on 20-03-2014 08:52 PM
on 25-03-2014 09:28 AM
let George Brandis speak........
don't speak about him
on 25-03-2014 11:12 AM
seeing she is such a great mate of abbrotts and a supporter of the libs, I think this is appropriate here.....
Gina Rinehart the 'corporate welfare' queen
How Australia's richest person, mining heiress Gina Rinehart, secured a $US694 million ($764 million) loan from American taxpayers is surely one of the great ironies of the capitalist system, reports The Australian Financial Review.
on 25-03-2014 11:46 AM
on 25-03-2014 11:52 AM
The Age is behind a pay wall so I have C&P, if your not interested don't read..not looking good for the artful dodger......
Arthur Sinodinos hires silk to represent him at ICAC inquiry
There was a great deal of interest when one of the state's most accomplished and costly barristers stood to announce his appearance at the Independent Commission Against Corruption on Monday morning.
Whoever was briefing Tony Bannon, SC, who had a junior barrister and a solicitor in tow, wouldn't get much change from $7000 a day. It was soon revealed that Mr Bannon was representing Senator Arthur Sinodinos.
Mr Bannon's arrival could not have come at a better time for the beleaguered senator, given the devastating evidence against his client that followed.
At 11.30am Kerry Elizabeth Schott, one of the key witnesses at the inquiry into the breathtaking corruption within Australian Water Holdings, settled into the witness box.
The former Sydney Water chief executive told the inquiry that not long after Mr Sinodinos - as he then was - became chairman of AWH in November 2010, they arranged to meet in the city to talk about the company's out-of-control expenses it was billing Sydney Water. With her was John Brown, who was on Sydney Water's audit committee.
In measured tones Dr Schott told the inquiry AWH's expenses had shot up from $200,000 a month to $600,000 but that the infrastructure minnow had refused to provide any details of the costs. This refusal of his company to co-operate over the ballooning costs was detailed to Mr Sinodinos, Dr Schott said.
But there was worse to come. ''We suggested to Mr Sinodinos he might be careful with company he was keeping. We thought that they may be dishonest,'' offered Dr Schott.
Given Mr Sinodinos' legendary political nous, one might wonder why he didn't run a mile. This was the second warning that Mr Sinodinos received that all was not right in AWH.
Six month's before Dr Schott's admonition, financier Rod De Aboitiz, who had invested $1 million in AWH, told Mr Sinodinos the directors were paying themselves ''extremely high'' salaries and racking up excessive costs while the company was in a parlous financial state. He said he told Senator Sinodinos: ''Arthur, you know that solvency is a big issue for a director.'' De Aboitiz, the former chief financial officer at investment bank Rothschild, also pointed out to Mr Sinodinos the mysterious payments going from AWH to the Liberal Party.
The inquiry has heard that more than $75,000 of money being billed to Sydney Water by AWH was being donated to the Liberal Party. At the time Mr Sinodinos was the treasurer of the NSW branch of the party. Dr Schott wasn't the only one of the opinion that AWH were a dishonest bunch.
on 25-03-2014 12:09 PM
Gina Rinehart the 'corporate welfare' queen
How Australia's richest person, mining heiress Gina Rinehart, secured a $US694 million ($764 million) loan from American taxpayers is surely one of the great ironies of the capitalist system, reports The Australian Financial Review.
Ironic" an export orientated US commercial bank participating in a commercial venture deemed viable by 18 other foreign financial organisations?. I think perhaps someone (or two) have overlooked their Webster's
And now the whole story B1G:
RHinehart's mining group, Hancock Prospecting, last week signed off on a $US7.2 billion debt package for her highly anticipated Roy Hill iron ore project in Western Australia's Pilbara region.
There are 19 international lenders, including Australia's big four banks, in the syndicate. Government export credit agencies including the Ex-Im Bank in the US, as well as Japan and Korea, were crucial in helping the massive debt-funding deal over the line.
In return for the US government loan, Hancock Prospecting will purchase American mining and rail equipment from Caterpillar, General Electric and Atlas Copco. The Export-Import Bank says their involvement will "support" 3400 US jobs.
Hardly "corporate welfare" B1G: negotiated business loans for $US7.2 billion involving five export credit agencies and a consortium of 19 commercial banks, all of whom expect a positive return on their investment capital, as do I, holding shares in our 4 major banks.
nɥºɾ
25-03-2014 12:15 PM - edited 25-03-2014 12:17 PM
I wonder why the writer on the link does not tell us what they really think ??
http://uknowispeaksense.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/reality-check-for-gina-rinehart/
re the fossil fuel subsidy
"It would be very hard to put a price tag on the amount of support her family’s empire has received (and is still receiving) but if it was a loan with interest she would probably have to declare bankruptcy if she was required to pay it back. Of course that hasn’t stopped her from sinking the boot into the most vulnerable by basically accusing them of having a handout mentality by saying that taxpayers’ money isn’t a “bottomless pit”.
on 25-03-2014 12:20 PM
on 25-03-2014 12:22 PM
a better mannered attempt
http://kevinprice.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/gina-rineharts-misplaced-reality.html
The point is, there is no such thing as a 'self made man'. Every successful businessman or entrepreneur has used the not inconsiderable Australian infrastructure, built by our collective fathers, paid for by the taxpayers, to make his money.
Every one. Not one successfully rich businessman made his money alone - not Rupert Murdoch, Not Kerry Packer, certainly not Lang Hancock
- he did it with the assistance of the taxpayer-built infrastructure, getting rich on what others did before and alongside him.
Don't think for one minute that men like your father alone, out of their own enterprise, built the banking system, the treasury, the departments of trade and industry that facilitate the sale and trade of resources, the judicial system that protects your deals (and allows your own family to challenge your sense of entitlement), the labour markets that are created, maintained and made available by government.
No, they were built by the taxpayers of Australia, for the benefit of all Australians, fairly, equitably and with a view to building a better future.
Ms Rinehart, you are not simply 'entitled' to keep and multiply the benefits of the wealth left to you by your father to be used for personal gain through influencing the government of the day.
Every time you use your influence to reduce your contribution - the MRRT was such an example - you are exercising your belief that you are entitled, and you are stealing from the Australian people. You and others like you, owe the Australian tax payer a great deal, and you should be paying it back.
on 25-03-2014 12:22 PM
A little court induced air freshening of the "putrid stench" finally, with the ex blubberer, liar, convicted criminal, ex union official, ALP member Thomson sentenced to some compulsory deodourising.
This thread is about "Putrid stench of Liberal hypocrisy", now that is ironic!
nɥºɾ
on 25-03-2014 02:58 PM
@monman12 wrote:A little court induced air freshening of the "putrid stench" finally, with the ex blubberer, liar, convicted criminal, ex union official, ALP member Thomson sentenced to some compulsory deodourising.
This thread is about "Putrid stench of Liberal hypocrisy", now that is ironic!
nɥºɾ
exactly, this thread is about Putrid stench of Liberal hypocrisy" so please stay on topic.