on 31-12-2013 09:21 AM
THE unprecedented cost of energy driven by the renewable energy target and the carbon tax had destroyed the nation's competitiveness, Tony Abbott's chief business adviser has declared.
Maurice Newman also says climate change policies driven by "scientific delusion" have been a major factor in the collapse of Australia's manufacturing sector. "The Australian dollar and industrial relations policies are blamed," Mr Newman said. "But, for some manufacturers, the strong dollar has been a benefit, while high relative wages have long been a feature of the Australian industrial landscape."
In an interview, Mr Newman said protection of climate change policies and the renewable energy industry by various state governments smacked of a "cover-up".
He said an upcoming review of the renewable energy target must include examination of claims made in federal parliament that millions of dollars were being paid to renewable energy projects that allegedly did not meet planning guidelines. Mr Newman's comments follow those of Dow Chemicals chairman and chief executive Andrew Liveris, who said Australia was losing its natural advantage of abundant and cheap energy.
"As far as new investments go, our primary energy sources of natural gas and electricity are now or will soon become negatives to any comparative calculation," Mr Liveris said.
"Average prices of electricity have doubled in most states in recent years and the unprecedented contraction in consumption threatens a 'death spiral' in which falling consumption pushes up prices even further, causing further falls in consumption," he said.
Mr Newman said Australia had become "hostage to climate-change madness". "And for all the propaganda about 'green employment', Australia seems to be living the European experience, where, for every 'green' job created, two to three jobs are lost in the real economy," he said.
"The scientific delusion, the religion behind the climate crusade, is crumbling. Global temperatures have gone nowhere for 17 years.
Now, credible German scientists claim that 'the global temperature will drop until 2100 to a value corresponding to the little ice age of 1870'."
Mr Newman said the climate change establishment, through the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, remained "intent on exploiting the masses and extracting more money".
"When necessary, the IPCC resorts to dishonesty and deceit," he said.
In Australia, Mr Newman said, Victorian Democratic Labour Party senator John Madigan had told parliament how politicians and bureaucrats were paying tens of millions of dollars annually to wind turbine operators that had not received final planning approval.
"It could be hundreds of millions of dollars and we have a government that is keen to rein in the budget deficit," he said. "If you can save a million dollars that should never have been spent, we should be doing it."
Senator Madigan said the issuing of renewable energy certificates to one of the non-compliant wind farms, at Waubra in Victoria, reflected "a culture of noncompliance arising from systematic regulatory failure that impacts every wind farm in Victoria".
He said the issue involved "the pain and suffering of little people living in rural Australia, environmental damage, fraud on a grand scale, deception, lies and concealment".
The clean energy regulator has defended the decision to allow the Waubra wind farm to receive renewable energy certificates.
Mr Newman's comments came as the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission revealed that in the 18 months since the carbon tax commenced, it had received 3132 complaints and inquiries in relation to carbon price matters.
The Coalition has committed to bolstering the watchdog's powers, with additional funding and new penalties to ensure that companies lower energy costs after the repeal of the carbon tax laws.
on 31-12-2013 11:43 AM
@nero_wulf wrote:You got that wrong didnt you... Blame Bill and your wonderful green/labor/watermelon party.
SANTA ABBOTT’S $55O GIFT? HO, HO!
http://thehoopla.com.au/santa-abbotts-55o-xmas-ho-ho-ho/
on 31-12-2013 12:24 PM
Whilst the figures are undeniably there, to show that the CT did in fact add to costs, its proportion to other factors leading to manufacturing's demise pales into relative insignificance. Power companies themselves have increased power costs (profit margins) mulitple times that of the CT's effect.
Many other things sealed the death of industry here long ago.
on 31-12-2013 12:54 PM
@the_hawk* wrote:
super nover the exodus started when tariffs were removed from imports to create a so called level playing field.
Australia just removed the tariffs and gave no thought to industry.
I remember in early 1970s number of my friends who owned manufacturing companies started to worry about their competitors going to Asia and outcompeting them. One in particular, went from about 100 employees down to 10; the manufactured goods were brought from their factory in Thailand (?) and all that was done here was that it was "finished" & packaged, and as such under the law then it could have Made in AU sticker. Then by the 1980s my friends all moved o/s or retired closing the business.
31-12-2013 12:55 PM - edited 31-12-2013 12:58 PM
LL: ".....not even a good try. nobody with any understanding who's witnessed this exodus would conclude efforts to control carbon have made any difference. i realise this is an excuse for the current govts inability to do anything for the manufacturing sector,...."
Come on LL, manufacturing has been in decline for many years , attempting to blame the current government is the same type of myopic/partial argument as SRBA choosing the 1998 global temperature ( intense El Niño) as a starting data point to prove the world is now not warming.
As with predicted global warming, where the loss of of manufacturing capability/competitiveness is concerned (inevitable), the appropriate term is : ADAPT.
on 31-12-2013 01:03 PM
@monman12 wrote:LL: ".....not even a good try. nobody with any understanding who's witnessed this exodus would conclude efforts to control carbon have made any difference. i realise this is an excuse for the current govts inability to do anything for the manufacturing sector,...."
Come on LL, manufacturing has been in decline for many years , attempting to blame the current government is the same type of myopic/partial argument as SRBA choosing the 1998 global temperature ( intense El Niño) as a starting data point to prove the world is now not warming.
As with predicted global warming, where the loss of of manufacturing capability/competitiveness is concerned (inevitable), the appropriate term is : ADAPT.
you misunderstand. i don't blame this government, i merely anticipate on current form that they will keep blaming the former government. something patently false.
on 31-12-2013 01:25 PM
on 31-12-2013 01:41 PM
not that furphy again. it doesn't hold up or indeed may any sense. parrot -like repetition won't make it fact either. it simply sounds more foolish with every repeat.
on 31-12-2013 01:49 PM
on 02-01-2014 10:41 PM
@lakeland27 wrote:not that furphy again. it doesn't hold up or indeed may any sense. parrot -like repetition won't make it fact either. it simply sounds more foolish with every repeat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ_KFTC8pJU
on 02-01-2014 11:15 PM
manufacturing died in Australia because the unions pushed the wages too high to make it competitive.