Our freedoms safe - for now

idlewhile
Community Member

Our freedoms safe - for now


THE Gillard government's backdown on its outrageous media regulation and anti-free-speech discrimination laws is welcome. But it's terrible that in 2013, in a liberal democracy like Australia, we even had to have the debate.


 


Australians should never have to worry about losing their right to free speech. But the sad truth is that the Left has abandoned freedom of speech. It's only because of a significant public backlash against these laws that the government has shelved its attempt for now. This saga is a warning for all parties. The Australian people are fed up with governments trampling on their rights.


 


Communications Minister Stephen Conroy was forced to admit the government did not have the support in the parliament to pass its media regulation package.


 


The laws would have introduced a government-appointed Public Interest Media Advocate to police the media. The government even threatened to strip away the protections journalists need to do their jobs.


The change would effectively have introduced press licensing into Australia for the first time.


 


On Wednesday, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus announced that the government would not proceed with the draft Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill 2012, pushed by his predecessor, Nicola Roxon.


This outrageous draft bill would have made it unlawful to offend or insult a person at work because of attributes such as their political opinion, social origin or religious belief.


This aspect of the proposal represented a dangerous threat to free speech.


 


In a breathtaking attack on fundamental legal rights, the draft bill also reversed the burden of proof. Those accused of discrimination would have been forced to prove they were innocent, as opposed to normal legal practice where the complainant must make out all the elements of their case.


By reversing the onus of proof, the draft bill turned on its head the presumption that a person is innocent until proven guilty.


The draft bill also proposed to force defendants to pay their own legal costs even where they won against a vexatious litigant.


 


Worryingly, the loudest voices in favour of these restrictions on freedom of speech came from taxpayer-funded bodies, such as the Australian Human Rights Commission.


It is a damning indictment on these organisations that they failed to stand up for freedom of speech when it was under a very real threat.


Doubly so because they were shown up by ordinary members of the Australian community whose taxpayer dollars they use to fund their incessant lobbying.


 


Free speech and a free press are essential to effective democracy. It is alarming that one of Australia's two major political parties was willing to undermine such fundamental rights in a petty vendetta against media outlets fulfilling their role of scrutinising government policies.


 


by: Simon Breheny


 


The fight for our democracy & our freedoms will never be over whilst Labor is in power. The media bill brought them to their knees but never think for a minute they have given up trying to regulate our lives & take away our freedoms.


 


The Anti discrimination bill is just another backdoor way to restrict us but luckily Roxon has gone & Drefus knew  it would never fly.


 

Message 1 of 22
Latest reply
21 REPLIES 21

Our freedoms safe - for now

Socialism or communism??????

Message 2 of 22
Latest reply

Our freedoms safe - for now

silverfaun
Community Member


 


Straight out of the communist manifesto. No such thing as freedom of speech or freedom of the press here. She's doing what she was brought up to do.

Message 3 of 22
Latest reply

Our freedoms safe - for now

silverfaun
Community Member

A 'sad and extraordinary day': Kerry Stokes


 


KERRY Stokes has issued a personal statement in which he said the chaos engulfing the Gillard government marked "a sad and extraordinary day" and paid tribute to three departing ministers.


 


“The country has lost three outstanding ministers in Simon Crean, Martin Ferguson and Chris Bowen,” the media tycoon said, “each of whom have contributed greatly to our country and put the interests of all Australians above all else, and earned the respect and trust of those people they've engaged with in the management of their challenging portfolios.”


 


The loss of the three ministers is keenly felt by the chairman of diversified investment group Seven Group Holdings, which has a significant business in the mining resource sector.


 


Mr Ferguson in particular was well regarded by Mr Stokes for his management of the resources portfolio, a critical brief in the billionaire’s home state of Western Australia, where the Channel Seven owner also owns Westrac – the Caterpillar mining equipment franchise.


 


The statement comes at the end of a week in which the rarely seen Mr Stokes has been highly visible after appearing before a public parliamentary committee hearing in Canberra on Monday.


 


Mr Stokes lobbied hard against the ill-fated media reforms package which the Labor government failed to pass through parliament, leading to the current crisis within the party.


Yesterday, Mr Stokes adopted a conciliatory stance as he welcomed the government's decision to withdraw its highly contentious media reform bills package.


 


"We had expressed reservations about both the content of these bills and, in particular, the process," Mr Stokes said in reference to the speed with which the government had pursued its reforms.


"Media policy is vital to the democratic health of our country."


 

Message 4 of 22
Latest reply

Our freedoms safe - for now

This makes an interesting read.  Written just before the last election.


