So, they would steal (sieze) this person's camera unless he agreed to turn a copy of his video to their department. Then they are gonna trust him to do that?
Is it just me, or does anyone else see the condisoning going on here. Their need to flex their position, to have people submit and comply. They obviously lied about why they need the video, They ultimatly didn't even want the video and don't care if or not this guy brings them a copy. They just wanted that agreement from him that he would, that compliance, that recognition of their athority. Goes to a big shot hero complex.
I'm gonna tell you what the police really are. Think about any one kind of criminal. Theif, robber, rapist, kidnapper, pedifile, bully, ect, Imagine they all formed a club, or gang, branched out into divisions like sheriff, local city, state patrol, mapped out theit teritory or juristiction, came up with rules, or laws that they could easally twist the meaning of to justify every horrable thing they might want to do to their victims. Then lastly, sell themselves as being of some benifit to the community.
When in truth, at best they are only responders after the fact. They document incidents, many times with false information, many times creating the incident themselves where there otherwise would be none. The supreeme court has rulled that cops do not have to stop or solve crime even if its taking place right in front of them. Many will stop a real crime commited by one who isn't a cop sending them the message that "if you want to do this, become one of us"
There you have it a basic run down of what police are
.
Fun Factor : Now you have a choice in chat, factor that
