on 20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
on 14-05-2015 05:08 PM
Well this is going to be interesting. Seems Cormann and Frydenberg, have accessed both parental leave schemes. And yet Frdenberg said on Lateline that this was double dipping and an entitlement that had to be stopped! And they wonder why we don't trust them.
on 14-05-2015 05:30 PM
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-14/budget-2-15-josh-frydenberg-ppl-wife-double-dipped/6469578
Budget 2015: Assistant Treasurer Josh Frydenberg admits wife 'double dipped' on paid parental leave
Assistant Treasurer Josh Frydenberg has revealed his wife claimed paid parental leave payments from her employer and the Government, as Labor steps up its attacks on the Coalition's plan to stop women benefiting from two schemes.
"We accessed both schemes as my wife was entitled to and there are many people I'm sure on both sides of the House who have done that," Mr Frydenberg told Sky News.
Earlier today Senator Cormann described the Coalition's push to stop women getting two payments as a "fairness measure" and defended the Government calling it "double dipping".
But this afternoon, under questioning from Labor senator Sam Dastyari, Senator Cormann did not deny his wife Hayley, a Perth lawyer, received benefits from her employer, Clayton Utz, and the Government PPL scheme.
"Let me confirm for him that I have indeed had a little child in 2013 and that our family of course worked within a system that was available at the time like any other family and that my family will work within whatever system is in place in the future," Senator Cormann said.
oh dear, here come those double standards again!
on 14-05-2015 05:34 PM
Coalition ministers admit their families benefited from two parental leave schemes
Finance Minister Mathias Cormann and Assistant Treasurer Josh Frydenberg have conceded their families benefited from the current paid parental leave system where parents can claim benefits from both their employer and the government.
The government has been under fire for saying receiving two sets of entitlements is "double-dipping" and "a rort" as it moves to prevent families from accessing two schemes.
on 14-05-2015 05:39 PM
The $1.8m cost of entertaining foreign dignitaries in Australia
The total cost of food, entertainment, hotels, flights, flowers, translators and flags for 13 visits by various foreign leaders and ministers between mid-2014 and February 2015 came in at $1.75 million. The costs were revealed in Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet documents released by the Senate on May 12 - the same day the media was busy poring over the Abbott government's second budget.
more 'belt tightening"
on 14-05-2015 05:51 PM
Assistant Treasurer Josh Frydenberg has revealed his wife claimed paid parental leave payments from her employer and the Government,
Fraudsters! (at least according to Joe Hockey and perhaps Morrison as well).
on 14-05-2015 05:51 PM
momman wrote:
"I did indeed read the article T2844. As with any paper, the conclusion always sums up what has preceded and addresses the initial proposition/introduction which in this case was:"
Very good monman. But you seem to have a habit of only posting what part suits your arguement. Why not include the part that stares :
However, Mr Hockey's memorandum does not repeat the following paragraph in Mr Swan's memorandum under the heading 'Context of amendments': "Part of the savings from this measure will be used to fund other Government priorities, including reforms announced in the Government's Industry and Innovation Statement, 'A Plan for Australian Jobs'.
I know you follow the Party line of cutting and pasting anything that suits your political bias, but sometimes even that shows just how biased your postings are. If you did you read it completely, you would realise that your party's and Swan's
legislation may be similiar but your party simply makes the cuts with no details how the savings will be used
on 14-05-2015 05:59 PM
I just heard this whopper from Joe Hockey on ABC radio (recorded earlier today):
Bill Shorten wants to introduce a new tax for people with $75,000 in superannuation
Come on Joe, you know this is a porky. If called out on it, I'll bet you claim it was a slip of the tongue.
Labor is looking at taxing people who earn over $75,000 p.a. from their super. Let's say a fund returns 5% (not bad in todays market). To achieve $75K p.a. you'd need a balance of $1.5 million, or $1,425,000 more than the amount claimed by Sloppy Joe.
on 14-05-2015 06:06 PM
@crosbystills wrote:I just heard this whopper from Joe Hockey on ABC radio (recorded earlier today):
Bill Shorten wants to introduce a new tax for people with $75,000 in superannuation
Come on Joe, you know this is a porky. If called out on it, I'll bet you claim it was a slip of the tongue.
