on 03-01-2013 07:45 AM
THE Families Minister, Jenny Macklin, has angered welfare groups by claiming she could live on the $35-a-day Newstart allowance.
Ms Macklin made the comments on the day that more than 80,000 single parents were shifted from the parenting payment to the lower Newstart allowance, leaving some up to $110 a week worse off.
Visiting a Melbourne hospital to promote the government's Dad and Partner pay scheme, which also began yesterday, Ms Macklin was asked whether she could survive on the $246 a week payment. She said: ''I could'' but the question and Ms Macklin's answer were recorded as ''inaudible'' in a transcript of the news conference later issued by her office.
Claims she could live on $35 a day ... the Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Jenny Macklin. Photo: Craig Sillitoe
A spokeswoman for Ms Macklin said the exchange had not been deliberately omitted but the transcript had been produced from a smartphone recording of an outdoor news conference. ''We provide the best quality transcripts available to us to help inform the media,'' the spokeswoman said.
Advertisement
''Of course the media also attend and record on high-quality professional devices.''
As a cabinet minister, Ms Macklin earns $6321 a week, 25 times the rate of Newstart.
The cost of renting alone in her Melbourne suburb of Ivanhoe is greater than the Newstart allowance, with the median rent for a one-bedroom flat $270 a week.
The chief executive of the Australian Council of Social Service, Cassandra Goldie, said evidence to three parliamentary inquiries had shown the allowance had not increased in real terms in two decades and, as a result, some recipients were forced to live in ''extreme poverty''.
''The minister should look at the evidence of people who are trying to do that,'' she said.
The vice-president of the National Welfare Rights Network, Kate Beaumont, said Ms Macklin's comments were ''surprising''. They seemed at odds with those of Labor senators who, in a committee report in November, had called for the allowance to be increased, she said.
Calls by welfare groups for Newstart to be lifted have been echoed by others including the Business Council of Australia, which has warned it may be entrenching poverty, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development which, in 2010, said the payment was so low it might not be enough to enable a person to look for a job.
The government has also faced strong criticism for the changes which shift thousands of single parents from the parenting payment to the Newstart allowance when their youngest child turns eight.
While parents who started receiving the payment after July 2006 already face these conditions, until now those who were receiving the parenting payment before July 2006 were able to keep it until their youngest turned 16.
Ms Macklin said the parenting payment changes were about ensuring all parenting payment recipients were treated the same.
''What's important for people who are unemployed is that we do everything possible … to help people get into work and that's what we'll be doing with these single parents as well,'' she said.
''The more people going back to work the better. It's better for the family. It's great to see mum and/or dad going … to work. Unfortunately, we have far too many children growing up in families where nobody is working.''
The change will have the greatest impact on parents who work part-time because parenting payment recipients are allowed to earn more than Newstart recipients before their payments are affected. As a result of the change, a single parent who gets no income from work will be $115 worse off a fortnight, while those who earn $400 a week from work will see their income drop by $223 a fortnight.
on 03-01-2013 09:38 AM
This thing with Jenny Macklin has really cheesed me off because of what the Labor party have done with the transcripts...
They said they made her comments inaudible because the iPhone recording could not be heard properly.... but when The Australian managed to listen to it they said it was fine... so once again the Labor Party has manipulated transcripts to delete what their ministers have said so that in history it can't be read....
I appreciate the journalists that have made the effort to use the transcripts provided and have discovered these "inaccuracies" and I think people should be disgusted with this behaviour...
Did you watch the interview?
It was barely audible.... keeping in mind that an audio recording is harder to read than a video recording.
on 03-01-2013 09:41 AM
thats just another example of the way they have governed this country.
lies, manipulation and it doesnt help that the PM is so corrupt.
Please enlighten us. Exactly how is the PM corrupt?
It was not even this gov that changed the system so that most people get transferred to Newstart before their yongest is 16.
on 03-01-2013 09:44 AM
Did you watch the interview?
It was barely audible.... keeping in mind that an audio recording is harder to read than a video recording.
Ms Macklin's office yesterday at first ignored requests to hand over a recording used for a transcript omitting the gaffe, which was claimed to be inaudible, but was found to be audible.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/families-minister-wants-reform-of-dole/story-fn59niix-1226546768266
on 03-01-2013 09:45 AM
So what else do they get?
How much does a single parent get each week to survive on?
I don't know, look at the website.
I'm guessing they can study or do what anyone else can on Newstart. I am not saying I like it but if they let one group stay on the higher rate they would have to increase it for all. The ones that started after 2006 already get the new deal.
on 03-01-2013 09:46 AM
Please enlighten us. Exactly how is the PM corrupt?
It was not even this gov that changed the system so that most people get transferred to Newstart before their yongest is 16.
Howard introduced the initial changes BUT the big difference was that you could stay on the payment until you left... once you got a job and lost the payment you could not get back onto that payment...
He did not force anyone off the payment...
on 03-01-2013 09:47 AM
Ms Macklin's office yesterday at first ignored requests to hand over a recording used for a transcript omitting the gaffe, which was claimed to be inaudible, but was found to be audible.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/families-minister-wants-reform-of-dole/story-fn59niix-1226546768266
Who cares what News Corp say. Did you watch the interview?
on 03-01-2013 09:48 AM
He did not force anyone off the payment...
no, he created a two tier system where those that did not bother to look for work got to keep a higher rate than those who did.
on 03-01-2013 09:53 AM
Yes I watched it and I heard every word she said.... what The Australian lied about hearing the audio????
hahahahahahahahahaha
on 03-01-2013 09:56 AM
no, he created a two tier system where those that did not bother to look for work got to keep a higher rate than those who did.
You know nothing... really..... nothing...
This was introduced when my kids were little...
I had to look for work once my youngest turned 6 and went to school... not only that but great incentives were introduced for businesses to employ me... if not for this great incentive I doubt many businesses would have employed a person that had to leave at 3pm to pick their child up as there was no public transport for my kids to get home and no after school care...
It was the best thing for me and even though when I became sick and unemployable again I understood that I would not get the old payment but I was only out by about $100 per fortnight... not too bad... I worked with it.
on 03-01-2013 09:56 AM
Yes I watched it and I heard every word she said.... what The Australian lied about hearing the audio????
hahahahahahahahahaha
No I didn't say the Oz is lying, although they are known for twisting things. In interviews like that there are often inaudible bits in the transcript, regardless who is speaking.
The interview was not about living on the dole it was about changing the PP so all get the same. Parents don't have to live on the dole amount with their kids. They get extra payments so the question was stupid oin the context.