on 27-06-2013 05:03 PM
Should they be allowed to serve their full terms?
I am just a bit astounded that the last two PM's have been removed before their terms expired... and Shorten is in the middle of all of it and he was making decisions on not what was best for the country what was best for Labor.
He said he was making this decision for Labor... to save themselves.. not to save the people .... they have no respect for the people of the country.
on 27-06-2013 05:05 PM
Haven't we had as many or more PMs take office mid term as we have at elections?
No, it makes no difference. We vote for our local members.
on 27-06-2013 05:08 PM
It is not unusual for a PM to be replaced mid term... but not in their first year...
This is two PM's replaced before the public can even make a vote against the party or for the party...
on 27-06-2013 05:11 PM
just a reminder of what Labor has given us...
anyone free on the 4th July???
on 27-06-2013 05:12 PM
Some should have been removed at birth
on 27-06-2013 05:20 PM
It is not unusual for a PM to be replaced mid term... but not in their first year...
This is two PM's replaced before the public can even make a vote against the party or for the party...
Neither were replaced in their first year.
Meanwhile we were told last week that abortion is not an issue and guess what? It is being debated in the Senate now.
on 27-06-2013 05:33 PM
Neither were replaced in their first year.
Meanwhile we were told last week that abortion is not an issue and guess what? It is being debated in the Senate now.
I am sure you knew I meant first term as I wrote in my op.
Was up til midnight and was up at 5am for work... bit tired...
Abortion debate.... Who is debating it and what are they saying??
on 27-06-2013 05:39 PM
Senate, not sure where it came from.
on 27-06-2013 05:39 PM
Sorry I don't understand? So what you really meant to say was:
It is not unusual for a PM to be replaced mid term... but not in their first term...
?????
on 27-06-2013 05:40 PM
Apologies - I misread. :8}