on 18-01-2014 11:04 AM
An interesyting open letter written by a fed up Australian
ILLEGAL BOATS "WHAT HAPPENED TO FAIR PLAY?"
The GREENS and ALP are part of the PROBLEM not the SOLUTION.
The community is fed up with the antics of the ALP and Greens especially “cry me a river” Sarah Hanson Young.
The AUSTRALIAN PEOPLE don't need a minute by minute update of what occurs, WE WANT THE BOATS STOPPED. The only peeple that are demanding minute by minute information are the GREENS and the FAILED ALP supporters who created this problem in the first place
That pathetic woman Sarah Hanson Young from the Greens and the ALP are undertaking every possible means to undermine Australian sovereignty and encourage the influx of illegal boat arrivals dealing directly with criminals trading in human trafficking.
Never have the Greens or ALP spoken out against those opportunistic parasites making a fortune from those seeking ILLEGAL entry to Australia.
Blame every single DEATH at sea on the bloodied hands of Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard, ALP and of course the disgraceful blind as a bat GREENS.
Given the press conference by Scott Morrison this morning there is no doubt “cry me a river” Sarah Hanson Young of the Greens and the ALP will hold a press conference and distort the facts solely to undermine the proven effective efforts of the Abbott Government.
Their actions will only serve to AID the CRIMINALS organising the boats in what has become a lucrative business that makes the drug trade seem trivial.
A few questions for “cry me a river” Sarah Hanson Young, the Greens and the ALP and the bleeding heart left leaning people
1. Have the GREENS and the ALP and Left ever pressed the Indonesian government to mutually respect Australian sovereignty as they demand we respect theirs?
2. Given the Indonesian border represents less than 12% of our own border, how difficult is it for them to be pro active, detect & prevent the illegal departure of illegal boats headed for our borders?
3. “cry me a river” Sarah Hanson Young and the ALP in case you have not noticed these boats are not the size of a “tin dingy”, they are more than double the size of a BUS, how the hell are these boats departing Indonesia so frequently undetected?
4. Why is Indonesia allowing them to depart in full knowledge they are intruding on our sovereignty yet demanding we respect their sovereignty?
5. Will Indonesia allow Australian resources into their country to aid and detect these unseaworthy death traps “boats cramped with human lives” to prevent their departure thus abate the current situation and negate the pathetic one way discussion on Indonesian Sovereignty?
6. If Indonesia is INCAPABLE of detecting and stopping these boats before they depart their ports and shores WHY WOULD THEY REFUSE Australian assistance to achieve that goal?
7. Why is this perverted underhanded situation been supported by the GREENS, The ALP and UNIONS?
ALP and GREENS are you aware that respect is a two way street?
This will come as news to the GREENS and the ALP and LEFT, "Respect is a mutual understanding set on a level playing field where by both parties agree on a mutual undertaking that protects the interests of both entities"
There is no doubt the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA has no intention of respecting Australia, they demand respect yet do not reciprocate with equal mutual respect.
The fact of the matter and core of the problem is “there are Indonesian officials, police, security officers” that are part of this hideous deadly business been supported by “cry me a river” Sarah Hanson Young, The GREENS and the ALP
Put the shoe on the other foot and imagine the outcry from Indonesia if the situation was reversed and illegal's were departing our shores to settle in Indonesia!!!!
We are fed up with the perversion, distortion and outright manipulation from the GREENS and the failed ALP
The undisputed case is Indonesia for one reason or another is unable, incapable or unwilling to stop the departure of these boats and have no valid reason to object to Australian assistance to prevent the departures thereby nullifying the current situation.
Our foreign AID to Indonesia must be conditional on them agreeing to Australian resources to detecting stopping these boats before they hit the high seas.
The current situation is untenable and there is no doubt Australian Aerial surveillance and on the ground intelligence will dramatically if not totally stop these boats.
Those on the boats must all be arrested, interrogated so the traffickers are arrested and the entire business shut down.
Those arrested MUST then be placed in UN refugee camps where they can wait their turn like 99% of all other refugees and not given preferential treatment and allowed to queue jump at the expense of law abiding refugees.
Sadly people like the ALP, GREENS and “cry me a river” Sarah Hanson Young are incapable of a fair and balanced approach where by the agree that all refugees are treated fairly and equally.
These pathetic political parties would rather give preference to those that run the gauntlet, risk their own lives and those of their children and deal with criminals. This is the ALP, UNION, GREEN way of formulating policy.
No matter how you dissect the situation the GREENS and ALP are part of the PROBLEM not the SOLUTION.
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 18-01-2014 01:42 PM
hyperbowl (sic) as per miss Gillard's preferred enunciation.
on 18-01-2014 01:48 PM
@silverfaun wrote:hyperbowl (sic) as per miss Gillard's preferred enunciation.
However you care to pronounce it, it still means the same thing - and when misused in an attempt to prove a point, only weakens the argument.
on 18-01-2014 01:48 PM
@silverfaun wrote:
@kengillard wrote:I also agree...but probably NIMBY
have to agree , but as for broken vulnerable desperate people?? some may be but I doubt it after they have traversed through safe countries, paid 10 to 15 thousand dollars to a criminal & then destroyed all papers so their story can't be checked.
Do you have any idea what the term "safe country" means? It is UNHCR concept meaning it is 'country that is signatory to the refugee convention' = country where they can apply for asylum. Not just any country that is not quite as dangerous as some.
The people who come here from Indonesia travel through other countries but none that they can officially stay.
on 18-01-2014 02:15 PM
well you'd better stop using it then.
on 18-01-2014 02:28 PM
@silverfaun wrote:well you'd better stop using it then.
As a matter of fact, I did misuse hyperbole once, quite recently - I made a comment to the effect that 2013 had been the hottest year ever in Austrlalia, when what I should have said was that it had been the hottest year since record keeping began. It was foolish of me, someone very properly took me to task over it and, later, in another thread, I admitted my mistake. Perhaps you would care to follow my example?
on 18-01-2014 02:39 PM
I have made no such mistake. What is your agenda here? you seem to follow my posts to what end??
on 18-01-2014 02:46 PM
here was I reading it and thinking you just shared a laugh ?
is that not the case Silverfaun ?
18-01-2014 02:51 PM - edited 18-01-2014 02:52 PM
as far as passports go....none of my family have any ...if we had to leave our Country for our own safety ....we quite likely would have to leave without them and quite possibly without our birth certificates too (my adult kid's certs have a habit of going missing )
edit: I forgot that my OH does have a UK passport .
on 18-01-2014 02:54 PM
That can't be right Iza, surely everybody, even those living in abject poverty or in war torn countries, would have a passport just sitting around at the ready, renewed regularly, on the offchance they may need to flee?
on 18-01-2014 02:56 PM
I've counted two in this thread so far.