on 16-01-2015 05:49 PM
on 18-01-2015 12:59 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:No, I don't think you do. It would require reading back a few pages to understand. It wasn't Am 3
yes it was. it was am*3 who initially
brought it up.
she wanted to know who it was that
repeatedly refers to the ex pm's **bleep**.
in response, idlwhile mentioned greer -
you then claimed greer never said it
It goes right back to # 100. Don't know if your device can go there.
Greer did not say it.
on 18-01-2015 01:02 PM
ALEXANDRA KIRK: Neil James from the Australia Defence Association says criticism of Mr Abbott is unjustified.
NEIL JAMES: The Australian theatre commander and the US province team commander have gone through at length and they've basically said, "Look, it's just one of these things that happens in war."
To which Abbott replies, "Sometimes **bleep** happens."
To which John Cantwell, the then Australian theatre commander said immediately after the Abbott comment, "It certainly does."
Now given that context, I honestly can't see how any Australian soldier or their families would think that Tony Abbott was somehow being insensitive about the death of an Australian digger.
ALEXANDRA KIRK: Tony Abbott phoned Lance Corporal MacKinney's widow Beckie last night to explain and if necessary apologise.
In a brief statement she says she fully accepts he was quoted out of context - that as far as the family is concerned there is no issue and the matter is over.
abc - am
on 18-01-2015 01:07 PM
@polksaladallie wrote:
@*julia*2010 wrote:No, I don't think you do. It would require reading back a few pages to understand. It wasn't Am 3
yes it was. it was am*3 who initially
brought it up.
she wanted to know who it was that
repeatedly refers to the ex pm's **bleep**.
in response, idlwhile mentioned greer -
you then claimed greer never said it
It goes right back to # 100. Don't know if your device can go there.
Greer did not say it.
this is a rubbish thread.
18-01-2015 01:14 PM - edited 18-01-2015 01:15 PM
on 18-01-2015 01:14 PM
@polksaladallie wrote:
@*julia*2010 wrote:No, I don't think you do. It would require reading back a few pages to understand. It wasn't Am 3
yes it was. it was am*3 who initially
brought it up.
she wanted to know who it was that
repeatedly refers to the ex pm's **bleep**.
in response, idlwhile mentioned greer -
you then claimed greer never said it
It goes right back to # 100. Don't know if your device can go there.
Greer did not say it.
no. it goes back further than that
idlewhile was referring to the same thing
am*3 was ie our ex pm's big **bleep**.
greer did say gillard had a big **bleep**.
on 18-01-2015 01:21 PM
18-01-2015 01:22 PM - edited 18-01-2015 01:23 PM
I don't know who wrote this:
yes it was. it was am*3 who initially
brought it up.
**she wanted to know who it was that
repeatedly refers to the ex pm's **bleep**.
** I would like to say that is not correct.
I knew who wrote the comment I refered to. My comment was in reply to other comments made by posters who object to Abbott being called names etc, but don't object to negative comments about ex Labor PM's . I used that comment as an example - the one about Ms G's posterior, which is repeated often. It wasn't necessary for me to name the poster who writes that, as it was a simply a comment on contents of the post, not on who posted it.
on 18-01-2015 01:24 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:
@polksaladallie wrote:
@*julia*2010 wrote:No, I don't think you do. It would require reading back a few pages to understand. It wasn't Am 3
yes it was. it was am*3 who initially
brought it up.
she wanted to know who it was that
repeatedly refers to the ex pm's **bleep**.
in response, idlwhile mentioned greer -
you then claimed greer never said it
It goes right back to # 100. Don't know if your device can go there.
Greer did not say it.
no. it goes back further than that
idlewhile was referring to the same thing
am*3 was ie our ex pm's big **bleep**.
greer did say gillard had a big **bleep**
Wrong again
on 18-01-2015 01:24 PM
IW: "This thread is only here to agitate and stir up people. It's not a debate thread as it's one persons opinion on what they like or dislike, like I don't like ice cream, it would get the same inane argument this one has.
It maybe helps the ones who have pent up disappointment that Ms Gillard was dumped by her own party and Mr Rudd was soundly thrashed, so maybe its a vent thread to help them, like the govt thread, it gives them what they want, like a dummy soother."
IW, exactly. This is what I have been saying since the Circus were booted out of town and their followers developed severe PPTSD. Threads that are cathartic for/from them should be viewed as essential, and supported. Unresearched C&P comments are to be expected, anecdotes and beliefs the norm, and of course large cartoons with attached silly comments are de rigeur.
My thoughts: keep the threads coming, as any temporary sugar coating posts might alleviate the bitter medicine forced upon the unhappy pink Myops post Sept. 7th 2013..
nɥºɾ
on 18-01-2015 01:28 PM
whether it was a rhetorical question
or not, the point was, it was regarding
someone making references to the ex
pm's big **bleep**.