on 19-09-2014 02:39 PM
Last week in the Philadephia, (the city of brotherly love) approximately 12 individuals severely beat two gay individuals who were minding their own business. They were hurt so badly, that when the police arrived, they thought there had been a shooting because there was so much blood. They were walking down the street, minding their own business when one of them was asked if the other was his boyfriend. He answered yes, and then the pummeling began.
After video showing the perpetrators was released by the police department in hopes of helping identify them, it was only a matter of time before they were identified. It turns out, that one of the men who participated in the beating, was an assistant coach in a Catholic high school and several of the others, were former students of this high school. I guess this doesn't speak too highly of their Christian upbringing, that they would think it's okay to beat the carp out of a couple of gay men.
It appears that our federal government has been asked to prosecute these individuals based on federal hate crime laws that were inacted in the aftermath of the beating and murder of Matthew Shepard several years ago. Although there are hate-crime laws in Philadelphia, gay individuals are not included in the criteria for hate crimes.
Do you think there should be hate-crime laws or should people only be charged with regular crimes when they break the law, for no other reason than their hatred of certain groups of people?
on 19-09-2014 03:33 PM
on 19-09-2014 03:34 PM
on 19-09-2014 05:44 PM
Yes, it should be a hate crime but I also think that they should be charged with attempted murder, not just assault.
on 19-09-2014 06:31 PM
My daughter is 28 - she played soccer Premier League from the age of 15, where apparantly all 'female' players are GAY - LOL, but she never got dealt with the stigma, not the way a gay male would, and I find that amazing, not to mentiuon sexist, if you can say that when you are talking about gay people..
She is in the DF now, an officer in the Army MP's and couldn't be happier, so feel my job is done.
But I do wonder, how would it have been if it were my son who was gay ? Would his life have been as happy ?
19-09-2014 06:47 PM - edited 19-09-2014 06:47 PM
My pride and joy - aged 20
on 19-09-2014 09:38 PM
My daughter will be 48 soon and things were very different back then.
Even for family. Her sister used to cop snide remarks. 'So if your sister is a lesbian does that mean you are too', and worse.
I was asked where I went wrong raising her.
By the way nice looking girl.
I think there is a reasonable acceptance in my town now of male and female. I never hear any adverse remartks.
on 20-09-2014 12:44 AM
worse.
I was asked where I went wrong raising her.
There was one man on the U.S. board, who didn't ask me where I went wrong. He flat out told me it was my fault that I had a gay son. I think that's the only time in all the years I've been posting on the boards, that I was truly hurt by a comment. But then I realized that it said a lot more about him, than it did about me. My son is a very happy and well adjusted young man. I couldn't be more proud of him. I know a lot of people who have straight children that have given them problems for years. I never had that with my son or my daughter, so my husband and I must have done something right.
I will never, for the life of me, understand why some people just want to be cruel and hurt others. Yes, we can all have disagreements, but to set out to hurt someone for no reason, absolutely baffles me. And beating a person senseless just because they are gay, is something that I just can't wrap my mind around.
on 20-09-2014 02:54 AM
on 20-09-2014 03:37 AM
my husband went through that too,after his brother came out,and he was married to his first wife then.
my BIL is 59 now,hubby is almost 61.
there are a few family members who still won't speak to either of them,or me,and who wouldn't speak to my inlaws,because nobody tried to "fix" craig.
imho,they are the ones who need fixing.
on 20-09-2014 04:13 AM
Do you think there should be hate-crime laws or should people only be charged with regular crimes when they break the law, for no other reason than their hatred of certain groups of people?
I don't know, on the one hand, how do we know in every case if or not it was done out of some discrimination or it was just the victim that attackers didn't like and it having nothing to do with what they are or how they live? I believe a crime of violence should be viewed the same no matter who it's against.
Speaking as an ongoing victim of violent attacks from police, I can't say for sure in some cases if discrimination played a part. I can only speculate. There was the time in 2011 where discrimination was pretty clear, but it was used as more of a baiting tactic to get a rise from me so they could have better grounds to arrest me and abuse me in jail. But I tend to believe it was me they dislike and was just using that about me. Compared to the problem of cops not being accountable for their misdeads, the hate crime problem is minor.
So a crime should be a crime and nothing more. There is hate involved in any violent attack on anyone, no one person or how they live should make it more or less a crime, and wearing a silly uniform and badge shouldn't give someone a pass.