on 21-05-2014 10:20 AM
Way to many welfare leaners and takers in this country now days
AFTER so irresponsibly dancing with his eight-year-old son in his office on budget night, and compounding the offence by allowing his wife to wear an elegant $750 Carla Zampatti dress, that cigar-chomping capitalist Joe Hockey made a speech. Towards the end, the Treasurer used the stirring phrase: “We are a nation of lifters, not leaners.”
It was an echo of Robert Menzies’ brilliant Forgotten People oration of 22 May, 1942, a paean to the middle class, the “backbone of the nation”, those self-reliant Australians who provide “the intelligent ambition which is the motive power of human progress”.
But judging by the savage reaction to the government’s first, rather moderate budget, Hockey’s assessment of the national character was wishful thinking.
The truth is that we are at the tipping point at which we switch from a nation of lifters to a nation of leaners. Right now only about half the country pays more in tax than they receive in benefits. They are the lifters.
And between 40 and 50 per cent of voters receive their income directly from the government, either in the form of benefits or because they work for the public service, according to the Centre for Independent Studies.
After six years of Labor profligacy, winding back the entitlement mentality is a huge task. No one is grateful for handouts but they scream when they are taken away.
Of course, it wouldn’t have mattered what kind of budget Messrs Hockey and Abbott brought down. Most of the feral reaction, like the weekend’s protest marches, was pre-arranged by wreckers who can’t stand a conservative government in power.
There are no depths to which the wreckers won’t stoop, from attacking Joe Hockey’s family to manhandling conservative female politicians arriving to speak at universities, to calling for the assassination of the PM.
This week, union leader Tony Sheldon, Labor’s national vice-president, even called his troops to war, advocating intimidation, blockades and civil disobedience.
“We must stand up to corporate money influencing politics,” he told a Transport Workers Union conference. “Using vehicles to block roads, sit-ins, go-slows, hundreds of trucks descending on Canberra — we’ll do it if we have to.”
Totalitarian violence is all the new Australian left has, which shows the bankruptcy of their arguments.
on 21-05-2014 01:38 PM
to boris
'An election's not uncalled for': Palmer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zg1VWlvrBYg
Voters have honestly had enough me thinks.
21-05-2014 01:39 PM - edited 21-05-2014 01:44 PM
From What is in Joe Hockey's mind:
...... however, of the one glaring exception to high income-earners’ insistence that tax increases be avoided at all cost (to other people). The one tax increase they lust after is a rise in the goods and services tax.
Why? Because they believe it will be part of a deal in which the higher GST paid by everyone is used to pay for another cut in the rate of company tax plus a cut in the top rate of income tax.
Only interested in assisting the higher income earners, the wealthy and companies.
on 21-05-2014 02:00 PM
to am*3
"Not everyone agrees with every part of the budget"
The majority do not.
How about getting the facts right? The disabled and aged pensioners ARE NOT LOSING their pensions.
Cutting spending but not increasing revenue (increasing taxes) is a fail in a budget.
Yes! am*3 ....this is the whole crux of this budget isn't it?! The latest attempt by this govt is to instill absolute FEAR into the populace about our economy - the result being that people have STOPPED SPENDING! Which is terrible for our economy.
This result in 'savings' will then be claimed by the Liberals as helping the deficit and look how great they are!
They are DOING NOTHING to encourage revenue.....value adding, jobs, manufacturing IN AUSTRALIA etc.
This govt are hell bent on TAKING our money - they think the answer is to make interest/money in bank accounts and then claim that this is revenue. Well it is a very empty, unrewarding and twisted way to make money IMO as there are no long term real rewards, for Australians with this approach.Having said this I think hitting Australians with more taxes would be justified if there were incentives for paying more tax and not just for the Fat Cats.
Efforts should always be rewarded.
am*3...... however, of the one glaring exception to high income-earners’ insistence that tax increases be avoided at all cost (to other people). The one tax increase they lust after is a rise in the goods and services tax.
Why? Because they believe it will be part of a deal in which the higher GST paid by everyone is used to pay for another cut in the rate of company tax plus a cut in the top rate of income tax.
Only interested in assisting the higher income earners, the wealthy and companies.
Yes again am*3. This govt knows they are only looking after their own-back slapping mates and Fat Cats in the top end of town. It is a very sick and unfair approach.
This is why most people are not happy. We're not blind or deaf!
Hitting us with a rise in a goods and services tax/es would be unjustified and very undemocratic at this stage.
This government serve no good purpose for the majority so they must go.
on 21-05-2014 02:25 PM
Tony Abbott caught on camera winking and smiling when confronted over budget by sex line worker
I can't cop this man and his attitudes towards women.
on 21-05-2014 02:40 PM
to polka.
Don't care if Abbott winks uncontrollably ......just can't wait for a Double Dissolution in the Senate to happen.
Bring on another election
on 21-05-2014 02:41 PM
The poor old lady She didn't sound well at all.
on 21-05-2014 02:45 PM
@am*3 wrote:
"Not everyone agrees with every part of the budget"
The majority do not.
How about getting the facts right? The disabled and aged pensioners ARE NOT LOSING their pensions.
How about reading? What I actually said waNot everyone agrees with every part of the budget. Certainly nobody wants to see the aged pensioners or disabled losing their benefits,
Cutting spending but not increasing revenue (increasing taxes) is a fail in a budget.
on 21-05-2014 02:48 PM
Cutting spending but not increasing revenue (increasing taxes) is a fail in a budget.
if they did increase taxes, it would just have been something else to complain abot
on 21-05-2014 02:51 PM
I think hitting Australians with more taxes would be justified if there were incentives for paying more tax and not just for the Fat Cats.
Efforts should always be rewarded.
21-05-2014 03:06 PM - edited 21-05-2014 03:08 PM
So the PM is not allowed to have a social evening with his colleagues enjoying some beverages and a few laughs?
in answer to posts 29 and 30