on 03-04-2013 05:57 PM
http://www.theadvocate.com.au/story/1405229/disqualification-a-sad-day-for-mural-fest/?cs=87
There are about 4 or 5 stories about this event....
Just curious. it seems like an over the top reaction to me. One that will damage the reputation of the event within the arts community.
COMPETITORS at this year's Mural Fest have expressed their commiserations over the disqualification of artist Christian Griffiths.
Former Mural Fest co-ordinator and 2013 artist Leanne Tamas said Mr Griffiths was a highly skilled and sought-after artist and his presence at the international festival would be missed.
``It's really disappointing for the festival really,'' Ms Tamas said.
``It's sad for a young artist [like Mr Griffiths]. He promoted it [Mural Fest] and it's sad for the event that something like this has happened. [See the gallery here.]
``He will never come back.''
Ms Tamas said the decision made by Mr Griffiths to use his own aerosol can paint for his mural did not affect her and her artist partner John Eathorne.
Mr Griffiths was escorted from Mural Park on Monday by a police officer after claims the disqualified artist and former winner of the competition was causing a disturbance to the other competitors.
Ms Tamas, whose mural is only one station away from Mr Griffiths' former space rejected those claims.
``He didn't really bother us. Everyone works in their own space,'' she said.
Directly next to Mr Griffiths' former space, mural competitor Patricia Kirkcaldy said she was sad to see an empty space in the competition but said it was essential that Mr Griffiths adhered to the terms and conditions of the competition.
Ms Kirkcaldy said she had been a little distressed by the incident and was a lot happier now the issue had been resolved.
``He did cause a bit of a disturbance. It's a lot more relaxed here today,'' she said.
Ms Kirkcaldy said she didn't think the incident had affected the spirit of Mural Fest and was looking forward to the next few days working on her mural.
``Not one other artist has complained about the paint. It's actually better quality [than previous years].''
on 03-04-2013 06:09 PM
cans are probably used in more murals than not, i think it a trifle odd and it does diminish the status of the competition somewhat. rules are not condusive to the quality of the work, they detract if anything.
on 03-04-2013 06:30 PM
yes, the artists have to provide a decent sized sample piece and he has been 4 years prior to this, including winning last year.
Looks like the committee got taken over by non arts type people.
Just makes Tassie look stupid. This artist has been promoting the Sheffield murals for years.
Guess who is going to be upset when he starts writing about his most recent experience.
I just want to call them Wan Kerrs and Wan kees.
on 03-04-2013 06:37 PM
:^O well you guys have Mona, so its not all bad.
on 03-04-2013 07:01 PM
on 03-04-2013 07:07 PM
hmm .. condition of entry, artists must use the paint that is supplied,
would appear that one of the (local) sponsors got their nose out o' joint. B-)
on 03-04-2013 07:11 PM
on 03-04-2013 07:18 PM
his website says he uses a certain paint, so thats probably it.
on 03-04-2013 07:25 PM
Has Mr Griffiths been framed ?
on 03-04-2013 07:48 PM
dude it's sheffield.
the guy's probably upset someone (actually or just through being gossiped about) and this is his payback.
imagine the excitement round the dinner tables this is causing.