MRAPs For Mayberry

Darrin McBreen- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK0_iapa54E -breaks down how MRAPs are being used in suburbs and small towns.

 

A gun control advocate- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgOjwDOaDJ0  is attracting controversy after she released a PSA video encouraging children to inform on their parents by stealing their firearms and bringing them to school, an act that would result in numerous felony charges.

 

Forget “grooming the stool”. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aBjmxp6XmM - When the cult of the omnipotent state in America wants to venerate its leader, it declares his stool a matter of “national security” as we saw back in 2006. The public, however, will be treated as excrement, spied upon and **bleep**-ized in the name of the War on Drugs.

 

.

.

Fun Factor : Now you have a choice in chat, factor that
Message 1 of 24
Latest reply
23 REPLIES 23

MRAPs For Mayberry

The reason police forces are acquiring these vehicles is because the quality of firearms the "gun nuts" are stocking up on has increased dramatically.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzO873wxb1w

Message 2 of 24
Latest reply

MRAPs For Mayberry

The last time I saw the word "Mayberry" was the Andy Griffith Show.Smiley LOL

 

DEB

Message 3 of 24
Latest reply

MRAPs For Mayberry

The reason police forces are acquiring these vehicles is because the quality of firearms the "gun nuts" are stocking up on has increased dramatically.

 

Ok, anybody that owns collects or carrys guns is a gun nut, why not call them a terrorist?, a school shooter?, this is how you justify a police state tyranny. you see it right here folks, mark down that reply, make a note, we have a volunteer for the globalist aganda posting here.

 

Anyone who exersizes their rights is a nut of some kind. thats just crazy, to want personal freedom . no ones stopping you from not having guns, don't impose your choice not to have guns on others.

 

BTW all guns are assualt weapons, or can very easally fit into that catogory. you ban any one of them, you may as well ban them all. then the only kind of people who will have them are the same kind of people who brutally raped me. you think they will stop with me?

 

 

The last time I saw the word "Mayberry" was the Andy Griffith Show.

 

it's used by some as a term to describe a small town, maybe where more people know eachother, where dare i say it, the sheriff is a friend to the community and serves the people. not whips it into submission. what better way to turn the small town sheriffs against the people than to give them some cool toys to play with. theres only one reason for a toy like that, the sheriff on that TV show wouldn't even carry a gun and he wouldn't flip out when he seen legal open carry in public.

.

Fun Factor : Now you have a choice in chat, factor that
Message 4 of 24
Latest reply

MRAPs For Mayberry

Ok, anybody that owns collects or carrys guns is a gun nut,

 

Perhaps in your definition........my definition of a gun nut is one who feels he has the right to own any firearm, whether allowed by the authorities or not, and objects to the most reasonable legislation requiring registration or licensing.

 

And don't give me any bushwa about a "God given right", because it isn't......the 2nd Amendment is a man-derived document, and has already been determined to have limitations.

 

As far as I'm concerned, the far-right fundies who advocate "taking back the government" by force of arms are terrorists, and I really hope the Feds are maintaining lists of said individuals.

Message 5 of 24
Latest reply

MRAPs For Mayberry

 

this one

 

A bit disingenious of you to use the North Hollywood shoot out as an example of why MRAP's are needed.

 

ONE Police Officer with ONE Accurate rifle could have taken down both of the perps in North Hollywood that day.

All it required was one head shot.

 

In the end, a foot shot was required to take one down followed by a few more body shots while

he was on the ground and then let him bleed out so he had little chance of survivial before the

Ambos were allowed near him (which was a sensible decision).

 

I could think of far better reasons than the one you suggested.

 

 

 

The reaosn people object to "and objects to the most reasonable legislation requiring registration or licensing."

is because what starts out as what some mkight consider "reasonable" is the thin end of the wedge and takes

a UN agenda / perspective very quickly. So the rule is within us, a blanket NO.

 

 

 

 

Message 6 of 24
Latest reply

MRAPs For Mayberry

 

this one

 

"As far as I'm concerned, the far-right fundies who advocate "taking back the government" by force of arms are terrorists, and I really hope the Feds are maintaining lists of said individuals."

 

 

The US Gov't has just as many right wing organisations on it's lists as left wing ones.

 

 

 

 

Message 7 of 24
Latest reply

MRAPs For Mayberry

Ah, but back then police officers weren't issued "accurate rifles".........and while it is easy to say, it's quite difficult to make a head shot on a moving target (although, to be fair, a Medford police officer made a head shot at about 50 feet, when the 9mm body shots were ineffective due to a kevlar vest), and these jokers were moving.  It was following this that LAPD squad cars carried an M-16 in the trunk.

Message 8 of 24
Latest reply

MRAPs For Mayberry

And, how's that sports team doing? 🙂

Message 9 of 24
Latest reply

MRAPs For Mayberry


I realise that and this is why they are now issued with M16's.

 

 

50 feet isn't that far and "moving" ?  They were barely moving.

 

 

Moving is a running person or animal at 100 yards and doing a head shot which isn't that hard.

 

 

 

Message 10 of 24
Latest reply