If you're talking to me. Don't tell me what I mean.
If you read and comprehend you would understand what I said.
Me not caring how/saying it is not my job to fund it is not saying the policy should not be analysed. The NDIS has been analysed by people better qualified than me from the reviews to the implementation stage. I do not need to study the financial details in full as I trust the judgement of those who have and are working on the financials.. Some things just have to have the money found for them and NDIS is one.
|
I don't have a problem with the NDIS or how it is funded. It's the manner in which it has been "sold" to us that I object to, and the empty promises and false sense of security that encompass it.
I wholeheartedly agree that our health system needs a major injection of funds - but why the need for the spin and the emotive sales pitch?
Why not just say we need more money and we are going to get it by increasing your taxes?
I don't know how to say this without you getting your back up, so I'll just hope for the best, but whilst things like the NBN are probably really great and so forth, if we can't afford basic care of our community, then why introduce new things to pay for?
Ya know, if you or I can't afford something that we want, we either go without, or wait to get it when we can afford it. We don't go around just redirecting our money to the things we want and not put any into the things we need.
Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
