Luvvies Rule

[lightningdance]

Luvvies just can't take a good old fashioned dose of reality that is posted on here about the dysfunctional chaotic spectacle we see every day by this ( "disgraceful" uttered by it's own members) Labor party.

Luvvies are a bit like lemmings, blindly following their beloved party over the cliff that has reared up in front of them. Blindly castigating any poster who has the temerity to post anything they can't abide,  disregarding any accredited journalistic article that dares publish up a true picture of just what is happening to our country & our parliament.

They have successfully limited the number of Conservative posters who participate on here, rubbed out any scintilla of debate for endless bp'ing & bullying snipes.

Well I have a good store of CROW stored in my larder & I will be serving it up by the shovelfull to the luvvies after the likes of Gillard & her ilk have been dispatched.

[cherry*135]

The thread is called Luvvies Rule. So, one would expect  the Luvvies (who/whatever they are) would have free range in a thread with that title and one wouldn't complain if they did.

[lakeland27]

And yet here you all are, backing each other up, phoney outrage, endless c&p from the tut tutter to back herself up because as far as I can tell doesn't have an original thought in her head.

Poor lemmings, the comment from some here is  nothing short of laughable, you have achieved your aim to have threads you don't like deleted, the highly insulted saying a woman could speak like that.

Who are you lot trying to kid?? you are all guilty of  trying to whip up indignation.

What are you all flocking onto this thread for if not to put a bit of stick about.

what do you seriously expect. fawning agreement and universal acceptance ? it makes no sense at all to expect that.. it could only really mean a person enjoys it on some level if they participate in these conversations

[cherry*135]

Bit of a goose?

Bring it on: independent MPs challenge Tony Abbott to put up no-confidence motion

KEY crossbenchers have challenged Tony Abbott to put up his proposed no-confidence motion next week, amid clear signs the vote would confirm support for Julia Gillard's minority government on the floor of parliament.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/coalition-pushes-for-early-poll/story-fn59niix-1226...

[poddster]

what is this thread about ?

Crow, and the ingestion thereof 🙂

[jonnjenn]

You verily are one podd.

 lol.

[Anonymous]

who are the luvvies? name and shame. :p. no really, I have no clue who is a luvvie and who isnt.?:|

[Anonymous]

am I a luvvie? lol

[izabsmiling]

When the OP says luvvies it usually refers to people/posters (all of them) who have a different political view to them 

[lakeland27]

who are the luvvies? name and shame. :p. no really, I have no clue who is a luvvie and who isnt.?:|

you are a luvvie for sure duff. i doubt you'd see eye to eye with piers akerman. i think he changed the usage of the word in recent times to a scornful jibe aimed at anyone to the left of attla the hun etc.

[Anonymous]

oh lol. okay. yep don't like him, he annoys me.