on 02-08-2014 02:34 PM
Could it reach Australia and the West and other countries?
West African nations create a cross-border Ebola isolation zone to stem the deadly outbreak
WEST Africa’s Ebola-hit nations have agreed to impose a cross-border isolation zone at the epicentre of the world’s worst-ever outbreak, amid warnings that the deadly epidemic is spiralling out of control.
The announcement came at an emergency summit in the Guinean capital on Friday to discuss the outbreak, which has killed more than 700 people, with the World Health Organisation warning Ebola could cause “catastrophic” loss of life and severe economic disruption if it continued to spread.
WHAT IS EBOLA? What you need to know about the deadly disease outbreak
“We have agreed to take important and extraordinary actions at the inter-country level to focus on cross-border regions that have more than 70 per cent of the epidemic,” said Hadja Saran Darab, the secretary-general of the Mano River Union bloc grouping the nations.
“These areas will be isolated by police and military. The people in these areas being isolated will be provided with material support,” she said at the meeting in Conakry.
on 02-08-2014 02:37 PM
Out of control! Killer Ebola virus may soon reach Britain, health chief warns
At a crisis meeting of political leaders from affected countries, Dr Margaret Chan, director-general of the World Health Organisation, said the deadly disease is outrunning efforts to control it.
She said the meeting in Guinea’s capital Conakry “must be a turning point” in the fight against the virus.
She added: “This outbreak is moving faster than our efforts to control it.
“If the situation continues to deteriorate, the consequences can be catastrophic in terms of lost lives, severe socio-economic disruption and a high risk of spread to other countries.”
At least 729 people in Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Nigeria have died since cases emerged in March.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/494649/Killer-Ebola-virus-spread-reach-Britain
02-08-2014 03:41 PM - edited 02-08-2014 03:45 PM
Well, Ebola is for the first time on American soil, as it was decided to fly two patients for treatment there. not what I would have done...
and a Commonwealth Games athlete from Sierra Leone has done a runner as he doesn't want to go home, fellow athletes were quarantined.
on 02-08-2014 03:47 PM
the link for the American story. Accidentally posted the Games one twice oops
on 02-08-2014 05:24 PM
I can't help thinking we should be stopping incoming travellers from African countries. Or at least a quarantine before they continue into Australia. This is not a virus to be mucked about with.
on 02-08-2014 10:04 PM
on 03-08-2014 01:26 AM
If you think that the CDC in the United States hasn't had samples of Ebola and its first cousin, Marburg in its possession for decades, you're incredibly naive........
on 03-08-2014 05:44 AM
Yes Ebola is a particularly nasty virus. And yes, most who contract it die a very nasty death.
However, like Aids, Ebola can only be transmitted from person to person via an exchange of bodily fluids. But, and this is the big but, unlike Aids, Ebola has a very short incubation period, and as such the chances of contacting the virus vide normal social contact (including sexual contact) is remote in the extreme.
So what does that mean? In third world countries it is a problem because of a lack of front line, properly equipped medal staff to treat the patient. That is, due to a lack of medical services they are more often than not treated by family members, who don’t have any protective clothing and equipment to safely handle the patient, and as such, come into contact with contaminated bodily fluids (vomit, excrement). Here however when someone is suspected of being infected, they, and anyone who has come into contact with them are immediately isolated, with all medical staff being properly equipped with Hazmat suits.
The point, viruses such as Ebola only pose a credible risk in countries with first world medical services, if and when it becomes aerosol. But the virus has been around for centuries (if not longer) and that hasn’t happened yet, and in fact, is never likely to, unless someone gives it a push in the right direction - genetically engineered – but that is another topic entirely.
on 03-08-2014 09:42 AM
I must admit to reading through this to see if the poster blamed the previous Labor Government for this outbreak, or some of the Labor supporters on here.
Perhaps if it does reach Australian shores (heaven forbid, I hope not), he will then put the blame on Rudd or Gillard for something they did or didn't do in the past.
On a more serious note, I truly hope they can contain the outbreak to its source and that those sent to the USA make a recovery without anyone else being infected over there.
Very scary bug that one.
Reminds me of the movie Outbreak with Dustin Hoffman.
on 03-08-2014 09:57 AM
@this-one-time-at-bandcamp wrote:If you think that the CDC in the United States hasn't had samples of Ebola and its first cousin, Marburg in its possession for decades, you're incredibly naive........
There are labs in Australia working with Ebola, and other such pathogens, trying to find vaccine and/or effective drug.