on 20-01-2014 03:23 PM
Do you have anything against it?
Why?
What about other religions? Buddhists and Christians, are they ok?
Comments welcome 🙂
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 22-01-2014 01:36 AM
The thing about living in a democracy (actually, it's a representative democracy) is that the citizens get to vote for political parties which will represent their views.
So, once a population of people who have particular views achieves a certain numerical significance in a community (a state or even a country), then by virtue of the fair representative democratic process, those people will tend to vote for politicians who promote their wishes and their political views.
So, ok . . . once a certain percentage of the population is, say, Muslim, for example . . . then this group is going to want a voice in government and will try to elect representatives who will reflect the views and wishes of their constituents.
I'm sure you can extrapolate my argument from here.
on 22-01-2014 11:36 AM
@lind9650 wrote:I have nothing against people of any religion, as long as they come here the legitimate way and accept our laws, and don't try to change things to their liking or beliefs.
Before I cme to Australia, my father told me; "You are going to a new country, you will have to learn the language, the laws and assimilate with local people if you want to become one of them and be accepted for the peron you are."
So you're a Peron.No wonder you left Argentina 🙂
on 22-01-2014 11:46 AM
I wonder why that concept doesn't apply to the people who move into a neighbourhood? one that is already established as a conservative, respectful one?
on 22-01-2014 08:19 PM
@acacia_pycnantha wrote:@I just watched the docco @ your link.
and I recommend it to everyone here.
watched it too, thanks.
on
22-01-2014
11:57 PM
- last edited on
23-01-2014
04:57 AM
by
underbat
@acacia_pycnantha wrote:
The thing about living in a democracy (actually, it's a representative democracy) is that the citizens get to vote for political parties which will represent their views.
So, once a population of people who have particular views achieves a certain numerical significance in a community (a state or even a country), then by virtue of the fair representative democratic process, those people will tend to vote for politicians who promote their wishes and their political views.
So, ok . . . once a certain percentage of the population is, say, Muslim, for example . . . then this group is going to want a voice in government and will try to elect representatives who will reflect the views and wishes of their constituents.
I'm sure you can extrapolate my argument from here.
That's what the Irish were going to do, Acacia. They were going to outbreed the staunch, British protestants - because everyone "knows" Catholics breed like rabbits (sarc). They were going to flood the ballotboxes with Papist votes and wthin few generations we were going to have a government that that would cut our ties with the British throne, force us all to become papists and deliver us into the hands of Rome. That was about 160 years ago, has it happened yet?
Mind you, we do now have a Jesuit educated prime Minister ..................
on 23-01-2014 02:27 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@acacia_pycnantha wrote:The thing about living in a democracy (actually, it's a representative democracy) is that the citizens get to vote for political parties which will represent their views.
So, once a population of people who have particular views achieves a certain numerical significance in a community (a state or even a country), then by virtue of the fair representative democratic process, those people will tend to vote for politicians who promote their wishes and their political views.
So, ok . . . once a certain percentage of the population is, say, Muslim, for example . . . then this group is going to want a voice in government and will try to elect representatives who will reflect the views and wishes of their constituents.
I'm sure you can extrapolate my argument from here.
That's what the Irish were going to do, Acacia. They were going to outbreed the staunch, British protestants - because everyone "knows" Catholics breed like rabbits (sarc). They were going to flood the ballotboxes with Papist votes and wthin few generations we were going to have a government that that would cut our ties with the British throne, force us all to become papists and deliver us into the hands of Rome. That was about 160 years ago, has it happened yet?
Mind you, we do now have a Jesuit educated prime Minister ..................
Well exactly!!! We now have a PM pushing his Catholic agenda. Not right, is it?
on 23-01-2014 03:33 PM
Well exactly!!! We now have a PM pushing his Catholic agenda. Not right, is it?
No, but if he goes too far and bleeps off enough people, we have the ability to kick him out in a few years time and elect a less reactionary Government.
The same thing would apply if we had a Muslim Prime Minister.
The only way this country will ever be governed by Sharia Law will be if the majority of Australians decide that's what they want.
on 23-01-2014 04:22 PM
@spotweldersfriend wrote:
@lind9650 wrote:I have nothing against people of any religion, as long as they come here the legitimate way and accept our laws, and don't try to change things to their liking or beliefs.
Before I cme to Australia, my father told me; "You are going to a new country, you will have to learn the language, the laws and assimilate with local people if you want to become one of them and be accepted for the peron you are."
So you're a Peron.No wonder you left Argentina 🙂
Thank you, spotweldersfriend.
I always knew you were a gentleman of great wisdom and impecable tact.
Erica