Perhaps you might also like to read this.
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/why-does-this-immunologist-reject-vaccinations/
Of course, in a sense she is right. Vaccination is not normal - it flies in the face of evolution (just like antibiotics) Without them nature would take it's course and the strongest - i.e those with the best immune systems - would survive to pass on their genes to their descendants. Let's not forget, The Black Death, (Bubonic Plague) wiped out between a third and a half of the entire population of Europe within the space of a few years, but I'm sure those that survived had pretty awesome immune systems.
Myxomatosis was released in Australia to control the rabbit population.in 1950. It was devastatingly effective, reducing the estimated rabbit population from 600 million to 100 million in two years. However, the rabbits remaining alive were those least affected by the disease. Genetic resistance to myxomatosis was observed soon after the first release and most rabbits acquired partial immunityin the first two decades. Resistance has been increasing slowly since the 1970s, and the disease now only kills about 50% of infected rabbits
So there you go. If we stoped immunising, I'm sure the population would gradually acquire a greater natural immunity. There would , of course, be initial pandemics of diseases like whooping cough, rubella and polio, but maybe in 65 years time, we would be able to show a similar decline to the mortality rates from myxomatosis in rabbits. Obviously, while this decline was happening we would have to sacrifice quite a few of our children but I'm sure their grieving parents would be immensely comforted by the knowledge that they died in a good cause and without all those nasty drugs in their systems.
