Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women

Only 44seconds video

The Problem of Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Voltaire: “Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” .
Message 1 of 132
Latest reply
131 REPLIES 131

Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women


@johcaschro wrote:

 

She was horrified by their reaction. "What exactly do you want?" one of the students shouted. "That's what women can expect if they walk around there at night!"

 

 


So, one kid shouted and that is proof or you how evil Islam is that is has to be banned?  I can asure you, many people in our society  would agree, and just because they do not shout it, does not mean that they do not think it.  I bet many preachers and priests would agree.  They just know better than to say it.  But don;t you think it's weird that  our society conditions girls from the earliest age  to be sexy, and they are packaged as  sex objects, and then men are told they are not allowed to consider them sex object? 

 

Fight for women's rights is over 100 years old and not only we have a long way to go, but sometimes I think we are going backwards.  For many young women being called "feminist" is an insult.  Attitude of men towards women is often pretty horrid, and reflected in the DV numbers here in Australia.  The behaviour of Mitchell Pearce and other sportsmen illustrates that well. 

 

Do you really think that women like Malala Yousafzai are forced to cover their hair?  Actually, Muslim countries have much better record of women in power than Australia, and if you look at the right passages in Koran that women are given the right to be involved in running their countries.  Just look what we did to Julia Gillard. 

 

So, you consider Hijab symbol of oppression, and you cannot see that some women who decided to wear it do not agree with you.  Islam has to be reformed by Muslims themselves, it cannot be reformed by outsiders.  

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Voltaire: “Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” .
Message 121 of 132
Latest reply

Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women


@icyfroth wrote:

That's the thing. It's passed down from mother to daughter.

 

And mother would pass it on because she would be under pressure from her community to do so.



@icyfroth wrote:

That's the thing. It's passed down from mother to daughter.

 

And mother would pass it on because she would be under pressure from her community to do so.


Just like FGM is I guess. The child has no say in the matter. The rights of the child are ignored and this is something our country has signed an international agreement on.

Message 122 of 132
Latest reply

Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women

I think you'll find that orthodox muslim communities don't give a rat's backside about international agreements. They have obedience to their interpretation of religion and cultural practices and believe it to be higher than any other law.

Message 123 of 132
Latest reply

Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women

How can you, or anyone, equate FMG to the wearing of a hijab?

**************************

"There is nothing more; but I want nothing more." Christopher Hitchins
Message 124 of 132
Latest reply

Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women


@djilukjilly wrote:


Just like FGM is I guess. The child has no say in the matter. The rights of the child are ignored and this is something our country has signed an international agreement on.


FMG is something practised in parts of Africa, it is not religious, it's cultural, and has nothing to do with wearing Hijab.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Voltaire: “Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” .
Message 125 of 132
Latest reply

Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women


@icyfroth wrote:

I think you'll find that orthodox muslim communities don't give a rat's backside about international agreements. They have obedience to their interpretation of religion and cultural practices and believe it to be higher than any other law.


Sounds like a lot of our current politicians  who have  decided what is best for us regarding anything remotely in conflict with their own zealous religious beliefs.

Message 126 of 132
Latest reply

Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women


@johcaschro wrote:
 
 

"The Erich Gutenberg College is a trade school in Mülheim, an economically underdeveloped district in Cologne. Two-thirds of the students here are first- or second-generation immigrants, and most are Muslim. A few days after the incidents in Cologne on New Year's Eve, in which a large crowd of men with supposed immigrant backgrounds harassed and sexually assaulted women in the city's main train station, a female teacher stood in front of her class at the school and tried to talk to her students about that night's events.

 

She was horrified by their reaction. "What exactly do you want?" one of the students shouted. "That's what women can expect if they walk around there at night!" No one in the classroom protested. The girls were silent."

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/sexism-and-islam-debated-in-germany-after-cologne-attack...

 

 I have zero sympathy for the teacher. Islam is a priapic religion so why was she horrified? Western governments have been foolish to go on this mad quest to welcome muslims into their countries in the hope that all will be well. Any immigration program should be well thought out rather than crossing your fingers and hoping all will go well.

 

As Geert Wilders has pointed out all that has been achieved over the last 5 months or so is that thousands of testosterone bombs have arrived in Europe. But let's not worry because we have intelligent politicians and the ever helpful UN to steer us.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



@johcaschro wrote:
 
 

"The Erich Gutenberg College is a trade school in Mülheim, an economically underdeveloped district in Cologne. Two-thirds of the students here are first- or second-generation immigrants, and most are Muslim. A few days after the incidents in Cologne on New Year's Eve, in which a large crowd of men with supposed immigrant backgrounds harassed and sexually assaulted women in the city's main train station, a female teacher stood in front of her class at the school and tried to talk to her students about that night's events.

