faith, ' it should be private so one of us can profit from it'

its not about debt at all.

Message 22 of 107
Latest reply

Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?


@icyfroth wrote:

manageable as in...wer'e at least paying the interest?

 

or manageable as in...we have to sell of assets and rights to our resouces to pay it off?


We don't HAVE to sell off the assets.  We can manage the resources and the assets. They generate income.

 

Do people sell their houses just to pay off their mortgage if they can afford the mortgage payments? 

Message 23 of 107
Latest reply

Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?

if our debt is manageable, then why do we need more?


Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
Message 24 of 107
Latest reply

Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?


@freakiness wrote:

@icyfroth wrote:

manageable as in...wer'e at least paying the interest?

 

or manageable as in...we have to sell of assets and rights to our resouces to pay it off?


We don't HAVE to sell off the assets.  We can manage the resources and the assets. They generate income.

 

Do people sell their houses just to pay off their mortgage if they can afford the mortgage payments? 


Hopefully not.

But if they have to take out more credit to finance their living expenses, and then more credit to cover the re-payments of that loan, ran up against circumstances beyond their control and got over their heads, defaulte on their loan, perhaps that would be their only option. 

Message 25 of 107
Latest reply

Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?

So why doesn't abbott just STOP THE WASTE like he promised?

Photobucket
Message 26 of 107
Latest reply

Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?

Pity we can't privatise the government.Or can we? 🙂
Message 27 of 107
Latest reply

Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?


@donnashuggy wrote:

So why doesn't abbott just STOP THE WASTE like he promised?


do you think it's that easy?

Message 28 of 107
Latest reply

Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?


@freakiness wrote:

@icyfroth wrote:

manageable as in...wer'e at least paying the interest?

 

or manageable as in...we have to sell of assets and rights to our resouces to pay it off?


We don't HAVE to sell off the assets.  We can manage the resources and the assets. They generate income.

 

Do people sell their houses just to pay off their mortgage if they can afford the mortgage payments? 


sometimes, they do. sometimes they sell a house and buy a smaller more manageable one (replace it with a cheaper version that still 'suits the needs", maybe in a different, lower socio economic area

 

But generally, they take steps to either generate more money or cut expenditure. They might get another job (increase income), sell off an insignificant asset (by comparison) or they might change jobs to facillitate a higher source of revenue ior greater flexibility etc.

 

But I would say, that they do everything that they can to cut expenditure.

 

Now this might mean initially outlaying money for a solar heater in order to reduce energy bills, or "improving" a vacant block (a vacant block costs money but earns nothing, but if I put a house on that block of land, I can now rent it out and raise income. Subdividing their land... etc etc,

 

but I do know that borrowing more money to pay the existing debt is not the way to go. It might even come to having to "wipe the slate, cut the bleeding and start again from scratch.

 

These same principals work at every level of society. From individuals, to businesses, companies, states and then the entire country. It's a matter of weioghing up the opportunity costs. "What do I have to give up, tio get what I need or want". (there are formulas that gives this a value and determines the economic viability to facilitate a comparison)


Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
Message 29 of 107
Latest reply

Australia Post and Medibank To Be Sold Off?

Absolutely I do, I can start a thread about it

Photobucket
Message 30 of 107
Latest reply