Julia Gillard's insidious legacy is union restoration

The boasting of Labor that they have been successful in getting many hundreds of pieces of legislation through parliament is seen for the deceitful & dysfunctional government they are.


 


I said many months ago that the regulation being put through, sometimes up to 300 new regulations a week is the real tragedy of this failed gov.


 


The article below now reveals just how bad they are, how Gillard has shored up her position at the expense of the country & her own party.


 


 


JULIA Gillard is desperately searching for a legacy to establish her place in history beyond the fact that she is the first woman to hold the prime ministership.


 


As matters stand, she is destined to be remembered as the Labor leader who knifed a popular but flawed leader in Kevin Rudd, lost Labor's majority at the 2010 election and then (if current polls are any indication) led Labor to its worst ever loss at the 2013 election.


 


The deterioration in the nation's finances under Gillard's watch and her failure to balance the budget during a period of record terms of trade will have long-term consequences.


 


Her failure on border protection and asylum-seeker policy will be regarded as the greatest policy failure for many decades, while a defining moment of her legacy will be the broken promise over the carbon tax and linking the carbon price to the EU carbon scheme.


 


One of Gillard's more insidious legacies will be her reversal of over 30 years of labour market reform and turning her back on Labor's previous embrace of a deregulated economy.


Under the Gillard government the union movement has enjoyed resurgence in power and influence way beyond the demands or needs of workplaces across Australia. This has occurred because the Prime Minister needs union support to stay in power.


 


When the Prime Minister addressed the AWU conference in February this year, assuring the audience that she was not the leader of a progressive or moderate or social democratic party but the Labor Party, what she was really saying is she views herself as the leader of the union party.


 


Gillard is allowing Australia to be dragged back to the industrial practices of earlier centuries in terms of the power of the unions, thus ignoring the urgent need for Australia's labour force to be competitive in a global economy.


Unions have been under pressure for decades, as globalisation and changes in society have made their role less relevant. Ironically, the greatest decline in union membership occurred under the Hawke and Keating Labor governments from 1983 to 1996, when union coverage declined from about 50 per cent of the workforce to about 25 per cent.


 


At present only 13 per cent of the private sector workforce has union membership.


 


Former ACTU boss Bob Hawke used a series of accords to limit union wage demands, motivated by the knowledge that a wages breakout would damage the economy and drive up unemployment.


Paul Keating brought in the concept of enterprise bargaining, which further restrained the ability of militant union leaders to make exorbitant demands.


 


In 1996, John Howard's government built on this legacy with the introduction of individual Australian Workplace Agreements, which enabled employers to bypass unions altogether and negotiate directly with employees on a one-to-one basis.


 


The successful union campaign of 2007 that helped propel Kevin Rudd into the Lodge also provided his government with a mandate to reform employment laws, with responsibility for the change being placed in Gillard's hands. AWAs were duly scrapped and workplaces heavily re-regulated, reversing many of the reforms of the Howard, Keating and Hawke governments. Fair Work Australia was created and stacked with former union officials.


 


Union bosses then played a key role in the removal of Rudd, with Paul Howes, the brash young head of the AWU, boasting on television in the middle of the ambush of the role he played in bringing down a first-term prime minister.


Through their factional proxies in the Labor caucus, despite consistently poor opinion polls, union leaders remain firmly behind Gillard and are responsible for blocking the return of Rudd to the Labor leadership.


 


The Prime Minister has repaid that support by backing legislation that unfairly tips the balance of workplace relations in favour of the unions and with fiscally reckless policy announcements, including the use of taxpayer funds to top up salaries of aged-care and childcare workers on the condition that they join a union.


Gillard has denied the link between increased pay and union membership, but the union leaders have let the cat out of the bag with brochures for workers detailing their need to join a union to access pay rises from the federal government.


 


There are serious implications from Gillard's strong support for militant union leaders - especially as militancy often leads to fewer employment opportunities for union members. In the past, mines, factories and other businesses have been bankrupted and closed due to the bloody-minded behaviour of some union bosses.


 


Increased union power can also entrench higher levels of unemployment, as employers are reluctant to take on more staff for fear of disruption to their business.


Unreasonable demands from unions also increase the cost of employing existing staff, thus restricting the ability of business to create further opportunities. This is where some union bosses reveal their apparent lack of interest in those who are unemployed.


 


Some unions can and do work constructively with employers to streamline workplace practices to boost productivity and increase profitability, thus creating an environment for increased employment.


The Prime Minister's track record indicates that she is firmly in the camp of the most militant and disruptive unions, and there is significant danger to the economy if she continues to bow to their demands as payback for supporting her leadership.


 


An end to this government cannot come soon enough for those wanting a modern, flexible workplace environment that focuses equally on the needs of employers and employees.


 


by Ross Fitzgerald

Message 1 of 36
Latest reply
35 REPLIES 35

Julia Gillard's insidious legacy is union restoration

Cut and paste a couple of additional items and Voila !   You have your own newspaper.

Message 2 of 36
Latest reply

Julia Gillard's insidious legacy is union restoration

did you know that Unions have  a right of entry into any workplace and can look through your personal records??? I find that very disturbing.. it is none of their business.. Unions now have way too much power and they are only representing 2% of the working population... 


