on 13-04-2020 10:27 AM
Let's have a survival story for a change:
Ten days ago, Kathleen Watson thought she'd spoken to her husband Ken for the final time.
The 70-year-old grandfather had lost consciousness and was struggling to breathe – placed in a coma as coronavirus ravaged his body.
He had been without medical care for 12 hours while quarantined in a Perth hotel.
"But today he's got his strong voice back and it was absolutely – it's a miracle," Mrs Watson told 9News.
He will have to return multiple negative test results before he's released into self-isolation with Mrs Watson, who has formed antibodies against the killer virus.
on 13-04-2020 10:30 AM
That is interesting that she has formed antibodies without actually having had it! Good news.
on 13-04-2020 10:33 AM
@springyzone wrote:That is interesting that she has formed antibodies without actually having had it! Good news.
Yes. It has all sorts of implications...
on 13-04-2020 11:54 AM
@icyfroth wrote:
@springyzone wrote:That is interesting that she has formed antibodies without actually having had it! Good news.
Yes. It has all sorts of implications...
Where does it state she has formed antibodies without actually having had it? It only states she "has formed antibodies against the killer virus".
on 13-04-2020 01:42 PM
@not_for_sale2024 wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@springyzone wrote:That is interesting that she has formed antibodies without actually having had it! Good news.
Yes. It has all sorts of implications...
Where does it state she has formed antibodies without actually having had it?
It only states she "has formed antibodies against the killer virus".
She's formed antibodies after having been in contact with the virus, whilst nursing her sick husband, and not falling ill with it herself!
Sheesh!
on 13-04-2020 01:50 PM
@icyfroth wrote:
@not_for_sale2024 wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@springyzone wrote:That is interesting that she has formed antibodies without actually having had it! Good news.
Yes. It has all sorts of implications...
Where does it state she has formed antibodies without actually having had it?
It only states she "has formed antibodies against the killer virus".
She's formed antibodies after having been in contact with the virus, whilst nursing her sick husband, and not falling ill with it herself!
Sheesh!
Um, I think that means having had it. Duh...
on 13-04-2020 02:36 PM
@not_for_sale2024 wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@not_for_sale2024 wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@springyzone wrote:That is interesting that she has formed antibodies without actually having had it! Good news.
Yes. It has all sorts of implications...
Where does it state she has formed antibodies without actually having had it?
It only states she "has formed antibodies against the killer virus".
She's formed antibodies after having been in contact with the virus, whilst nursing her sick husband, and not falling ill with it herself!
Sheesh!
Um, I think that means having had it. Duh...
You think?
on 13-04-2020 02:41 PM
Yep.
on 13-04-2020 02:46 PM
@not_for_sale2024 wrote:Yep.
Well...I think, having had exposure to it, and not falling ill with it means you can build immunity to it.
Without falling ill to it yourself.
As has been proven in this case.
13-04-2020 02:49 PM - edited 13-04-2020 02:53 PM
I think he must have already had a good immune system to fight it off
But not everybody has that including the young