on 17-08-2014 01:14 PM
FOR all the government’s errors, what is the alternative, a move back to Labor?
It is time for a reality check. Labor has three disasters looming and they make the government’s troubles seem paltry.
But, first, let’s be honest about the government’s failings. Joe Hockey has botched the budget. It slapped everyone across the face yet failed to land a knockout punch in the area it needed to — government spending. This continues to rise. Look at what Hockey has actually achieved so far: high offence to all and increased income taxes on self-reliant and productive citizens. What an embarrassing feat.
The government has problems with public relations, too. Never mind links between abortion and breast cancer; there are proven links between saying stupid things and losing government.
Why would you say there is a “budget emergency”, yet keep spending? Why would you introduce two categories of people: lifters and leaners? Why not refer to low-income households instead of poor people? This language just makes everyone feel bad.
Why did Eric Abetz even go on The Project?
Why would Malcolm Turnbull go on television to say mums and dads will just have to be sued for internet piracy? It is not his place to urge corporations to sue citizens; he can afford overpriced downloads but plenty of people cannot.
Why would George Brandis, after his bigot faux pas, go on TV to do a lawyer’s tap dance around the definition of metadata? He came across as a dictatorial prig. Labor people must pray daily that he ends up with the industrial relations portfolio.
The biggest criticism I could make of this government’s image is this: on its bad days, instead of appearing to be focused on making life easier for us, it looks to be deliberately trying to make life harder, out of spite. Labor’s job is to paint reasonable government people as socially backward, economically mean elitists who want to punish the community. Too often, this job is made too easy.
But speaking of Labor, here is the brutal truth: within the next year, three processes will be finalised and disaster is bound to strike. These processes are two police investigations and a royal commission into union malfeasance.
The first police investigation is into the Australian Workers Union scandal. A police document says the police intend to charge Ralph Blewitt, Bruce Wilson and “others”. Last weekend, this paper published excerpts from a legal opinion that said there was enough evidence to suggest Julia Gillard’s involvement should be considered by a court.
Gillard has always strongly protested her innocence. It may be that she is blameless. If she isn’t charged, then the investigation will be painted as a Tory witch- hunt on an innocent woman and Tony Abbott’s accusation of law-breaking may look defamatory.
However, if Gillard is charged and convicted, the ALP team, already regarded as incompetent, will be known as the goons who put a criminal in the Lodge. That will be a disaster for them.
The second police investigation is into the very serious allegation of rape against a 16-year-old girl, many years ago. A senior Labor person has been under investigation for almost a year. The person has not been named in the media (if he were a footballer might this be different?) but anyone with an internet connection knows who he is.
When this investigation is finalised, one of two things will happen. Either charges will be laid, which will be a disaster for Labor, or charges will not be laid, and the complainant may make her story public, which will be a disaster for Labor.
The royal commission into trade unions is bound to be a disaster for Labor, as it no doubt will reveal embarrassing wrongdoing by ALP heavyweights.
Certain unions have long been known as the place grubs go to get their **bleep**s on the velvet. These unions, because of their cash reserves, buy the best ALP seats, the finest grade of velvet, reserved for the biggest grubs. I expect the commission to tip out at least two of these grubs, if neither police investigation does so first.
So, although the ALP is flying high, disasters are just around the corner. When these strike, the community will feel betrayed and let down, and it will turn to the government for leadership and support. These moments will represent political windfalls.
on 18-08-2014 04:50 PM
18-08-2014 05:08 PM - edited 18-08-2014 05:09 PM
So its OK for these politicians to do the same think I take it boris in your world?
More than a dozen Labor MPs own property in Canberra where they stay during parliamentary sitting weeks and also claim travel allowance.
These MPs include
Anthony Albanese,
Warren Snowden,
Tanya Plibersek
Joel Fitzgibbon,
Jim Chalmers,
Mark Butler,
Tony Burke
Doug Cameron.
Mark Butler
Julia Gillard and Kevin Rudd also owned property in Canberra before they retired from politics.
Every single politician gets the same $270.00 per night to stay in Canberr and elsewhere... But thats OK for you is it Boris?
This is OK in your world as well is it boris?
The shadow cabinet has been called to meet in Canberra on Monday, shortly after Mr Swan launches his book at the ANU,meaning frontbenchers can fly to the capital to attend and invoice taxpayers, and they also get their $270 per night to stay in Canberra and in their own homes.
So thats OK is it boris that the labor party has planed this so well and we the tax payers will pick up the bill....
on 18-08-2014 05:17 PM
on 18-08-2014 05:20 PM
@nero_wulf wrote:So its OK for these politicians to do the same think I take it boris in your world?
More than a dozen Labor MPs own property in Canberra where they stay during parliamentary sitting weeks and also claim travel allowance.
These MPs include
Anthony Albanese,
Warren Snowden,
Tanya Plibersek
Joel Fitzgibbon,
Jim Chalmers,
Mark Butler,
Tony Burke
Doug Cameron.
Mark Butler
Julia Gillard and Kevin Rudd also owned property in Canberra before they retired from politics.
Every single politician gets the same $270.00 per night to stay in Canberr and elsewhere... But thats OK for you is it Boris?
This is OK in your world as well is it boris?
The shadow cabinet has been called to meet in Canberra on Monday, shortly after Mr Swan launches his book at the ANU,meaning frontbenchers can fly to the capital to attend and invoice taxpayers, and they also get their $270 per night to stay in Canberra and in their own homes.
So thats OK is it boris that the labor party has planed this so well and we the tax payers will pick up the bill....
That list falls way short of the scores as claimed by Hokey.
Where are the other 3 dozen Labor members who have bought million dollar houses in Canberra to claim their entitlements on?
on 18-08-2014 05:28 PM
Sadly envy is alive and well in australia
It was a 300K house in 1997...... please get your facts correct
on 18-08-2014 05:52 PM - last edited on 18-08-2014 08:05 PM by gewens
Who are the other 40 labor members making the claim.
Yes, the fact is that after making over a million dollars profit on the house he still claims $270 per night to sleep there and has the hide to accuse others of feeling entitled. Yep, double standards fit Smokin, smirkin Joe like a second skin.
.
Sadly Hokey has the biggest sense of entitlement on display for all to see. It's a bit rude to insist anyone has a worse case of greed than he does.
on 18-08-2014 06:39 PM
nerowulf, well yes hockey and his cronies are certainly attempting to "conquer" the nation with their divisive, hateful ideology and are doing their very best at replacing our Australian hard work ethic with mass unemployment and dire poverty and yes hockey and his cronies certainly feel that they and theirs are owed many, many entitlements - I must draw a line at them being called Fabians, that's just over reaching, don't you think?
on 21-08-2014 03:54 PM
well here is one slur that the murdoch press and others can stop spreading around, not that the truth stops their dirty campaigns, how disappointing for the haters....
Labor leader Bill Shorten has broken his silence after being cleared by the Victorian Police of damaging rape allegations dating back to the 1980s.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/bill-shorten-opens-up-about-rape-allegations-2...
on 21-08-2014 04:07 PM
on 21-08-2014 04:14 PM
According to a source the complaint was made by someone with political leanings that don't match bills . a LNP stooge (with some encouragement from the usual sources of course )