on 30-01-2014 11:45 AM
NEW Zealand Prime Minister John Key says he supports changing the national flag but would hold a referendum before any decision was made to ditch the existing banner.
The current flag has attracted criticism because one corner features the Union Jack, the symbol of former colonial power Britain, with the remainder consisting of four stars representing the Southern Cross constellation.
Mr Key said he believed the flag should display a silver fern, the national emblem already used by New Zealand sporting teams such as the All Blacks.
"I'd like to see a change," he told reporters. "But firstly it's not the single biggest issue that we as a country face. And secondly, even with those who want to change, there's not universal support for what we should change to.
"My personal view is, silver fern's the right way to go."
Mr Key said the New Zealand public was split 50-50 on adopting a new flag and he planned to sound out senior ministers about the prospect of holding a referendum on the issue to coincide with a general election due later this year.
He said Canada, another former colony of Britain, had never regretted adopting its distinctive maple leaf flag in 1965.
"I know it was a ferocious debate in Canada, but in the end would any Canadians look back and say they got it wrong with the maple leaf?"
I like the Silver Fern.
Is it time for Australia to change it's flag? What would we use as our emblem?
on 30-01-2014 04:23 PM
@*mrgrizz* wrote:
@freakiness wrote:
@*mrgrizz* wrote:
@bluecat*dancing wrote:I hit the kudo button instead of the reply button! I'd like to see the union jack replaced with the Aboriginal flag.
what other country has a minority group represented on their flag?
By that definition we already do. Surely there are fewer British people here than Australian.
omg......i have to admit i was wrong
i did not consider that
My guess is that there are far more people here of British ancestry than there are of aboriginal ancestry, and a fair few of the aboriginals have at least as much, if not more, british dna in them than aboriginal.
If they were going to remove the union jack I would much rather see it replaced by some native flora or fauna. Most of which probably predates all human occupation of Australia and a flag should represent the country, not any one group of people, IMO.
I wonder what it would cost us to use the aboriginal flag, isnt it owned by someone?
30-01-2014 04:32 PM - edited 30-01-2014 04:33 PM
Okay, how about the National flag - minus the union jack - and the Aboriginal flag being flown side by side? They are both official flags of Australia as it is so simply remove the union jack.. Or replace it with the floral emblem of Australia.
on 30-01-2014 04:43 PM
@bluecat*dancing wrote:Okay, how about the National flag - minus the union jack - and the Aboriginal flag being flown side by side? They are both official flags of Australia as it is so simply remove the union jack.. Or replace it with the floral emblem of Australia.
The Golden Wattle?
Not quite like the maple leaf or the silver fern, is it?
on 30-01-2014 04:45 PM
on 30-01-2014 04:47 PM
on 30-01-2014 05:35 PM
The waratah could look striking and distinctive against the blue background.
on 30-01-2014 05:40 PM
on 30-01-2014 06:01 PM
I think a flag is best when children can draw it and don't need to have too much artistic talent.
What about the Eureka flag where the Union Jack is. We would end up with double stars but it would look good and easy for kids to copy.
on 30-01-2014 06:10 PM
Maybe add some green leaves?
30-01-2014 06:14 PM - edited 30-01-2014 06:14 PM
Given that the waratah is the state flower of NSW I suspect it's use might be inappropriate for the national flag - for those from other states at least.
On those grounds alone, you would have to also rule out Royal Bluebells (ACT), Sturt's Desert Rose (NT), Cooktown Orchid (Qld.), Sturt's Desert Pea (SA), Tasmanian Blue Gum (Tas), Pink Heath (Vic.) and the Red and Green Kangaroo Paw (WA) which I believe are the States individual floral emblems.