on 26-07-2013 04:25 PM
CEC Media release 25/7/2013
For a live example of the new “bail-in” policy that Australia’s banking authorities are preparing to legislate here, look at America’s once-great industrial city of Detroit, which declared bankruptcy on 18 July.
“Bail-in” essentially is the policy of stealing from the people to prop up banks, and the model is being applied to Detroit with a vengeance.
By declaring bankruptcy, the financial manager appointed to run the city’s finances is able to renege on the city’s obligations to its retired police, firemen and other workers who for their entire working lives paid into city pension funds.
The financial manager, Kevyn Orr, had earlier failed to convince the pension funds to accept major cuts; now, in bankruptcy, he is offering them pennies on the dollar.
But just two days before declaring bankruptcy, Orr struck a deal with the huge Wall Street and City of London banks whose derivatives gambling bets with the city had caused its bankruptcy, such as Bank of America, AIG and UBS, to pay out 75-80 cents on the dollar on the interest rate swap derivatives the banks had sold to the city!
Those swaps had been rigged against the city by City of London banks which were caught out last year manipulating the benchmark LIBOR—London Inter-Bank Offered Rate—interest rate.
The President of Detroit’s Board of Education, LaMar Lemmons, said of Kevyn Orr in a 21 July interview with LaRouchePAC, “He is in effect a dictator. In the city of Detroit, we have a fascist state… The bankers are being taken care of, the wealthy, the lawyers … have attorneys that are billing the city $1,000 an hour. They’re making millions of dollars off the misery of the City of Detroit, and they are being paid, while they threaten the pensioners.”
Between its peak in the 1950s and 2010, Detroit’s population collapsed by more than one million people, from 1.8 million to 700,000, and the decline has continued since.
Lemmons reports that the number of students in Detroit’s public schools has fallen from 200,000 to 50,000 in the last four years, and 200 schools have been closed, decimating neighbourhoods. In the remaining schools, 40-60 kids are crammed into classrooms. Real unemployment in Detroit is 50%; the crime rate is sky-high, because the underfunded police department can’t respond to emergency calls; the street lights are out in much of the city; and there are more abandoned buildings and properties in Detroit than in any other city in the world. “The misery index for the city probably eclipses most places in the United States, and in some cases, on the planet Earth,” Lemmons said.
Now, with its pensioners being gutted, and other cuts that will be imposed under bankruptcy, Detroit is about to get even worse, all in keeping with the new bail-in model enshrined in law in the US.Dodd-Frank Act 2010, already applied in Cyprus, and also being prepared for Australia.
Citizens Electoral Council leader Craig Isherwood declared today, “Detroit is a crime against humanity, unfolding in front of our eyes. Under the bail-in policy, it is the new standard for what will be imposed worldwide, including in Australia.
“The fight against bail-in is much bigger than just a fight to save our bank accounts; it is a fight to save our lives—a fight for the principle that the economy serves people, not elite financial interests."
I think now would be a good time to make sure your debts and mortgages are settled.
on 28-07-2013 11:58 AM
I could be wrong but I had the impression it was always 30%? Because of joining past 30 we have an age penalty which is approximately 30% so with the rebate it sort of cancelled that out.
I will agree it is expensive and I have noticed we are getting less back the more we pay - my daughter's glasses had dropped from $300 annually to $220 last year.
on 28-07-2013 12:27 PM
@icyfroth wrote:Sorry I didn't get back earlier:
"The cost of maintaining your health needs is expensive. To help ease this cost, the Federal Government Rebate offers you a saving on the cost of your private health cover. You just have to be an Australian resident who is eligible for Medicare and have private health cover.
There are different levels of rebate, depending on the age of the oldest person on your policy."
Age of the oldest person on your policy Federal Government Rebate 64 years or younger 30% 65 to 69 35% 70 or older 40%
before July 1 the rebate for 64 years or younger was 48% it has now been reduced to 30% (for yearly income under $88k)
Mine has always been 30%. However there were changes on 1st July - I dont know what they are and niether could me health fund give me the specifics. I did get a letter from them saying that there were changes, they were implemented by the government without warning , it will be 'adjusted' when I put my tax in for this year (12 months away) and that was the advice the government gave the health fund.
I was almost going to post on here and ask if anyone knew what the details were. I still dont know.
on 28-07-2013 12:32 PM
We had the same letter but I dismissed it as we have always had our rebate as we go rather than at tax time. Now I wonder if I should have looked further into it?
on 28-07-2013 12:37 PM
Just looking at the site,I don't think ours will change.
http://http://www.privatehealth.gov.au/healthinsurance/incentivessurcharges/insurancerebate.htm
Australian Government Private Health Insurance Rebate
Most Australians with private health insurance currently receive a rebate from the Australian Government to help cover the cost of their premiums. The private health insurance rebate is income tested. The table below details the different rebate amounts and Medicare Levy Surcharge levels.
The rebate applies to hospital, general treatment and ambulance policies. It does not apply to overseas visitors cover The rebate levels applicable for 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 are:
SinglesFamilies ≤$88,000≤$176,000 $88,001-102,000$176,001-204,000 $102,001-136,000$204,001-272,000 ≥$136,001≥$272,001
< age 65 | 30% | 20% | 10% | 0% |
Age 65-69 | 35% | 25% | 15% | 0% |
Age 70+ | 40% | 30% | 20% | 0% |
All ages | 0.0% | 1.0% | 1.25% | 1.5% |
Single parents and couples (including de facto couples) are subject to family tiers. For families with children, the thresholds are increased by $1,500 for each child after the first.
on 28-07-2013 01:10 PM
E-M I tend to do the same, skim read, dismiss, then later I think what was that again?
I have the letter at work, will double-check tomorrow.
on 28-07-2013 02:16 PM
IF: "before July 1 the rebate for 64 years or younger was 48% it has now been reduced to 30% (for yearly income under $88k)"
IF I can find no reference to support that comment, so please could you direct/show a link for myself as there are a lot to be found..
I have found tables below, for years 2012 and 2013 health rebates, with no reference to a 2012 rate of 48% , just a small increase in applicable income levels from 2012 to 2013 FYs.
nɥºɾ
2012
2013
on 28-07-2013 02:20 PM
see my reply to e-m post 25
on 28-07-2013 02:34 PM
I understand IF, but do wonder (and I have said it often here) why do Posterers make definitive statements that can be checked? . At the least, add a get out of jail qualification.
nɥºɾ
on 28-07-2013 02:39 PM
on 28-07-2013 05:56 PM
we live in an age of information overload