Does jJournalism Still Require Impartiality?

If you think of the names that have created the biggest buzz in the media world in the past few years – blogger/journalist Glenn Greenwald, data guru Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight, Julian Assange of Wikileaks, and now the increasingly popular lo-fi documentary makers at Vice News – they have one thing in common.

 

These are story-tellers for a digital age that come less from the tradition of straight, impartial news gathering and instead embrace a new style of journalism which favours transparency, strong analysis, opinion, a subjective standpoint, and at times, flat-out advocacy for one side of a debate.

 

But journalists must still tread with caution here. Transparency alone is not a get-out-of-jail-free card.

 

Tom Kent of Associated Press has wisely warned against discarding impartiality as “easy roadkill in the rush to new journalism techniques”. Transparency must still be coupled with the hallmarks of solid journalism: checking facts, attributing accurately, uncovering new information, and exposing falsehoods.

 

Entire Article Here

 

 I enjoy reading an opinion piece but I prefer my news unbiased.

Message 1 of 31
Latest reply
30 REPLIES 30

Does jJournalism Still Require Impartiality?

Disclaimer: not in reply to anyone in particular.

 

Our one and only "National" daily here is The West Australian, and its editors have a very curious agenda. They seem to think the best way to sell papers is to be "anti" whichever party happens in power. As a result they are currently anti LNP at  both State and Federal levels. However, when we had a Labor Government in Canberra they were anti that and when we had a Labor State Government they were anti that also

. It makes for some rather interesting editorial contortions when the State and Federal governments are of different 'colours'

Message 31 of 31
Latest reply