on โ05-03-2015 06:30 PM
What group would you start with?
on โ05-03-2015 07:26 PM
on โ05-03-2015 07:28 PM
on โ05-03-2015 07:30 PM
@i-need-a-martini wrote:
@poddster wrote:Think it through Martinus
I actually did think it through. As I do all things.
I had a shortlist. On the face of it, yes, there are a few 'group's I think could go on the list.
But in the end I decided that no-one has the right to remove the life another being (no matter how evil they are perceived at the time) for a variety of different reasons looked at from different angles.
Take paedophiles. Do we cull paedophiles after they commit a crime? How would it help the victims? How does justice get served when the perpetrator is blissfully dead and out of their own miserable existence? Perhaps it would be useful to "cull" them before they commit a crime as then there are no consequences for anyone else. But our chances of pinpoiting a paedophile before their crime is a little remote isn't it?
they would not inflict their perversity on any more victims would they!
One midle east country used to cut of the predomant hand for stealing the first time.
Then the other hand on the second time and the head the third time.
No one offended more than three times.
on โ05-03-2015 07:31 PM
Track buffalo and tuskless elephant on foot, the real way! Also lion, crocodile, hippo, leopard, sable, kudu and eland.
We don't brag any unrealistic trophy sizes but my team and I do guarantee our best effort in helping you achieve your dream in the time allocated,
That is a lot of different animals if they are all on a 'cull' list.
on โ05-03-2015 07:32 PM
@am*3 wrote:
@vicr3000 wrote:
Am3
Wrong, again.
I know lots of people who go to Africa on Safari and shoot and some are cull animals,
Including elephant.
All eat is used.You don't know ALL the people from all over the world, who go to Africa, trophy hunting. Therefore you can't give an accurate assessment.
doncha know he is the suppository of all knowledge???
on โ05-03-2015 07:33 PM
Sports hunters was my group, to be hunted for sport, so by sports hunters. Wouldn't matter who hunted in that scenario.
on โ05-03-2015 07:34 PM
on โ05-03-2015 07:39 PM
Again, you are missing the point.
hunting for a practical purpose, is not a sport.
Hunting an individual would be for sport!
on โ05-03-2015 07:43 PM
@poddster wrote:What group would you start with?
Vic, look to the question posed. That is what I am answering. My group, if there is to be one, are those who themselves hunt for no practical reason.
on โ05-03-2015 08:01 PM
Has anyone thought that there may be occasions when a cull of any type could mean the survival of the species, including humanity?