on 23-08-2014 01:21 PM
How much can we rely on data adjustments by people convinced the evidence should show a warming?
Researcher Jennifer Marohasy ... has analysed the raw data from dozens of locations across Australia and matched it against the new data used by BOM showing that temperatures were progressively warming.
In many cases, Dr Marohasy said, temperature trends had changed from slight cooling to dramatic warming over 100 years.
BOM has rejected Dr Marohasy’s claims and said the agency had used world’s best practice and a peer reviewed process to modify the physical temperature records that had been recorded at weather stations across the country.
It said data from a selection of weather stations underwent a process known as “homogenisation” to correct for anomalies.
US measured temperature data (blue below) shows that we have been cooling for nearly a century. But the temperatures reported by NCDC (red below) show the opposite, that the US is warming…
They accomplish this transition by an impressive 1.6 degrees of data tampering, which cools the past and warms the present.
on 23-08-2014 04:51 PM
god, talk about desperation, draggingout conspiracy theories now......ho hum
on 23-08-2014 04:57 PM
is that story from another Murdoch paper?
winter was apparently 2 degees warmer this year in Melb. according channel 9's weather report last night
on 23-08-2014 05:02 PM
Bom admit to their practices......
It's interesting that you declare their transparency as a conspiracy theory......lol.
on 23-08-2014 05:07 PM
Re the BOM--im concerned about the ads-when i go to the radar sites.
Its a government department-should be advertisement free..............Richo.
on 23-08-2014 05:17 PM
@debra9275 wrote:is that story from another Murdoch paper?
winter was apparently 2 degees warmer this year in Melb. according channel 9's weather report last night
obviously channel 9 is owned and run by communist socialist pinko lefty types, what an outrage, someone should let uncle rupes know - then the bolter and jones could run smear campaigns against channel 9 for being not on Team Australia.
on 23-08-2014 05:20 PM
23-08-2014 05:33 PM - edited 23-08-2014 05:37 PM
to nero
@paintsew007 wrote:ref .. Most of the weather information provided by The Weather Company originates from the Commonwealth Bureau of Meteorology.
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
But as I pointed out-I thought obviously......not all
nero ; True and as weatherzeone says Bureau of Meteorology information is typically combined with other content and information generated by The Weather Company's meteorologists to form a complete package for the client.
and yes I do prefer their reports to BOM as well
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
paintsew: too much altering/combining dare i say convenient 'fudging' of data by govt met dept IMO
23-08-2014 05:40 PM - edited 23-08-2014 05:40 PM
and for the 'record'.....I have found the elders weather site far more TRUTHFUL and hence reliable then either WeatherZone or BOM sites.....
on 23-08-2014 05:42 PM
this is interesting Nero
"Australian Environment Foundation Ltd
— ASIC, 2005"
was registered with ASIC. Back then its
" principal place of business
— ASIC, 2005"
was the
"Institute of Public Affairs ...
Collins Street Melbourne
— ASIC, 2005"
One of its founding directors was
"Jennifer Joyce Marohasy
— ASIC, 2005"
Dr Marohasy is no longer a director of the AEF; its current executive director, Max Rheese, tells Media Watch that its connections with the IPA are now
"Nil
— Max Rheese, Executive Director, AEF, 8th March, 2012"
In 2008, the AEF launched a subsidiary organisation called the Australian Climate Science Coalition.
On its Scientific Advisory Panel are some of Australia's most prominent climate change sceptics
According to accounts filed with ASIC in the 2009 and 2010 financial years, the Australian CSC received almost all its funding - more than $100,000 - from a sister organisation in the United States, the
"American CSC
— ASIC, AEF Financial Report 2009-10"
That means that an American climate change sceptic group has been the largest single contributor not just to the ACSC but through it, to the AEF.
Climate change scepticism isn't the only position that sets the AEF apart from most environmental lobby groups.
Speakers at its conferences have been, for example, hostile to wind power, against reducing water allocations to irrigators, in favour of genetically modified crops, and supportive of the timber industry and the Tasmanian pulp mill.
Small wonder that in the two years when it declared them, the AEF's conference sponsors included...