 

She was horrified by their reaction. "What exactly do you want?" one of the students shouted. "That's what women can expect if they walk around there at night!" No one in the classroom protested. The girls were silent."

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/sexism-and-islam-debated-in-germany-after-cologne-attack...

 

 

That's what women can expect if they walk around here at night. That's what women can expect if they walk around without wearing hijab?

 

What women should expect is that the systematic teaching (a systematic religious teaching; a systematic Islamic religious teaching) that women can "expect" to be abused if they refuse to submit to a dress code imposed by by supposedly religious men, is a teaching which should be consigned to the rubbish bin of history as being total and absolute noxious garbage, poisoning all of those who come into contact with such ideas.

 

 

There is no elegance in hijab. There is no beauty in hijab. There is no grace whatsoever in a symbol of oppression.

 

There is nothing which is deserving of support in the teaching of, and the tolerance of, oppression of women.

 

Hijab is a reflection of attitudes and of values. It is a reflection of an attitude which values women only in a role which is subordinate to men.

 

It is an attitude which is  oppressive, repressive and ugly in its violence; and it is a violence. A violence acted out on women and sanctioned as virtue by those who submit to and who teach  Islam.

 

Its an institutionalised form of violence. a religiously sanctioned form of violence.

 

a culturally sanctioned form of violence.

 

 

It's a thought-form from hell.

 

Let's not support oppression. Let's support and promote equality of the sexes and freedom of thought and action for everyone.

 

Let's agree to drop our support for and our rationalisations of a system which espouses oppression and subjection of women.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Message 127 of 132
Latest reply

Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women

 

 "I have zero sympathy for the teacher. Islam is a priapic religion so why was she horrified? Western governments have been foolish to go on this mad quest to welcome muslims into their countries in the hope that all will be well. Any immigration program should be well thought out rather than crossing your fingers and hoping all will go well.

 

As Geert Wilders has pointed out all that has been achieved over the last 5 months or so is that thousands of testosterone bombs have arrived in Europe. But let's not worry because we have intelligent politicians and the ever helpful UN to steer us."

 

 

 

I don't think you're getting the 'big picture'.

 

 

 

The immigrant crisis has been deliberately engineered by big business interests who want to flood the labour market with unskilled job-seekers who will work for a lot less than the native Germans.

 

Why out-source your jobs to India or the Phillipines when you can in-source your employees and have them work for less on your home soil?

 

The immigrants (who can actually get a job) depress the cost of wages by very virtue of their numbers. Those who find work pay taxes to the govt and the govt uses those taxes to provide pensions to their elderly retired citizens. (a thing which Germany is in dire need of)

 

Another side of this cynical excercise is that by enticing mass immigration of people who appear to be a little bit lax in their observance of the law, the govt then has an excuse for introducing more and ever  greater "security" legislation. Tap your phone? no need for a warrant if we're pursuing "terrorists"

 

Scan your emails and store your mobile phone usage data and track your movements and have cctv cameras on every street corner which are enabled with the latest face-recognition technology? . . . sure, we're pursuing "terrorists" and making your community a safer (if much more surveilled) place to live in.

 

Enforce curfews?

 

Arrests without regard to "probable cause" but only because we say that you might be a security threat.

 

Incarceration without any charges being laid against you? Sure, why not?

 

 

Sling you into detention without a warrant? Sure, you might be a terrorist. well, you might be, mightn't you?

 

Magna Carta is only a god-damned piece of paper anyway, isn't it?

 

 

 

Bomb their countries to secure their mineral assets, create a refugee "crisis" which we "reasonably" have to respond to, being reasonable people, and then introduce all sorts of draconian laws to better control our population who might have the temerity to suggest that they're being ripped off by being payed low wages while facing ever increasing costs.

 

Thoroughly mix up the populations of countries by flooding them with refugess and so diluting and reducing the number who feel they owe a primary  allegiance to the country. 

 

Muslim immigrants are the very best because their primary allegiance is not to the country where they live, but to their religion and even better, they are in schism, owing no allegiance to their fellow Muslims in general, but only to their especial sect of Islam We don't want no stinking solidarity here,organising and forming unions and  messing with our aim of maximizing our profits.