 


http://www.fli.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Julia.pdf

Message 5 of 22
Latest reply

Our freedoms safe - for now

Where are the limits to free speech?  Is phone hacking acceptable?  Are photos of celebrities taken in a private location acceptable?  Is it decent to have journalists at your front door when your child has just died?  Is it acceptable to have your raped under-ten year old child's photos published without parental consent?  Is it fair to have the picture of a 10 year old child published when they have been killed at age 17 to gain sympathy?  Is it decent to "doctor" a telephone conversation to make it appear that the caller was a racist?  


 


Is it wonderful that so many journalists now write opinion pieces, or opinion based pieces instead of the fact?  Is it great that journalists like Margo Kingston have felt that they have no  option than to leave mainstream media?  Is it good that there are so many "shock jocks" who forge peoples' opinions, despite their views being one-party political?  


 


I remember the good old days where you could read a paper, get the facts, follow in-depth reporting on issues, see the opinions from ALL sides ... I remember when good journalism was pretty much standard ... now it is unusual.  


 


(I do have to throw in kudos to the ABC here).  


 


I do think the media should be regulated.  I am not sure that the Conroy bills were going to do anything of import ... but journalism in the mainstream today is shoddy, lying, cheap, dishonest, sensationalist, surface (not deep) ... 


 


I would like to see integrity in the media restored.  


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Message 6 of 22
Latest reply

Our freedoms safe - for now

RI, perhaps NW now has a compatriot in the copy and paste of others somewhat biased (The Australian) articles, without any of their own background research.


"anti-free-speech discrimination laws"


 


What rot, The Advocate would have been responsible for the establishment of self-regulatory bodies to oversight the operation of the media and ensure that those bodies enforce their own rules.


 


Here  was the proposed Public Interest Media Advocate Bill 2013:-


http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fems%2Fr4993_ems_6d4ee109-01c1-4188-af1e-b4c94895190a%22


 


PS


Simon Breheny is director of the legal rights project at the Institute of Public Affairs. A somewhat "righty" bunch .


 

Message 7 of 22
Latest reply

Our freedoms safe - for now

by bernard keane


 


But the press’s capacity to objectively report what it claims to be a crucial issue has been, to say the least, found wanting. News Limited again demonstrated that its coverage of key issues is directed by the commercial and partisan agenda of its proprietor and executives, to the extent of simply inventing stories and falsely attributing views to individuals. Actual analysis of the reforms, whether at News Ltd or anywhere else, has been alarmingly limited, to the extent that actual problems with the package, such as the uncertain nature of a public interest test, were ignored in favour of shrill warnings of Stalinism.


Meantime Fairfax, which also strongly opposes the media reform package but where that opposition has been expressed less via reporting than via editorialising and op-eds, has focused obsessively and relentlessly on the Labor leadership, devoting swathes of coverage to it even when there is nothing new to say and insisting it “stands by” stories that have been dismissed as false by the people who featured in them.


This isn’t about the press gallery, which isn’t the monolith that its critics believe it is, and it’s not to say there haven’t been good journalists doing their jobs properly in either News Ltd or Fairfax (see, for example, Katharine Murphy’s excellent piece on the media reform package of a few days ago). It’s about how we’ve been failed by our newspapers on w...


I suggested above we can’t change our press as readily as parties can dump leaders or voters can dump governments. But we are, slowly, dumping newspapers. The two companies that have failed so badly are the two companies that are facing a struggle to survive as the internet destroys their revenue. What will a world without quality journalism be like when newspapers die, the refrain goes. In recent weeks, News Ltd and Fairfax have shown exactly what it will be like.

Message 8 of 22
Latest reply

Our freedoms safe - for now

silverfaun
Community Member

Anybody who "asks" for restrictions on ANY of our freedoms are transparent in their support for Labor & the socialist agenda of Labor, it is a shameful act.


 


Posting an alternative view is OK by me but this little scenario of Conroy & Gillard is  now a  part of their history, the legacy Gillard wanted to be remembered by will be this shameful act., they tried it, had to pull it & it nearly brought her down.


 


It won't be forgotten when Sept 14th rolls around.

Message 9 of 22
Latest reply

Our freedoms safe - for now

Hands up anyone who has read the 4 proposed Conroy bills that were withdrawn, or even the jumping up and down one:-  


......................................................................................................................


......................................................................................................................


......................................................................................................................?


 


 Not another long copied article!


How do you suffer this comment LL: "it’s not to say there haven’t been good journalists doing their jobs properly in either News Ltd or Fairfax"


 


I follow Keane/Crikey, but since his utterances and stand apropos Assange, reach for the sodium chloride when reading some of his stuff.

Message 10 of 22
Latest reply