on 15-01-2015 01:56 PM
on 16-01-2015 10:23 PM
am*3 replied to:
"I contunually find it staggering, how the Australian public love to unmercilessly bag their elected leaders"
am*3 followed up:
"Would you rather live in a country like Laos? Seeing as we don't, we live in Australia, openly criticising any current Govt is perfectly normal and it doesn't result in getting thrown in jail or worse."
I think you may be better off addressing this to evil_akuma_2002. After all he wrote the first comment.
on 16-01-2015 10:28 PM
I think she did, it's just the forum has a peculiar way of indicating the post is in answer to the most recent poster, which might not have been posted when the person started writing their post.
on 16-01-2015 10:30 PM
tezza - I just clicked on reply to the last msg, which happened to be yours. evil-ak figured out it was a reply to him as I quoted part of his post.
16-01-2015 10:34 PM - edited 16-01-2015 10:36 PM
Bit of a silly question there,am*3?
Of course I'd rather Australia.
If you see it like that. Maybe not you, but several posters get anti when others criticise the current Govt. As I pointed out to you and them in the past, there is nothing wrong with doing that in Australia if people feel the need to. If political posts are still available to read on CS, it means they didn't contravene any posting rules therefore I don't see why anyone needs to complain about them ( especially to say we should not be bagging out a Prime Minister etc).
As Gllee pointed out TA was the most aggressive Opposition Leader ever, his followers lapped it up. He lowered the bar. Now the shoe is on the other foot, they can't hack it.
on 16-01-2015 10:40 PM
@am*3 wrote:Bit of a silly question there,am*3?
Of course I'd rather Australia.
If you see it like that. Maybe not you, but several posters get anti when others criticise the current Govt. As I pointed out to you and them in the past, there is nothing wrong with doing that in Australia if people feel the need to. If political posts are still available to read on CS, it means they didn't contravene any posting rules therefore I don't see why anyone needs to complain about them ( especially to say we should not be bagging out a Prime Minister etc).
As Gllee pointed out TA was the most aggressive Opposition Leader ever, his followers lapped it up. He lowered the bar. Now the shoe is on the other foot, they can't hack it.
It's all rather funny when you consider the tone of the many threads per day which were started to attack, and defame Gillard.
on 17-01-2015 02:14 PM
on 17-01-2015 02:36 PM
on 27-02-2015 12:16 PM
ANOTHER LABOR BACK FLIP
Metadata retention laws will pass as Labor folds
The Federal Government's controversial $400 million plan to force telecommunications providers to store the metadata of all phone and internet users for two years will go ahead after the Labor party agreed to support the move.
The worst opposition in history just got worse.
We hardly hear a peep out of Shorten and now we get another back flip.
The Pressure must be too much for him.
on 27-02-2015 12:21 PM
on 27-02-2015 12:28 PM