 


 

Message 3 of 36
Latest reply

Julia Gillard's insidious legacy is union restoration

did you know that Unions have  a right of entry into any workplace and can look through your personal records??? I find that very disturbing.. it is none of their business.. Unions now have way too much power and they are only representing 2% of the working population... 


 


Cat - Fair Work inspectors and unions can be granted access to employee records when a breach in regulation and law occurs.They can't just waltz in and demand to go through records on a whim.


 


How else would they find out if workers are being exploited? I would say it IS their business and it is in the best interest of employees. 


 


Another scaremongering non-issue.


 


 

Message 4 of 36
Latest reply

Julia Gillard's insidious legacy is union restoration



 


 

Message 5 of 36
Latest reply

Julia Gillard's insidious legacy is union restoration


did you know that Unions have  a right of entry into any workplace and can look through your personal records??? I find that very disturbing.. it is none of their business.. Unions now have way too much power and they are only representing 2% of the working population... 


 


Cat - Fair Work inspectors and unions can be granted access to employee records when a breach in regulation and law occurs.They can't just waltz in and demand to go through records on a whim.


 


How else would they find out if workers are being exploited? I would say it IS their business and it is in the best interest of employees. 


 


Another scaremongering non-issue.


 


 



 


 


Fine if it is fair work inspectors... no problem in my opinion... 


 


But the Union has no right to be in everyone's business... 


 


and who decides if there is a breach in the laws? Can they go in on a suspicion? 


 


the suspected contravention relates to or affects at least one member of the permit holder’s organisation


 



So one person can make up an allegation and the Union heavies can be called in... 


 


I would not want a union official coming into my workplace where unions are not active and go through my records on the words of one person that may or may not be a troublemaker.. 


 


I can remember the guy that worked in our family business... he was told to go home as he was a chronic  alcoholic and came to work drunk.. next day the guy called the union in and they wanted to talk to the whole workforce (18 people)... my Dad said yep.. you can talk to them a lunchtime and the other guys were so cheesed off that they were forced to listen to the union official on their lunch break... 


 


And I ran the canteen and as I was the "bosses daughter" I had to leave.. so the blokes had no lunches... 


 


yep.. Unions are great... 


 


that guy lasted another week.. he was told that if he came to work one more time with alcohol on his breath he would be sacked... he tried to use the union to keep him job but working with machinery he had no hope. 

Message 6 of 36
Latest reply

Julia Gillard's insidious legacy is union restoration

If unions have so much power, how come my previous  workplace has zero safety?


 


Toilets never cleaned.


A rat plague in the lunchroom.


Air quality issues.


Personal safety items not supllied.


No fride.


No access to clean water to drink.


 


How come the water used in my previous worplaces production process caused my immune systems white cell count to srop so low my GP thought I had cancer?


Other workers showing me rashes and filloicle infections from unclean non treated water?


 


Water testing results disappearing?


 


In the end I resigned for health reasons.


 


 


Yes the unions truly have taken over.......


 


Some of you regular wolf criers are just using unions as a usual scare tactic with zero life expirience in the matter and in the process hurting people who actually work  for a living.


 


U Disgust me.

Message 7 of 36
Latest reply

Julia Gillard's insidious legacy is union restoration

Yep topside....it's a takeover alright......Baton down the hatches, the reds are comin.....lmao


 


"Trade union membership has generally declined since 1992. From August 1992 to August 2011, the proportion of those who were trade union members in their main job has fallen from 43% to 18% for employees who were males and 35% to 18% for females.

There was, however, a small rise in trade union membership during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) period (2008-2009). This was largely driven by an increase in the proportion of male employees who were trade union members which was 19% in August 2008 and 20% in August 2009"


 


http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/6310.0main+features3August%202011


 


Wow, 20% of the Australian workforce are union members....they must be pretty militant to be controlling every Aussie workplace to such an extent.  Be afwaid...be vewy afwaid

Message 8 of 36
Latest reply

Julia Gillard's insidious legacy is union restoration

:^O huge thugs forcing their way in ..  (whoops my mistake, corrigan hired those guys)

Message 9 of 36
Latest reply

Julia Gillard's insidious legacy is union restoration


If unions have so much power, how come my previous  workplace has zero safety?


 


Toilets never cleaned.


A rat plague in the lunchroom.


Air quality issues.


Personal safety items not supllied.


No fride.


No access to clean water to drink.


 


How come the water used in my previous worplaces production process caused my immune systems white cell count to srop so low my GP thought I had cancer?


Other workers showing me rashes and filloicle infections from unclean non treated water?


 


Water testing results disappearing?


 


In the end I resigned for health reasons.


 


 


Yes the unions truly have taken over.......


 


Some of you regular wolf criers are just using unions as a usual scare tactic with zero life expirience in the matter and in the process hurting people who actually work  for a living.


 


U Disgust me.



 


 


lol.. if you were in a union they were doing a great job  NOT... if you weren't in a union then this is a classic example of where they can do good and should be called in... so to all the other government authorities that needed to be made aware. 


 


Personally I would just up and leave a workplace like that and report them... 


 


Unions have their place... they can be a good help in the right circumstances... BUT they should not run a   political party... 


 


That is my opinion and as far as I know I am still legally allowed to have one... ?:|

Message 10 of 36
Latest reply