Diary of our stinking Govt.

As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed.  The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.Woman Happy

 

This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.

 

and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598

 

Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says

 

The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.

 

Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).

But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.

 

"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.

 

Message 1 of 17,615
Latest reply
17,614 REPLIES 17,614

Diary of our stinking Govt.

God you're funny Deb,

 

In postt 24,982 you findd it disgusting the way photows are 'shopped.

 

yet here you are...

 

Message 14141 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

no it's different, I'm not placing anyone amongst terrorists like they have and do- I hope they haven't made her a target

 

oh and my pic wasn't published in a newspaper either

 

 

funnier that you can't see that imo  Cat LOL

Message 14142 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

"So in your opinion that makes it OK to photo shop someone's clothing, surroundings and people they are with-............."

 

Obviously,  judging by the Tag-Team support.    Even J2010 is persuaded by the Abbott copies ! a1thatcher.jpg

 

 I somehow doubt if those producing the image  actually realise the idiom "we speak with one voice" is a compliment  indicating a uniformity of purpose.

 

"So in your opinion that makes it OK to photo shop...."   From page two of this cathartic thread over a year ago a1thatcher.jpg

 

 

 

Talking about  uniformity of purpose. and photoshopping,   let's not forget the halcyon days of the "Circus"  and their well used idiom:

"What goes around, comes around"

cartoon final small.jpg

 

John siggy.GIF

 

Message 14143 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.


@debra9275 wrote:

no it's different, I'm not placing anyone amongst terrorists like they have and do- I hope they haven't made her a target

 

 

funnier that you can't see that imo  Cat LOL


 

Message 14144 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

forget the old circus, we have a bigger one going on right now  Woman LOL

Message 14145 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

Anonymous
Not applicable

what was your reaction when

polksalad posted this photo, debra?  

 

 

 

Fiona Scott 1

Message 14146 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

Monman, so you think it is ok for a newspaper to show a photoshopped photo of Plibersek dressed in a hijab and posing with a couple of terrorists and supporting terror?

 

Trawling through old posts must make it all seem ok to you?

Joono
Message 14147 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

I think I said I knew it was photshopped- but again that is not  putting a woman alongside terrorists is it??

Message 14148 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

I don't think it's OK  Joono and as for that old photo shopped Margeret Thatcher image, I very much doubt that it was me who posted that- yet I get the meaning of it Tony- thatcherism  - again it's not putting someone alongside a terrorist unless you think thatcher was a terrorist of course

Message 14149 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

Anonymous
Not applicable

debra9275 wrote:

I think I said I knew it was photshopped- but again that is not  putting a woman alongside terrorists is it??


debra9275 wrote:

So in your opinion that makes it OK to photo shop someone's clothing, surroundings and people they are with- I'll  keep that in mind next time they do it to someone

 

 

you either think its ok or it isn't, debra.

 

can't have it both ways.

 

 

Message 14150 of 17,615
Latest reply