Diary of our stinking Govt.

As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed.  The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.Woman Happy

 

This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.

 

and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598

 

Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says

 

The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.

 

Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).

But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.

 

"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.

 

Message 1 of 17,615
Latest reply
17,614 REPLIES 17,614

Diary of our stinking Govt.

 

No, I think two things happened

 

 

Abbott was told to lessen her incfuence AND, as a result of that, he realised that she had to stay out of sight.

 

Tactical move which probably helped.

 

Now, as to whether he does curtail her influence, or perceived influence, we shall see.

 

Even if it is only a change in perception.

 

I gather she was a very good gate keeper, too good ???????

 

 

 

 

 

Message 8941 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

because murdoch ordered him to get rid of her??

 

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-09/tony-abbott-keeps-liberal-leadership-failed-spill-motion/60790...

 

Tony Abbott keeps leadership of Liberal Party but some supporters fear he is doomed

Message 8942 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.


@vicr3000 wrote:

 

No, I think two things happened

 

 

Abbott was told to lessen her incfuence AND, as a result of that, he realised that she had to stay out of sight.

 

Tactical move which probably helped.

 

Now, as to whether he does curtail her influence, or perceived influence, we shall see.

 

Even if it is only a change in perception.

 

I gather she was a very good gate keeper, too good ???????

 

 

 

 

 


I don't agree with your thoughts.

 

Nothing to do with being a good gate keeper, quite the opposite actually.

 

You think a change in perception would allay the reasons why backbenchers/MP's ( & Rupert!)  want her gone?, you must be kidding.

 

Message 8943 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.


@vicr3000 wrote:

 

am3

 

Sore loser who got it wrong, Big time.

 

Even you said he needed to win well and he did win well, FAR more than you expected.

 

The LEFT are the Canibals who eat their own and then still lose.

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Incorrect, I never did say that. If you want to make false statements, the least you could do is quote the posts you refer to so everyone can see if your 'opinion'/accusations are accurate.

 

Here are some posts that come to mind, where another poster & I were discussing the fact that the spill might not happen and the possible outcome if that happened.

 

1.

@am*3 wrote:

We are not speaking of Julia though are we!!    ABBOTT is the PM right now...... there is no way any past political party is responsible for where he is right now.... he brought it all upon himself...

 

 poddster wrote:What damage has been done if the spill motion does not go ahead?

 

am*3 wrote: Read a variety of news articles from different msm media outlets... its all spelt out in those .. whether a left bias or right bias ones.

 How could it spell solidarity if 20, 30, 40 vote to have Abbott removed?

 

 

2.

@poddster wrote:

By the way 40 out of 102 does not a majority make

am*3

I know that, it was an example of potential disgruntled members... <40 - 51 votes against him.. not a majority but doesn't  = loyalty, continuity either.

 

Abbott's situation is not a result of any past Govt... he is solely responsible for where he finds himself at present. 

 

Message 8944 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

idle  - have you not done exactly the same thing yourself?Woman Frustrated

 

 

Tony Abbott's removal as prime minister not a case of if but when

 

Tony Abbott's leadership has suffered a massive blow - inevitably one that will prove fatal to his leadership.

 

It is no longer a case of if but when.

 

A sizeable 39 per cent of his parliamentary team has declared it has no confidence in its leader, the country's Prime Minister.

 

The message to voters who were already walking away in droves is "you're right to go, he's not up to it". 

 

 

But there's an even more damaging number to consider if you're Abbott. Assuming his 41-strong ministry and party whips held together and voted in favour of the leadership (as Abbott and his backers demanded they must by convention), then near enough to 60 per cent of his backbench has abandoned him.

 

And from that devastating reality, one can conclude that if ministers had been granted a genuinely free vote, Abbott would have already lost.

 

His confidence in the party room is shot to pieces.

 

This now, is a prime minister who leads in name only and governs with a sword of Damocles hanging over his head.

 

If he survives for any length of time, his fate will be determined by opinion polls to which he will be hostage. This is no way to formulate policy, and a natural enemy of reform.

 

Read more

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/tony-abbotts-removal-as-prime-minister-not-a-c...

 

 

How short sighted to crow so early, over the fact that only 39% of votes didn't back Abbott as Leader.

 

Message 8945 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.


@debra9275 wrote:

I wonder what's happened to Peta Credlin?,  am so used to seeing her by TA's side, have not sighted her since before his National Press Club announcements  Woman Surprised


Another sticking point.

 

Tony Abbott won’t sacrifice Peta Credlin, Joe Hockey

 

9 Feb

 

KEY members of Tony Abbott’s team will stay in place despite pressure for dramatic change at the top of the federal government and rumours he will dump Joe Hockey and Peta Credlin to save his leadership.

 

Ms Credlin is being savaged by MPs who want her to step down so the government can set a new course, making her a lightning rod for criticism of Mr Abbott’s governing style and policy decis­ions.

 

Liberal MPs have said privately that one way for Mr Abbott to end doubts about his future was to overhaul his office and replace Ms Credlin, seen as the architect of a “command and control” approach to running the government.

 

The Australian

 

Message 8946 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

"I wonder what's happened to Peta Credlin?,  am so used to seeing her by TA's side, have not sighted her since before his National Press Club announcements"

 

I would guess that perhaps they are trying to avoid a tawdry innuendo similar to this:

 

"Yes, she's had that twinkle in her eye all week. At first I thought it was because she was enjoying the attention/cat and mouse game with the press, not so sure now, perhaps there is more to it. Apparently she and Turnbull are very close friends."

 

Myopic Tongues2 Small.jpg

 

Message 8947 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

Your opinion only, mm. No one else here thought the same as you did about the post. There was no reason to think that post had any 'tawdry innuendo' in it.

 

Turnbull & Bishop are close friends. 

 

If you read several posts back before that one, you will see other posters (myself included) mentioned a twinkle in Julie B's eye... all related to leadership challenges.. maybe she was looking forward to having a new leader, maybe not? We did notice there was a sparkle in her eyes when she spoke about Leadership challenges... 

No one poster has given the impression with the eye talk that it related to anything other than political matters.

 

With Peta C, she may have been directed to lay low until after the meeting this morning... we will have to wait and see about that.

 

Message 8948 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.

 Murdoch said Peta Credlin had to go

 

and it's common knowledge that Bishop and Turnbull have been close friends for many years. i suggest you do some research on it. the only innuendo about their friendship is all in your mind

  Woman Frustrated

 

 

Message 8949 of 17,615
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking Govt.


@monman12 wrote:

"I wonder what's happened to Peta Credlin?,  am so used to seeing her by TA's side, have not sighted her since before his National Press Club announcements"

 

I would guess that perhaps they are trying to avoid a tawdry innuendo similar to this:

 

"Yes, she's had that twinkle in her eye all week. At first I thought it was because she was enjoying the attention/cat and mouse game with the press, not so sure now, perhaps there is more to it. Apparently she and Turnbull are very close friends."

 

Myopic Tongues2 Small.jpg

 


It's not tawdry. It was leadership speculation and the possibility of ridding themselves of a PM who can't win in the polls compared to one who is popular with the electorate.  The PM is an embarrassment for them both.  It's no wonder she had a twinkle in her eyes.  The PM has treated her poorly.

Message 8950 of 17,615
Latest reply