Labor is looking at taxing people who earn over $75,000 p.a. from their super. Let's say a fund returns 5% (not bad in todays market). To achieve $75K p.a. you'd need a balance of $1.5 million, or $1,425,000 more than the amount claimed by Sloppy Joe.
He did the same yesterday. It is a diliberate ploy to get people outraged into thinking that they will be taxed more highly, double dipped, if they have $75,000 in their super. He is definitely avoiding the use of income from super.
on 14-05-2015 06:09 PM
Nikki Savva - Tony Abbott could not bring himself to sack Joe Hockey, so he killed him with 1000 cuts
Having a go or having a lend? Voters, you decide
The past few days have provided further proof, as if any were needed, of how brutal and how crude politics can be. Tony Abbott could not bring himself to sack his Treasurer, Joe Hockey, so he killed him with a thousand cuts. Small ones, barely noticeable, to produce a deficit of a piffling $35.1 billion next financial year, forecast to shrink to a piddling $7bn in three years.
The strategy, which has guaranteed Hockey will never produce a surplus, which did everything possible to minimise his role in the preparation as well as the selling of the 2015 budget, framed by a government quaking in its RM Williams, has succeeded in emasculating the Treasurer.
The crisis in debt and deficit, which the Coalition argued only it could fix in government, has been suffocated, along with the Treasurer, by the greater internal weight of the leadership crisis, which threatened, and could still terminate, Abbott. The triumph of politics over economics will be counted as a success, if only in the short term, but the short term is what matters most to Abbott now.
Abbott should know voters have long memories. They neither like being mugged nor being treated like mugs. They know the difference in approach from last year to this had more to do with his fate than theirs, his fragility rather than theirs, more to do with saving his own backside rather than any burning desire to pad theirs. The people he and Hockey are urging to have a go know full well when politicians are having a lend.
Hockey was not allowed to be the supersalesman front of house or the clever architect behind the scenes. It raised the question of whether there was any point in having a Treasurer in name only, except to do exactly as he is told. Treasurers, despite prime ministerial omnipotence, are trusted to do their job or they are not. Sadly for Hockey, and despite him thanking the Prime Minister at Tuesday’s joint party meeting for his leadership, the strategy put together for the second budget clearly showed Abbott does not.
Abbott’s repeated verbal assurances to Hockey that his job is safe are not worth the paper they are written on, as old-time movie mogul Samuel Goldwyn used to advise his stars. If this budget does become the launch pad for an early election — and Abbott did nothing to dispel speculation about it yesterday — it would be a massive misreading of the mood of the electorate. Inevitably he would also be asked if Hockey would remain as Treasurer in the next term. And the answer is …?
....Working in the government’s favour is the fact most of the deal-making will be in the hands of one of its best operators, the de facto treasurer, Scott Morrison.
...It must show instant results. The $5.5bn small-business package has to produce early evidence of a pick-up in investment and jobs. The budget forecasts show unemployment will stay high and growth remain anaemic.
Even so those forecasts are regarded as optimistic, showing the government believes the glass is not only half full, it positively overflows.
Read more:
14-05-2015 06:17 PM - edited 14-05-2015 06:18 PM
Cros, it could be something like that. have a look at this article from April
Rich to lose tax breaks on super-sized super under future Labor government
A recent assessment by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia put the number of superannuation millionaires with $10 million-plus account balances at 475. ASFA also concluded there were another 24,000 people with $2 million-plus accounts - both groups earning hundreds of thousands and even millions in tax-free income from their superannuation.
In all it has been estimated that some 60,000 superannuation accounts have balances exceeding $1.5 million at present.
Part-pensioners would not be affected because the income cut-off for pension eligibility is well below the $75,000 income mark - and it is understood capital gains are to be grandfathered.