27-04-2015 04:52 PM - edited 27-04-2015 04:53 PM
PepsiCo said it would switch to sucralose, a less controversial but still artificial sweetener. The beverage giant said the change—the boldest soda reformulation since Coca-Cola's New Coke fiasco—was in response to consumer surveys showing aspartame as the No. 1 reason Americans are shunning diet colas.
The new sweetener is a blend of sucralose and acesulfame potassium that will be used in Diet Pepsi, Caffeine Free Diet Pepsi and Wild Cherry Diet Pepsi in the U.S. beginning in August. The new sweetener formulation “was developed after extensive research and testing with U.S. diet cola drinkers,” the company said.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a public health group and soft drink critic, said Friday that, while consumers should still avoid acesulfame potassium, more commonly known as Ace K, sucralose is “likely’’ a safer sweetener than aspartame. It cited past studies suggesting aspartame had caused tumors in rats, and said tests in the 1970s flagged Ace K as a potential cancer risk.
Coke and Pepsi have both been trying to solve the diet sweetener problem for years. Pepsi tweaked Diet Pepsi a couple of years ago to a blend that retained aspartame but mixed it with acesulfame potassium.
They have both spent heavily in recent years trying to develop zero-calorie sweeteners that can be marketed as natural, not artificial. Each has placed bets on stevia, which is derived from a plant but can leave a bitter aftertaste.
Coke and Pepsi rolled out cola variations sweetened with stevia in the U.S. last year, but mixed in sugar, turning them into mid-calorie colas instead of diet colas.
Again the aluminium connection:
Artificial Chemical Sweeteners - Grocery Warning
Making matters worse, soft drink companies put their liquid products containing aspartame in containers made of aluminum.
When this aluminum - a known neurotoxin - is combined with aspartame, the results are multiplied:
|
on 27-04-2015 08:10 PM
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
An extensive review of the research on aspartame was published in 2007 and concluded:
The data from the extensive investigations into the possibility of neurotoxic effects of aspartame, in general, do not support the
hypothesis that aspartame in the human diet will affect nervous system function, learning or behavior. Epidemiological studies on
aspartame include several case-control studies and one well-conducted prospective epidemiological study with a large cohort, in
which the consumption of aspartame was measured. The studies provide no evidence to support an association between aspartame
and cancer in any tissue. The weight of existing evidence is that aspartame is safe at current levels of consumption as a nonnutritive
sweetener."
Yeah right. So why do you think Pepsi are dropping it for "public health concerns".
Oh that's right. Because ppl are voting with their wallets and not buying their product sweetened with toxic substances.
They're actually switching to BOTTLED WATER.
Argggghhhh!
What people believe, and what is real, are usually two different things.......lol.
Well ain't that the truth...
Although I would amend that to... What people CHOOSE TO believe, and what is real, are usually two different things.......lol.
27-04-2015 08:31 PM - edited 27-04-2015 08:32 PM
Why do you think 'quacks' sell their own products to guliible people that believe their propaganda?
What are the quacks more concerned about - making a buck? or people's health?
on 27-04-2015 08:37 PM
on 27-04-2015 08:40 PM
Just another chemical to put in your body.
At least raw sugar and honey are natural.
on 27-04-2015 08:50 PM
Except the "bucks" this Dr is making by marketing his health products is a drop in the ocean compared to the BIG BUCKS companies like pepsi and coca cola are making by peddling their anti-health products.
on 27-04-2015 08:54 PM
27-04-2015 08:56 PM - edited 27-04-2015 08:58 PM
Except the "bucks" this Dr is making by marketing his health products is a drop in the ocean compared to the BIG BUCKS companies like pepsi and coca cola are making by peddling their anti-health products.
Those big soft drink manufactures are feeling the pinch anyway, as people look for more healthy drinks.
Pepsi and Coke aren't promoting/ advertising that their products are 'healthy' though. Not like quacks who spout propaganda about diseases/illnesses then say buy my products to get cured etc.
An exception that new 'Coke' Life? with green labels?
Coca Cola Life, a delicious new lower calorie drink sweetened with a blend of sugar and stevia leaf extract - ew
Our mother wouldn't ever let us have Coke,cola - we thought she was the meanest mother.
on 27-04-2015 09:42 PM
@icyfroth wrote:I think I've spotted a few astroturfers:
"Does it scare off genuine community members who have an opposing point of view through violent and aggressive behaviour? Astroturfers incite the irrational and volatile in our community (sometimes using psychosocial tactics) for one reason: to make a lot of noise and drown out opposition."
@curmu-curmu wrote:"So not only a nutter - a conspiracy theorist to boot!" and "retards"
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
The Dr quoted in the OP is a nutter.
@am*3 wrote:
"Not surprising these 'quacks' always have their own products to sell to prevent/cure what ever they are going on about.
They aren't informing people for the good of the people, just to make money for themselves.
Icy...not having a shot at you, but please...google Blaylock. So many unsubstantiated claims, unsupported by medical evidence, unsupported by research - even unsupported by his peers!
Here's just one...
http://vaccineconspiracytheorist.blogspot.com.au/2011/06/quack-of-day-dr-russell-blaylock.html
on 27-04-2015 10:00 PM
on 28-04-2015 02:29 AM
When I just have to have a soda, I limit myself to "Diet-Rite" which uses Splenda........a sugar-based derivative..........