 

 

It's a scam.

 

 

Message 128 of 132
Latest reply

Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women


@***super_nova*** wrote:

@johcaschro wrote:

 

She was horrified by their reaction. "What exactly do you want?" one of the students shouted. "That's what women can expect if they walk around there at night!"

 

 


So, one kid shouted and that is proof or you how evil Islam is that is has to be banned?  I can asure you, many people in our society  would agree, and just because they do not shout it, does not mean that they do not think it.  I bet many preachers and priests would agree.  They just know better than to say it.  But don;t you think it's weird that  our society conditions girls from the earliest age  to be sexy, and they are packaged as  sex objects, and then men are told they are not allowed to consider them sex object? 

 

Fight for women's rights is over 100 years old and not only we have a long way to go, but sometimes I think we are going backwards.  For many young women being called "feminist" is an insult.  Attitude of men towards women is often pretty horrid, and reflected in the DV numbers here in Australia.  The behaviour of Mitchell Pearce and other sportsmen illustrates that well. 

 

Do you really think that women like Malala Yousafzai are forced to cover their hair?  Actually, Muslim countries have much better record of women in power than Australia, and if you look at the right passages in Koran that women are given the right to be involved in running their countries.  Just look what we did to Julia Gillard. 

 

So, you consider Hijab symbol of oppression, and you cannot see that some women who decided to wear it do not agree with you.  Islam has to be reformed by Muslims themselves, it cannot be reformed by outsiders.  


Our society is a capitalist one. people make money by encouraging "fashions" and then selling fasionable clothing, perfumes, eye-liners, magazines, etc.

 

 

Malala Yousafzai was shot in the face by Islamic fundamentalists because she offended them by claiming her right to pursue an education.

 

I mean, come on, she's only a woman, what does she need with an education anyway?

 

Her hijab offered no protection to that bullet.

 

 

The hijab that she was indeed compelled to wear.

 

 

That cry of "What exactly do you want?" is not the cry of one singular student. it is the cry of a whole lot of people who follow a creed which holds that women are the natural subjects of men and should conduct themselves accordingly.

 

 

You know this and for you to claim it is only one person's cry is to be disingenuous.

 

Women who choose to wear hijab do so out of their agreement and internalisation of the islamic doctrine that by their display of a little hair, a little flash of flesh, a sparkling smile, that they are responsible for inflaming an uncontrollable passion in the observant men and that therefore it's no fault of the men if they cannot control themselves and it gives them permission to grope, harrass and even rape women who so wantonly proke them. (see Cologne, new years eve 20016)

 

 

It is a fault of the men. it is a fault in what they are being taught. it is a fault of Islam that it teaches women to cover up because it's the womens' fault.

 

 

It's NOT the women's fault. it's the men's fault. it's the religion's fault for teaching them such horrible ideas.

 

 

 

The hijab is a marker of an attitude. That attitude is that it's the women who are responsible for how men act.

 

The men shirk their responsibility to behave like decent and civilised individuals because they are taught some very dodgy lessons from their very birth.

 

Let's have no "political correctness" touchy-feely, we're so-understanding-of-cultural-difference here

 

 

Let's call a spade a spade.

 

 

Hijab is an oppressive rag, symbolising the subjection of women. It doesn't matter if it's made of silk and adorned with gems; it stands for something; it signifies something.

 

Understand what it signifies. understand what it means. Why any Western woman would defend the wearing of such a badge of oppression is beyond my ken.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Message 129 of 132
Latest reply

Linking Hijab to Oppression of Women

Just because to you, a westerner, hijab is a symbol  is irrelevant,  As is it irrelevant what I think, but I am just saying what Muslim women told me, and how they explained why they chose to wear hijab.  And there was a time when I had problem understanding why would they choose it.   But i learned to respect other people's decisions even if I do not agree with them.

 

Of-course, it is up to men to control themselves, and for foreigners to realise that when western woman is jiggling her **bleep** in their face and showing her buttocks from under her short skirt, she actually does not mean anything by it.  It's the fashion stupid!  And rape is rape.  But some women do prefer not to let it all hang out. 

 

You sound just like some feminist friends of mine back in 70s when they criticised me for choosing to  be home with kids, when frankly, I enjoyed being at home instead of working stressful 10 hour days.  Funnily, the same women would call on their male neighbors if they needed to nail a nail to the wall.  LOL

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Voltaire: “Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” .
Message 130 of 132
Latest reply